Re: [PATCH] arp_filter patch for 2.4.4 kernel.

2001-05-05 Thread Ben Greear
"David S. Miller" wrote: > > Ben Greear writes: > > This patch is ported from Andi Kleen's work for the 2.2.19 kernel (I think > > it was his, at least...) > > > > It adds the ability to run multiple interfaces on the same subnet, > > o

[PATCH] arp_filter patch for 2.4.4 kernel.

2001-05-05 Thread Ben Greear
ppedIcmps ArpFilter" " TW TWRecycled TWKilled" " PAWSPassive PAWSActive PAWSEstab" " DelayedACKs DelayedACKLocked DelayedACKLost" -- Ben Greear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED

[PATCH] arp_filter patch for 2.4.4 kernel.

2001-05-05 Thread Ben Greear
PAWSEstab DelayedACKs DelayedACKLocked DelayedACKLost -- Ben Greear [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] President of Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com ScryMUD: http://scry.wanfear.com http://scry.wanfear.com/~greear - To unsubscribe from

Re: [PATCH] arp_filter patch for 2.4.4 kernel.

2001-05-05 Thread Ben Greear
David S. Miller wrote: Ben Greear writes: This patch is ported from Andi Kleen's work for the 2.2.19 kernel (I think it was his, at least...) It adds the ability to run multiple interfaces on the same subnet, on the same machine, and have the ARPs for each interface be answered

Compile problem with 2.4.4-pre6 (net_pcmcia.o not found in link)

2001-04-22 Thread Ben Greear
If I configure PCMCIA out of the build, the build will not link, because the linker is still looking for the net_pcmcia.o file. If I say yes for PCMCIA and enable a single module, it works. compile configuration available if someone would like to see it. Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear ([EMAIL

Compile problem with 2.4.4-pre6 (net_pcmcia.o not found in link)

2001-04-22 Thread Ben Greear
If I configure PCMCIA out of the build, the build will not link, because the linker is still looking for the net_pcmcia.o file. If I say yes for PCMCIA and enable a single module, it works. compile configuration available if someone would like to see it. Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear ([EMAIL

802.1Q VLAN patch for 2.4.4-pre3 & 2.2.19

2001-04-16 Thread Ben Greear
http://scry.wanfear.com/~greear/vlan.html -- Ben Greear ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.candelatech.com Author of ScryMUD: scry.wanfear.com (Released under GPL) http://scry.wanfear.com http://scry.wanfear.com/~greear - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscr

802.1Q VLAN patch for 2.4.4-pre3 2.2.19

2001-04-16 Thread Ben Greear
://scry.wanfear.com/~greear/vlan.html -- Ben Greear ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.candelatech.com Author of ScryMUD: scry.wanfear.com (Released under GPL) http://scry.wanfear.com http://scry.wanfear.com/~greear - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe

Re: No 100 HZ timer!

2001-04-15 Thread Ben Greear
Jamie Lokier wrote: > > george anzinger wrote: > > Horst von Brand wrote: > > > > > > Ben Greear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > > > > [...] > > > > > > > Wouldn't a heap be a good data structure for a list of timers?

Re: No 100 HZ timer!

2001-04-15 Thread Ben Greear
george anzinger wrote: > > Horst von Brand wrote: > > > > Ben Greear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > > [...] > > > > > Wouldn't a heap be a good data structure for a list of timers? Insertion > > > is log(n) and finding the one with th

Re: No 100 HZ timer!

2001-04-15 Thread Ben Greear
george anzinger wrote: Horst von Brand wrote: Ben Greear [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: [...] Wouldn't a heap be a good data structure for a list of timers? Insertion is log(n) and finding the one with the least time is O(1), ie pop off the front It can be implemented

Re: No 100 HZ timer!

2001-04-15 Thread Ben Greear
Jamie Lokier wrote: george anzinger wrote: Horst von Brand wrote: Ben Greear [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: [...] Wouldn't a heap be a good data structure for a list of timers? Insertion is log(n) and finding the one with the least time is O(1), ie pop off the front

Re: No 100 HZ timer!

2001-04-12 Thread Ben Greear
t; Bret Indrelee | Sometimes, to be deep, we must act shallow! > [EMAIL PROTECTED] | -Riff in The Quatrix > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > More majordomo info at http://vger.ker

Re: No 100 HZ timer!

