,Stephane Eranian
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Message-ID: <79bcbaf7-bf5f-4556-a923-56e9d82fb...@gmail.com>
On May 15, 2020 4:42:46 PM GMT-03:00, Andrii Nakryiko
wrote:
>On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 10:01 AM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
> wrote:
>>
>> Em Fri, May 15, 2020 at 09:50:00AM -0700, Ian R
On May 11, 2020 4:56:43 PM GMT-03:00, "Gustavo A. R. Silva"
wrote:
>The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
>extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
>variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array
>member[1][2],
>introduced i
On May 11, 2020 2:26:20 PM GMT-03:00, "Gustavo A. R. Silva"
wrote:
>On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 12:48:12PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
>wrote:
>> Em Thu, May 07, 2020 at 02:06:15PM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva
>escreveu:
>> > The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
>> >
On May 10, 2020 12:23:36 PM GMT-03:00, Steven Rostedt
wrote:
>On Sun, 10 May 2020 23:06:09 +0800
>Changbin Du wrote:
>
>> The perf has basic kernel ftrace support but lack support of most
>tracing
>> options. This serias is target to enhance the perf ftrace
>functionality so
>> that we can ma
On May 1, 2020 8:25:52 AM GMT-03:00, Jiri Olsa wrote:
>On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 10:11:03AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
>wrote:
>> From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
>>
>> I.e. so far we had just one event in that side band thread, a dummy
>one
>> with attr.bpf_event set, so that 'perf record'
On April 28, 2020 6:58:46 PM GMT-03:00, Joe Perches wrote:
>On Tue, 2020-04-28 at 14:50 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>> Em Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 08:31:05PM +0800, Zou Wei escreveu:
>> > This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software:
>> >
>> > tools/perf/builtin-script.c:328
Em Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 02:12:29PM +0100, David Ahern escreveu:
> On 10/24/13 1:27 PM, Arnaldo Melo wrote:
> The driving use case is my perf-daemon:
> https://github.com/dsahern/linux/blob/perf-sched-timehist-3.11/tools/perf/schedmon.c,
> line 271.
>
> Rather than have the p
Em Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 11:23:32AM +0100, David Ahern escreveu:
> On 10/24/13 10:30 AM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> >Bah, checking that again, there don't seem to be a bug there. Actually
> >the sample buffer is reset after we pick the last entry. So it looks
> >all fine. I got confused as usual.
8 matches
Mail list logo