Hi,
I'm surprised nobody considered GNU Arch
(http://www.gnu.org/software/gnu-arch/) to replace BitKeeper - it was
probably started in direct response to the Linux Kernel using a
non-free tool.
I must say I haven't used it, but from reviews and comparisons I've
read, it seems to be a good
Hi,
I'm surprised nobody considered GNU Arch
(http://www.gnu.org/software/gnu-arch/) to replace BitKeeper - it was
probably started in direct response to the Linux Kernel using a
non-free tool.
I must say I haven't used it, but from reviews and comparisons I've
read, it seems to be a good
Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 10:33:03AM +, Asfand Yar Qazi wrote:
No, but I do need NCQ
Perhaps a stupid question... but: Why do you _need_ NCQ? If you need it
that badly (not sure why anyone would), you could always get SCSI or a
3ware controller.
For the novelty value
Pawel Sikora wrote:
Do You really need nforce4?
Maybe sis76[01]GX will be enough? :-)
http://www.sis.com/products/sis760gx.htm
http://www.sis.com/pressroom/pressrelease_000184.htm
No, but I do need NCQ
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a
Asfand Yar Qazi wrote:
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
* "hardware firewall" -- sounds silly. Pretty sure Linux doesn't
support
it in any case.
probably just one of those things implemented in the binary drivers in
software, just like the "hardware" IDE raid is most of t
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
* "hardware firewall" -- sounds silly. Pretty sure Linux doesn't support
it in any case.
probably just one of those things implemented in the binary drivers in
software, just like the "hardware" IDE raid is most of the time (3ware
being the positive exception there)
Hi,
I'm currently contemplating going for an Athlon 64 system. However,
I'll primarily be using a Linux-based OS (Gentoo, namely), so I need
to know how well the chipsets are supported currently.
I'd really like to go Via - but the crummy KT890 / VT8237 combo sucks
- mainly due to the lack of
Hi,
I'm currently contemplating going for an Athlon 64 system. However,
I'll primarily be using a Linux-based OS (Gentoo, namely), so I need
to know how well the chipsets are supported currently.
I'd really like to go Via - but the crummy KT890 / VT8237 combo sucks
- mainly due to the lack of
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
* hardware firewall -- sounds silly. Pretty sure Linux doesn't support
it in any case.
probably just one of those things implemented in the binary drivers in
software, just like the hardware IDE raid is most of the time (3ware
being the positive exception there)
Asfand Yar Qazi wrote:
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
* hardware firewall -- sounds silly. Pretty sure Linux doesn't
support
it in any case.
probably just one of those things implemented in the binary drivers in
software, just like the hardware IDE raid is most of the time (3ware
being the positive
Pawel Sikora wrote:
OT
Do You really need nforce4?
Maybe sis76[01]GX will be enough? :-)
http://www.sis.com/products/sis760gx.htm
http://www.sis.com/pressroom/pressrelease_000184.htm
/OT
No, but I do need NCQ
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a
Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 10:33:03AM +, Asfand Yar Qazi wrote:
No, but I do need NCQ
Perhaps a stupid question... but: Why do you _need_ NCQ? If you need it
that badly (not sure why anyone would), you could always get SCSI or a
3ware controller.
For the novelty value
12 matches
Mail list logo