2001-04-12 Thread Ben Greear
o at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- Ben Greear ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.candelatech.com Author of ScryMUD: scry.wanfear.com (Released under GPL) http://scry.wanfear.com http://scry.wanfear.c

Re: 2.4.2 ext2 filesystem corruption ? (was 2.4.2: What happened ?(No

2001-03-07 Thread Ben Greear
Alexander Viro wrote: > > On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Ben Greear wrote: > > > However, messing with the hdparms options can do random things, at > > least from my perspective as a user: It may bring exciting new performance > > to your system, and it may subtly, or not s

Re: 2.4.2 ext2 filesystem corruption ? (was 2.4.2: What happened ? (No

2001-03-07 Thread Ben Greear
ware? For the power/insane user, there could be a --really-do-stupid-thing-i-told-you-to option, and it should be that hard to type!! Ben -- Ben Greear ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.candelatech.com Author of ScryMUD: scry.wanfear.com (Released under GPL) http://scry.wan

Re: 2.4.2 ext2 filesystem corruption ? (was 2.4.2: What happened ?(No

2001-03-07 Thread Ben Greear
Alexander Viro wrote: On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Ben Greear wrote: However, messing with the hdparms options can do random things, at least from my perspective as a user: It may bring exciting new performance to your system, and it may subtly, or not so, corrupt your file system. It's

Re: 2.4.2 ext2 filesystem corruption ? (was 2.4.2: What happened ? (No

2001-03-06 Thread Ben Greear
> - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- Ben Greear ([EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: 2.4.2 ext2 filesystem corruption ? (was 2.4.2: What happened ? (No

2001-03-06 Thread Ben Greear
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- Ben Greear ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.candelatech.com Author of ScryMUD: scry.wanfear.com (Released under

Re: 2.4.2 ext2 filesystem corruption ? (was 2.4.2: What happened ? (No such file or directory))

2001-03-05 Thread Ben Greear
my machine with the HD light on solid... Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.candelatech.com Author of ScryMUD: scry.wanfear.com (Released under GPL) http://scry.wanfear.com http://scry.wanfear.com/~greear - To unsubscribe from this list: send

Re: 2.4.2 ext2 filesystem corruption ? (was 2.4.2: What happened ? (No such file or directory))

2001-03-05 Thread Ben Greear
my machine with the HD light on solid... Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.candelatech.com Author of ScryMUD: scry.wanfear.com (Released under GPL) http://scry.wanfear.com http://scry.wanfear.com/~greear - To unsubscribe from this list: send

How to determine what driver belongs to eth0 (ethX)?

2001-01-24 Thread Ben Greear
-- Ben Greear ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.candelatech.com Author of ScryMUD: scry.wanfear.com (Released under GPL) http://scry.wanfear.com http://scry.wanfear.com/~greear - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of

Re: changing mac address of eth alias

2001-01-24 Thread Ben Greear
David Weis wrote: > > On Tue, 23 Jan 2001, Ben Greear wrote: > > David Weis wrote: > > > what would be required to make the mac address of aliases changable, > > > specifically for something like vrrp that shares a mac address among > > > machines. > >

Re: changing mac address of eth alias

2001-01-24 Thread Ben Greear
David Weis wrote: On Tue, 23 Jan 2001, Ben Greear wrote: David Weis wrote: what would be required to make the mac address of aliases changable, specifically for something like vrrp that shares a mac address among machines. Not sure you can do that, but you could use an 802.1Q

How to determine what driver belongs to eth0 (ethX)?

2001-01-24 Thread Ben Greear
-- Ben Greear ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.candelatech.com Author of ScryMUD: scry.wanfear.com (Released under GPL) http://scry.wanfear.com http://scry.wanfear.com/~greear - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of

Re: changing mac address of eth alias

2001-01-23 Thread Ben Greear
LANs. You can now change the MAC address on a VLAN with my patch: http://scry.wanfear.com/~greear/vlan.html Ben -- Ben Greear ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.candelatech.com Author of ScryMUD: scry.wanfear.com (Released under GPL) http://scry.wanfear.com http://scry.w

