Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfs: clean up xfs_dir2_leaf_addname

On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 09:22:32AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > From: Darrick J. Wong > > Remove typedefs and consolidate local variable initialization. > > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong Reviewed-by: Bill O'Donnell > --- > fs/xfs/libxfs/x

Re: [PATCH 1/2] xfs: zero initialize highstale and lowstale in xfs_dir2_leaf_addname

uninitialized stack areas. > > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong Reviewed-by: Bill O'Donnell > --- > fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_dir2_leaf.c |4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_dir2_leaf.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_dir2_leaf.c

Re: [PATCH] xfs: substitute spaces with tabs

Bianchi > --- looks fine. Reviewed-by: Bill O'Donnell > fs/xfs/xfs_attr_list.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_attr_list.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_attr_list.c > index f9ca801..a580340 100644 > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_attr_list.c >

Re: [PATCH] xfs: substitute spaces with tabs

Bianchi > --- looks fine. Reviewed-by: Bill O'Donnell > fs/xfs/xfs_attr_list.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_attr_list.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_attr_list.c > index f9ca801..a580340 100644 > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_attr_list.c >

Re: [PATCH] tests/xfs/040: document purpose

> this test to pass. This is not trivial from the current description > so document this. > > Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <mcg...@kernel.org> Looks good... Reviewed-by: Bill O'Donnell <bill...@redhat.com> > --- > tests/xfs/040 | 5 + > 1 file changed, 5 i

Re: [PATCH] tests/xfs/040: document purpose

> this test to pass. This is not trivial from the current description > so document this. > > Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez Looks good... Reviewed-by: Bill O'Donnell > --- > tests/xfs/040 | 5 + > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/test

Re: [PATCH] xfs: do not call xfs_buf_hash_destroy on a NULL pag

On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 11:04:42PM +, Colin Ian King wrote: > On 20/01/17 20:47, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 01:26:12PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: > >> On 1/20/17 8:26 AM, Colin King wrote: > >>> From: Colin Ian King > >>> > >>> If pag cannot

Re: [PATCH] xfs: do not call xfs_buf_hash_destroy on a NULL pag

On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 11:04:42PM +, Colin Ian King wrote: > On 20/01/17 20:47, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 01:26:12PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: > >> On 1/20/17 8:26 AM, Colin King wrote: > >>> From: Colin Ian King > >>> > >>> If pag cannot be allocated, the current

Re: [AppArmor 00/44] AppArmor security module overview

am tree. | | Believe what you will. Crispin has been working with LSM from the | inception those many years ago. He's been working on getting this | module in for over a year. If you don't like his module go write | your own and put him out of business. Now this is getting really boring. See ab

Re: [AppArmor 00/44] AppArmor security module overview

go write | your own and put him out of business. Now this is getting really boring. See above comment. Can't we just stay on point? -- Bill O'Donnell SGI [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More

Re: [PATCH] Implement file posix capabilities

it? I realize with SELinux, one could achieve the goal, but as a stopgap, can capabilities be used to get there? Thanks, Bill -- Bill O'Donnell SGI [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More

Re: [PATCH] Implement file posix capabilities

it? I realize with SELinux, one could achieve the goal, but as a stopgap, can capabilities be used to get there? Thanks, Bill -- Bill O'Donnell SGI [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo

Re: [PATCH] Implement file posix capabilities

On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 04:57:07PM -0600, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: | Quoting Bill O'Donnell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): | > The memory fault when setfcaps is run as noted in #4 below also occurs | > on RHEL5 IA64 (2.6.18 kernel-2.6.18-1.2747.el5 with Serge's capability patch, | > and Kaigai's

Re: [PATCH] Implement file posix capabilities

On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 04:57:07PM -0600, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: | Quoting Bill O'Donnell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): | The memory fault when setfcaps is run as noted in #4 below also occurs | on RHEL5 IA64 (2.6.18 kernel-2.6.18-1.2747.el5 with Serge's capability patch, | and Kaigai's userspace tools

Re: [PATCH] Implement file posix capabilities

The memory fault when setfcaps is run as noted in #4 below also occurs on RHEL5 IA64 (2.6.18 kernel-2.6.18-1.2747.el5 with Serge's capability patch, and Kaigai's userspace tools installed). On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 02:40:13PM -0600, Bill O'Donnell wrote: | Once again, running into problems when

Re: [PATCH] Implement file posix capabilities

The memory fault when setfcaps is run as noted in #4 below also occurs on RHEL5 IA64 (2.6.18 kernel-2.6.18-1.2747.el5 with Serge's capability patch, and Kaigai's userspace tools installed). On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 02:40:13PM -0600, Bill O'Donnell wrote: | Once again, running into problems when

Re: [PATCH] Implement file posix capabilities

For more information on how to use this | > patch, Chris Friedhoff has posted a nice page at | > http://www.friedhoff.org/fscaps.html. | > | > Changelog: | > Nov 27: | > Incorporate fixes from Andrew Morton | > (security-introduce-file-caps-tweaks and | >

Re: [PATCH] Implement file posix capabilities

in | the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] | More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- Bill O'Donnell SGI [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info

Re: [PATCH 1/1] security: introduce fs caps

On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 10:49:23PM +0100, Chris Friedhoff wrote: | On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 11:06:34 -0600 | "Bill O'Donnell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | | - snip - | > | Probably, Bill didn't update libcap.so. | > No, I didn't... | > certify:~/libcap-1.10/progs # ls -altr

Re: [PATCH 1/1] security: introduce fs caps

On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 10:49:23PM +0100, Chris Friedhoff wrote: | On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 11:06:34 -0600 | Bill O'Donnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | | - snip - | | Probably, Bill didn't update libcap.so. | No, I didn't... | certify:~/libcap-1.10/progs # ls -altr /lib/libcap* | -rwxr-xr-x 1 root