[PATCH 3/3] ext4_group_t: mballoc changes

Ext4: change groups to ext4_group_t in mballoc.c From: Avantika Mathur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Avantika Mathur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 84 -- 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)

[PATCH 2/3] ext4_group_t: Fix negative groups

Ext4: fixes block group number being set to a negative value From: Avantika Mathur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> This patch fixes various places where the group number is set to a negative value. Signed-off-by: Avantika Mathur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- fs/ext4/ial

[PATCH 1/3] ext4_group_t: Add new type

current grpnum_t patches currently in the queue. Thanks Avantika --- Ext4: add ext4_group_t, and change all group variables to this type. From: Avantika Mathur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> In many places variables for block group are of type int, which limits the maximum number of block groups t

Re: [PATCH] Ext4: Uninitialized Block Groups

Andreas Dilger wrote: On Sep 18, 2007 20:03 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 17:25:31 -0700 Avantika Mathur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: +#if !defined(CONFIG_CRC16) +/** CRC table for the CRC-16. The poly is 0x8005 (x16 + x15 + x2 + 1) */ +__u16 const crc16_tab

Re: cfq performance gap

On Fri, 2006-12-08 at 13:05 +0100, Jens Axboe wrote: > On Thu, Dec 07 2006, Avantika Mathur wrote: > > Hi Jens, > > (you probably noticed now, but the [EMAIL PROTECTED] email is no longer > valid) I saw that, thanks! > > I've noticed a performance gap between t

cfq performance gap

kload is 16 processes running 4k random reads. Is this performance gap a known issue? Thanks, Avantika Mathur - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majo