Re: changing mac address of eth alias

2001-01-23 Thread Ben Greear
the MAC address on a VLAN with my patch: http://scry.wanfear.com/~greear/vlan.html Ben -- Ben Greear ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.candelatech.com Author of ScryMUD: scry.wanfear.com (Released under GPL) http://scry.wanfear.com http://scry.wanfear.com/~greear

[PATCH] 802.1Q VLAN for Linux

2001-01-19 Thread Ben Greear
dule.) For comparison, there is also another VLAN project at http://vlan.sourceforge.net, but I think mine is better, or at least has a more colorful web-page! :) Comments are welcome. Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.candelatech.com Author of ScryMUD: scry.wanfear.com

[PATCH] 802.1Q VLAN for Linux

2001-01-19 Thread Ben Greear
.) For comparison, there is also another VLAN project at http://vlan.sourceforge.net, but I think mine is better, or at least has a more colorful web-page! :) Comments are welcome. Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.candelatech.com Author of ScryMUD: scry.wanfear.com

Question on 2.2.18 and setting a device to PROMISC.

2001-01-14 Thread Ben Greear
dev->name, dev->vlan_dev->real_dev->name); dev_set_promiscuity(dev->vlan_dev->real_dev, 1); } } else { printk("VLAN (%s): Underlying device (%s) has same MAC, not checking promiscious m

Question on 2.2.18 and setting a device to PROMISC.

2001-01-14 Thread Ben Greear
erlying device (%s) has same MAC, not checking promiscious mode.\n", dev-name, dev-vlan_dev-real_dev-name); } return 0; } -- Ben Greear ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.candelatech.com Author of ScryMUD: scry.wanfear.com (Released under G

Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission

2001-01-09 Thread Ben Greear
he better solutions? And what does your dislike for sales and management have to do with the topic at hand? -- Ben Greear ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.candelatech.com Author of ScryMUD: scry.wanfear.com (Released under GPL) http://scry.wanfear.com http://scry.wanfea

Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (New Benchmarks)

2001-01-09 Thread Ben Greear
Andi Kleen wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 04:23:41PM +0100, Ben Greear wrote: > > I don't argue that ifconfig shouldn't be fixed, but the hash speeds up > > It's already fixed since months. There was one stupid algorithm, which > I was to blame for when I changed ifc

Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission

2001-01-09 Thread Ben Greear
have to do with the topic at hand? -- Ben Greear ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.candelatech.com Author of ScryMUD: scry.wanfear.com (Released under GPL) http://scry.wanfear.com http://scry.wanfear.com/~greear - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscri

Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (New Benchmarks)

2001-01-08 Thread Ben Greear
"David S. Miller" wrote: > >Date:Mon, 08 Jan 2001 01:12:21 -0700 > From: Ben Greear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >http://grok.yi.org/~greear/hashed_dev.png >(If you can't get to it, let me know and I'll email it to you...some > c

Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (New Benchmarks)

2001-01-08 Thread Ben Greear
"David S. Miller" wrote: Date:Mon, 08 Jan 2001 01:12:21 -0700 From: Ben Greear [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://grok.yi.org/~greear/hashed_dev.png (If you can't get to it, let me know and I'll email it to you...some cable modem networks have I firewalled.)

Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (New Benchmarks)

2001-01-07 Thread Ben Greear
, then go ahead and tell me now so that I can go back to hacking code and just include this patch with my VLAN patch. Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.candelatech.com Author of ScryMUD: scry.wanfear.com (Released under GPL) http://scry.wanfear.com

Re: routable interfaces WAS( Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup(DoesNOTmeet Linus' sumission policy!)

2001-01-07 Thread Ben Greear
jamal wrote: > > On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, Ben Greear wrote: > > > Hrm, what if they just made each IP-SEC interface a net_device? If they > > are a routable entity, with it's own IP address, it starts to look a lot > > like an interface/net_device. > > As

Re: routable interfaces WAS( Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup(DoesNOT meet Linus' sumission policy!)

2001-01-07 Thread Ben Greear
only thing I ever thought of was the linear lookups, which is why I wrote the hash code. The beauty of working with existing user-space tools should not be over-looked! It may be easier to fix other problems with many interface/net_devices than cram a whole other virtual net_device structure (wi

Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumissionpolicy!)

