Re: Multi kernel tree support on the same distro?

2007-01-04 Thread Auke Kok
Akula2 wrote: Hello All, I am looking to use multiple kernel trees on the same distro. Example:- 2.6.19.1 for - software/tools development 2.4.34for - embedded systems development. I do know that 2.6 supports embedded in a big waybut still requirement demands to work with such boards

Re: Multi kernel tree support on the same distro?

2007-01-04 Thread Auke Kok
Steve Brueggeman wrote: There are some difficulties with gcc versions between linux-2.4 and linux-2.6, but I do not recall all of the details off of the top of my head. If I recall correctly, one of the issues is, linux-2.4 ?prefers? gcc-2.96, while newer linux-2.6 support/prefer gcc-3.? or

Re: [PATCH 2/2]: Use newly defined PCI channel offline routine

2006-12-12 Thread Auke Kok
Linas Vepstas wrote: Use newly minted routine to access the PCI channel state. Signed-off-by: Linas Vepstas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ACK, thanks Linas. If it doesn't get picked up I can stack it on my queue for netdev later. Auke drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c |2 +-

Re: [PATCH 2.6.19] e1000: Replace kmalloc+memset with kcalloc + remove now unused size variable

2006-12-12 Thread Auke Kok
Yan Burman wrote: Replace kmalloc+memset with kcalloc and remove unused size variable Signed-off-by: Yan Burman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> nitpick, e1000 indenting indents successive lines to the first brace unsing spaces thus: foo_bar_baz_(aaa, bbb, ); and

Re: [PATCH 2.6.19] e100: replace kmalloc with kcalloc

2006-12-12 Thread Auke Kok
Yan Burman wrote: Replace kmalloc+memset with kcalloc ACK, fine with me. Signed-off-by: Yan Burman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff -rubp linux-2.6.19-rc5_orig/drivers/net/e100.c linux-2.6.19-rc5_kzalloc/drivers/net/e100.c --- linux-2.6.19-rc5_orig/drivers/net/e100.c2006-11-09

Re: [PATCH 2.6.19] e1000: replace kmalloc with kzalloc

2006-12-12 Thread Auke Kok
Pekka Enberg wrote: On 12/12/06, Yan Burman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: size = txdr->count * sizeof(struct e1000_buffer); - if (!(txdr->buffer_info = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL))) { + if (!(txdr->buffer_info = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL))) { ret_val = 1;

Re: [PATCH 2.6.19] e1000: replace kmalloc with kzalloc

2006-12-12 Thread Auke Kok
Pekka Enberg wrote: On 12/12/06, Yan Burman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: size = txdr-count * sizeof(struct e1000_buffer); - if (!(txdr-buffer_info = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL))) { + if (!(txdr-buffer_info = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL))) { ret_val = 1;

Re: [PATCH 2.6.19] e1000: Replace kmalloc+memset with kcalloc + remove now unused size variable

2006-12-12 Thread Auke Kok
Yan Burman wrote: Replace kmalloc+memset with kcalloc and remove unused size variable Signed-off-by: Yan Burman [EMAIL PROTECTED] nitpick, e1000 indenting indents successive lines to the first brace unsing spaces thus: foo_bar_baz_(aaa, bbb, ); and not

Re: [PATCH 2/2]: Use newly defined PCI channel offline routine

2006-12-12 Thread Auke Kok
Linas Vepstas wrote: Use newly minted routine to access the PCI channel state. Signed-off-by: Linas Vepstas [EMAIL PROTECTED] ACK, thanks Linas. If it doesn't get picked up I can stack it on my queue for netdev later. Auke drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c |2 +-

Re: [PATCH 2.6.19] e100: replace kmalloc with kcalloc

2006-12-12 Thread Auke Kok
Yan Burman wrote: Replace kmalloc+memset with kcalloc ACK, fine with me. Signed-off-by: Yan Burman [EMAIL PROTECTED] diff -rubp linux-2.6.19-rc5_orig/drivers/net/e100.c linux-2.6.19-rc5_kzalloc/drivers/net/e100.c --- linux-2.6.19-rc5_orig/drivers/net/e100.c2006-11-09 12:16:21.0

Re: [PATCH 2/6] e1000: use pcix_set_mmrbc

2006-12-08 Thread Auke Kok
Stephen Hemminger wrote: On Fri, 08 Dec 2006 13:45:05 -0800 Roland Dreier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -if (hw->bus_type == e1000_bus_type_pcix) { > -e1000_read_pci_cfg(hw, PCIX_COMMAND_REGISTER, _cmd_word); > -e1000_read_pci_cfg(hw, PCIX_STATUS_REGISTER_HI,

Re: [PATCH 2/6] e1000: use pcix_set_mmrbc

2006-12-08 Thread Auke Kok
Stephen Hemminger wrote: On Fri, 08 Dec 2006 13:45:05 -0800 Roland Dreier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -if (hw-bus_type == e1000_bus_type_pcix) { -e1000_read_pci_cfg(hw, PCIX_COMMAND_REGISTER, pcix_cmd_word); -e1000_read_pci_cfg(hw, PCIX_STATUS_REGISTER_HI,

2.6.19-rc6-mm2: Network device naming starts at 1 instead of 0

2006-12-05 Thread Auke Kok
[resend] Quick note: I loaded up 2.6.19-rc6-mm2 on a platform here and noticed that the onboard e1000 NIC was enumerated to eth1 instead of eth0. on 2.6.18.5 and any other kernel I used before, it was properly named eth0 after startup. eth0 itself is completely missing (-ENODEV). I'll try to

2.6.19-rc6-mm2: Network device naming starts at 1 instead of 0

2006-12-05 Thread Auke Kok
[resend] Quick note: I loaded up 2.6.19-rc6-mm2 on a platform here and noticed that the onboard e1000 NIC was enumerated to eth1 instead of eth0. on 2.6.18.5 and any other kernel I used before, it was properly named eth0 after startup. eth0 itself is completely missing (-ENODEV). I'll try to

Re: git web (Re: nightly 2.6 LXR run?)

2006-11-16 Thread Auke Kok
Oleg Verych wrote: On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 03:19:20PM -0800, Auke Kok wrote: [] try to use `git2.kernel.org` instead of `git.kernel.org`. The second server somehow only has an average load of ~4 instead of ~250. Looking closer, i see all gitweb links (C) on both servers links are poining

Re: git web (Re: nightly 2.6 LXR run?)

2006-11-16 Thread Auke Kok
Oleg Verych wrote: On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 03:19:20PM -0800, Auke Kok wrote: [] try to use `git2.kernel.org` instead of `git.kernel.org`. The second server somehow only has an average load of ~4 instead of ~250. Looking closer, i see all gitweb links (C) on both servers links are poining

<    1   2