On 2/21/2008 12:17 PM, Greg KH wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 11:36:23AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
On Thu, 21 Feb 2008, Andrew Buehler wrote:
[Greg KH]
I know he's in the CC:, but I'm not sure he's reading this
thread, and I'm hesitant to bother people about things out of the
blue unless I
On 2/20/2008 2:29 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Andrew Buehler wrote:
In other words: I don't think that's likely to be practical in the
present instance. If you have reason to believe otherwise (past
positive experience with Novell, for instance), I'd be glad to hear
it.
Greg
On 2/20/2008 2:29 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Andrew Buehler wrote:
In other words: I don't think that's likely to be practical in the
present instance. If you have reason to believe otherwise (past
positive experience with Novell, for instance), I'd be glad to hear
it.
Greg
On 2/21/2008 12:17 PM, Greg KH wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 11:36:23AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
On Thu, 21 Feb 2008, Andrew Buehler wrote:
[Greg KH]
I know he's in the CC:, but I'm not sure he's reading this
thread, and I'm hesitant to bother people about things out of the
blue unless I
On 2/20/2008 12:15 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Andrew Buehler wrote:
Hmm. One thing which just sprang to mind, in the stab-in-the-dark
category: in 2.6.24.2, launching the program on some machines gave
warnings along the lines of "this program is using a deprecated
:
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008, Andrew Buehler wrote:
With those two problems out of the way, what is left is the
hard-drive issue, and that is also halfway fixed by enabling ACPI.
Specifically, it is "fixed" in that the kernel sees the hard drive
and I can mount it, but it is not fixed in that the
:
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008, Andrew Buehler wrote:
With those two problems out of the way, what is left is the
hard-drive issue, and that is also halfway fixed by enabling ACPI.
Specifically, it is fixed in that the kernel sees the hard drive
and I can mount it, but it is not fixed in that the program we need
On 2/20/2008 12:15 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Andrew Buehler wrote:
Hmm. One thing which just sprang to mind, in the stab-in-the-dark
category: in 2.6.24.2, launching the program on some machines gave
warnings along the lines of this program is using a deprecated
ioctl
On 2/16/2008 10:35 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008, Andrew Buehler wrote:
Until this thread, I was not even aware that ACPI was related to
USB; I had largely conflated it with a similar acronym which I
think is related to power management and which I can suddenly not
even find
On 2/16/2008 10:35 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008, Andrew Buehler wrote:
Until this thread, I was not even aware that ACPI was related to
USB; I had largely conflated it with a similar acronym which I
think is related to power management and which I can suddenly not
even find
On 2/16/2008 10:35 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008, Andrew Buehler wrote:
Messages sent to my address directly are explicitly not filtered
into the folders I have set up for various mailing lists, so that
if someone does send me a "heads up" reply for a specific topic
anything specifically kernel-related in
this subthread, I do not intend to reply publicly in it again unless
requested to do so.
--
Andrew Buehler
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo inf
anything specifically kernel-related in
this subthread, I do not intend to reply publicly in it again unless
requested to do so.
--
Andrew Buehler
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http
On 2/16/2008 10:35 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008, Andrew Buehler wrote:
Messages sent to my address directly are explicitly not filtered
into the folders I have set up for various mailing lists, so that
if someone does send me a heads up reply for a specific topic on
a list
On 2/16/2008 6:11 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008, Andrew Buehler wrote:
For another, getting two copies of a message is no big deal --
I disagree.
Everyone has his own taste. Obviously there's no world-wide
consensus, possibly because different people have different workflow
to avoid it and still make sure all relevant people receive
the message.)
On 2/16/2008 10:20 AM, Alan Stern wrote:
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008, Oliver Pinter wrote:
On 2/15/08, Andrew Buehler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In my workplace, I use a customized version of Novell's ZENworks
imaging b
to avoid it and still make sure all relevant people receive
the message.)
On 2/16/2008 10:20 AM, Alan Stern wrote:
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008, Oliver Pinter wrote:
On 2/15/08, Andrew Buehler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In my workplace, I use a customized version of Novell's ZENworks
imaging boot CD
On 2/16/2008 6:11 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008, Andrew Buehler wrote:
For another, getting two copies of a message is no big deal --
I disagree.
Everyone has his own taste. Obviously there's no world-wide
consensus, possibly because different people have different workflow
that I have not provided enough information to
address the problem. Please let me know what would be necessary, and I
will do my best to provide it. Additionally, if I have made any major
flubs (of etiquette or otherwise), please do point them out so that I
can avoid them in future.
--
Andrew Buehler
that I have not provided enough information to
address the problem. Please let me know what would be necessary, and I
will do my best to provide it. Additionally, if I have made any major
flubs (of etiquette or otherwise), please do point them out so that I
can avoid them in future.
--
Andrew Buehler
20 matches
Mail list logo