2001-01-07 Thread Ben Greear
repeat for ip as well ;-> I can show a range w/out much trouble. I think I'll also tweak the hash code to just do linear lookups if the number of interfaces is below some number, (probably 20, or whatever the numbers show is good...) Ben -- Ben Greear ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.ca

Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission

2001-01-07 Thread Ben Greear
jamal wrote: > > On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, Ben Greear wrote: > > > > Question: How do devices with hardware vlan support fit into your model ? > > > > I don't know of any, and I'm not sure how they would be supported. > > > > erm, this is a MUST. You MU

Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission

2001-01-07 Thread Ben Greear
I make sure that it is second in the list? > > Register vlan in the top level protocol hash then have that yank the header > and feed the packets through the hash again. Thats what it already does, if I understand correctly. Of course, if VLAN is loaded as a module, then it will be in

Re: routable interfaces WAS( Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (DoesNOT meet Linus' sumission policy!)

2001-01-07 Thread Ben Greear
What problem does this fix? If you are mucking with the ifindex, you may be affecting many places in the rest of the kernel, as well as user-space programs which use ifindex to bind to raw devices. On the other hand, the hash patch touches only one file, and should not have any external impacts.

Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission

2001-01-07 Thread Ben Greear
rest of the VLAN MACs on that physical interface. For OSPF you also need to have multicast work on them, and other things that look very much like a real interface. Also, by making the VLANs a net_device, the rest of the kernel and user-space code (ip, ifconfig, for example), works as expected, w

Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission

2001-01-07 Thread Ben Greear
can the map Actually, VLAN code no longer uses this method to generate it's name, it uses it's own mechanism (which, by the way, the hashed name lookup makes much faster.) So, this part of the patch can be removed. > > Question: How do devices with hardware vlan support fit into your model ?

Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission

2001-01-07 Thread Ben Greear
. For OSPF you also need to have multicast work on them, and other things that look very much like a real interface. Also, by making the VLANs a net_device, the rest of the kernel and user-space code (ip, ifconfig, for example), works as expected, with no changes. -- Ben Greear ([EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: routable interfaces WAS( Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (DoesNOT meet Linus' sumission policy!)

2001-01-07 Thread Ben Greear
king with the ifindex, you may be affecting many places in the rest of the kernel, as well as user-space programs which use ifindex to bind to raw devices. On the other hand, the hash patch touches only one file, and should not have any external impacts. Thoughts? cheers, jamal -- Ben Gr

Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission

2001-01-07 Thread Ben Greear
, by the way, the hashed name lookup makes much faster.) So, this part of the patch can be removed. Question: How do devices with hardware vlan support fit into your model ? I don't know of any, and I'm not sure how they would be supported. Alan -- Ben Greear ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http

Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission

2001-01-07 Thread Ben Greear
in the top level protocol hash then have that yank the header and feed the packets through the hash again. Thats what it already does, if I understand correctly. Of course, if VLAN is loaded as a module, then it will be in the hash before IP, right? -- Ben Greear ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http

Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission

2001-01-07 Thread Ben Greear
jamal wrote: On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, Ben Greear wrote: Question: How do devices with hardware vlan support fit into your model ? I don't know of any, and I'm not sure how they would be supported. erm, this is a MUST. You MUST factor the hardware VLANs and be totaly 802.1q compliant

Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumissionpolicy!)

2001-01-07 Thread Ben Greear
;- I can show a range w/out much trouble. I think I'll also tweak the hash code to just do linear lookups if the number of interfaces is below some number, (probably 20, or whatever the numbers show is good...) Ben -- Ben Greear ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.candelatech.com Author

Re: routable interfaces WAS( Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup(DoesNOT meet Linus' sumission policy!)

2001-01-07 Thread Ben Greear
d! It may be easier to fix other problems with many interface/net_devices than cram a whole other virtual net_device structure (with many duplicate functionalities found in the current net_device). Ben -- Ben Greear ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.candelatech.com Author of ScryMUD: scry.wanfea

Re: routable interfaces WAS( Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup(DoesNOTmeet Linus' sumission policy!)

2001-01-07 Thread Ben Greear
jamal wrote: On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, Ben Greear wrote: Hrm, what if they just made each IP-SEC interface a net_device? If they are a routable entity, with it's own IP address, it starts to look a lot like an interface/net_device. As in my response to Matti, i thing a netdevice

Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (New Benchmarks)

2001-01-07 Thread Ben Greear
, then go ahead and tell me now so that I can go back to hacking code and just include this patch with my VLAN patch. Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.candelatech.com Author of ScryMUD: scry.wanfear.com (Released under GPL) http://scry.wanfear.com

Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!) (Benchmarks)

2001-01-06 Thread Ben Greear
ths are worth optimizing for. The patch has been written, so even if it helps just a little more than it hurts, it might be worth including. Of course, it may actually hurt more than help. I'd be very interested in lucid arguments as to why adding the patch would actually be worse than not adding it,

Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumissionpolicy!)

2001-01-06 Thread Ben Greear
gest benchmarks you consider valid. Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.candelatech.com Author of ScryMUD: scry.wanfear.com (Released under GPL) http://scry.wanfear.com http://scry.wanfear.com/~greear - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!)

2001-01-06 Thread Ben Greear
Andi Kleen wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 02:33:27PM -0700, Ben Greear wrote: > > I'm hoping that I can get a few comments on this code. It was added > > to (significantly) speed up things like 'ifconfig -a' when running with > > 4000 or so VLAN devices. It should a

Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!)

2001-01-06 Thread Ben Greear
Chris Wedgwood wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 02:33:27PM -0700, Ben Greear wrote: > > I'm hoping that I can get a few comments on this code. It was > added to (significantly) speed up things like 'ifconfig -a' when > running with 4000 or so VLAN devices. I

Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!)

2001-01-06 Thread Ben Greear
__fdl_register_netdevice(dev); +#endif *dp = dev; dev_hold(dev); dev->deadbeaf = 0; @@ -2468,7 +2776,10 @@ if (d == dev) { write_lock_bh(_base_lock); *dp = d->next; - write_unlock_bh(_b

[PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!)

2001-01-06 Thread Ben Greear
write_unlock_bh(_base_lock); break; } --- 2777,2784 write_lock_bh(_base_lock); *dp = d->next; ! #ifdef BENS_FAST_DEV_LOOKUP ! __fdl_unregister_netdevice(dev);

Re: Linux-2.4.x patch submission policy (what about the -AC series?)

2001-01-06 Thread Ben Greear
Sounds like a perfectly valid argument to me. Since Alan Cox's branch seems to take on some of the more experimental stuff, perhaps it could be used as an outlet for the pent-up patches untill 2.5 comes out? Alan, could you elucidate your policy for accepting patches into the -ac series? Than

Re: Linux-2.4.x patch submission policy (what about the -AC series?)

2001-01-06 Thread Ben Greear
d argument to me. Since Alan Cox's branch seems to take on some of the more experimental stuff, perhaps it could be used as an outlet for the pent-up patches untill 2.5 comes out? Alan, could you elucidate your policy for accepting patches into the -ac series? Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear ([EMAIL

[PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!)

2001-01-06 Thread Ben Greear
; ! write_unlock_bh(dev_base_lock); break; } --- 2777,2784 write_lock_bh(dev_base_lock); *dp = d-next; ! #ifdef BENS_FAST_DEV_LOOKUP ! __fdl_unregister_netdevice(dev); ! #endif !

Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!)

2001-01-06 Thread Ben Greear
__fdl_unregister_netdevice(dev); +#endif + write_unlock_bh(dev_base_lock); break; } } -- Ben Greear ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.candelatech.com Author of ScryMUD: scry.wanfear.com (Released under GPL) http:

Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!)

2001-01-06 Thread Ben Greear
Chris Wedgwood wrote: On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 02:33:27PM -0700, Ben Greear wrote: I'm hoping that I can get a few comments on this code. It was added to (significantly) speed up things like 'ifconfig -a' when running with 4000 or so VLAN devices. It should also help other

Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!)

2001-01-06 Thread Ben Greear
Andi Kleen wrote: On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 02:33:27PM -0700, Ben Greear wrote: I'm hoping that I can get a few comments on this code. It was added to (significantly) speed up things like 'ifconfig -a' when running with 4000 or so VLAN devices. It should also help other instances

Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumissionpolicy!)

2001-01-06 Thread Ben Greear
hmarks you consider valid. Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.candelatech.com Author of ScryMUD: scry.wanfear.com (Released under GPL) http://scry.wanfear.com http://scry.wanfear.com/~greear - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscri

Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!) (Benchmarks)

2001-01-06 Thread Ben Greear
than it hurts, it might be worth including. Of course, it may actually hurt more than help. I'd be very interested in lucid arguments as to why adding the patch would actually be worse than not adding it, not just why I'm lame for considering it *grin* :) -- Ben Greear ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http

[PATCH] 8139too.c patch to allow setting of MAC address to actually work.

2001-01-04 Thread Ben Greear
Becker */ RTL_W32_F (MAC0 + 0, cpu_to_le32 (*(u32 *) (dev->dev_addr + 0))); RTL_W32_F (MAC0 + 4, cpu_to_le32 (*(u32 *) (dev->dev_addr + 4))); The 2.2.18 driver is broken too, but I think Donald is going to send the fixes for it. Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear ([EMAIL PROT

[PATCH] 8139too.c patch to allow setting of MAC address to actually work.

2001-01-04 Thread Ben Greear
*/ RTL_W32_F (MAC0 + 0, cpu_to_le32 (*(u32 *) (dev-dev_addr + 0))); RTL_W32_F (MAC0 + 4, cpu_to_le32 (*(u32 *) (dev-dev_addr + 4))); The 2.2.18 driver is broken too, but I think Donald is going to send the fixes for it. Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.candelatech.com

Re: NFS root doesn't work with 2.2.18.

2001-01-02 Thread Ben Greear
NFIG_NLS_ISO8859_14 is not set # CONFIG_NLS_ISO8859_15 is not set # CONFIG_NLS_KOI8_R is not set # # Console drivers # CONFIG_VGA_CONSOLE=y # CONFIG_VIDEO_SELECT is not set # CONFIG_MDA_CONSOLE is not set # CONFIG_FB is not set # # Sound # # CONFIG_SOUND is not set # # Kernel hacking

Re: NFS root doesn't work with 2.2.18.

2001-01-02 Thread Ben Greear
SO8859_15 is not set # CONFIG_NLS_KOI8_R is not set # # Console drivers # CONFIG_VGA_CONSOLE=y # CONFIG_VIDEO_SELECT is not set # CONFIG_MDA_CONSOLE is not set # CONFIG_FB is not set # # Sound # # CONFIG_SOUND is not set # # Kernel hacking # CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ=y -- Ben Greear ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.ca

How to programatically determine if policy-based routing is compiled into the kernel?

2000-12-06 Thread Ben Greear
, but an ioctl or similar call would be OK. I'd even settle for some other tool, like 'ip', if I could just figure out what commands to tell it. Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.candelatech.com Author of ScryMUD: scry.wanfear.com (Released under GPL) http

How to programatically determine if policy-based routing is compiled into the kernel?

2000-12-06 Thread Ben Greear
, but an ioctl or similar call would be OK. I'd even settle for some other tool, like 'ip', if I could just figure out what commands to tell it. Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.candelatech.com Author of ScryMUD: scry.wanfear.com (Released under GPL) http

procfs question: How many files are supported?

2000-10-14 Thread Ben Greear
of files that you can add to procfs in a single directory? Suggestions welcome... Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.candelatech.com Author of ScryMUD: scry.wanfear.com (Released under GPL) http://scry.wanfear.com http://scry.wanfear.com/~greear

procfs question: How many files are supported?

2000-10-14 Thread Ben Greear
of files that you can add to procfs in a single directory? Suggestions welcome... Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.candelatech.com Author of ScryMUD: scry.wanfear.com (Released under GPL) http://scry.wanfear.com http://scry.wanfear.com/~greear

ANNOUNCE: Linux 802.1Q VLAN 0.0.13 released.

2000-10-11 Thread Ben Greear
rful, and send the code back to me! vconfig.c has been converted to C code now, instead of C++. Thanks to MATHIEU. Significantly cleaned up the code w/out decreasing any useful functionality, I believe. -- Ben Greear ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

ANNOUNCE: Linux 802.1Q VLAN 0.0.13 released.

2000-10-11 Thread Ben Greear
, and send the code back to me! vconfig.c has been converted to C code now, instead of C++. Thanks to MATHIEU. Significantly cleaned up the code w/out decreasing any useful functionality, I believe. -- Ben Greear ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http

<    1   2   3   4   5