I've enabled MUTEX and SPINLOCK DEBUG, this is what I get
[ cut here ]
WARNING: at /home/bongani/kernel/git/linux-2.6/kernel/mutex.c:134
mutex_lock_nested+0xc0/0x2a3()
Modules linked in: snd_seq_dummy snd_seq_oss snd_seq_midi_event snd_seq
binfmt_misc loop nls_cp437 vfat
I've enabled MUTEX and SPINLOCK DEBUG, this is what I get
[ cut here ]
WARNING: at /home/bongani/kernel/git/linux-2.6/kernel/mutex.c:134
mutex_lock_nested+0xc0/0x2a3()
Modules linked in: snd_seq_dummy snd_seq_oss snd_seq_midi_event snd_seq
binfmt_misc loop nls_cp437 vfat
More info add Ingo to CC, maybe he can explain what might cause such failure
in the mutex code (sorry Ingo, I need to bother you once more)
Ingo:
I got the oops bellow whilst using the radio functionality of the
bttv-drivers, nothing seems obvious except that I dies while calling
On Monday 18 February 2008 23:20:40 Bongani Hlope wrote:
> On Monday 18 February 2008 18:11:25 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > Have you tested Robert's patch?
>
> Sorry almost forgot, I have and it fixes the TV but not the radio.
>
> > I can't see anything wrong on bttv
On Monday 18 February 2008 18:11:25 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 10:36:19 +0200
>
> Bongani Hlope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The bttv driver seems to be experiencing problems in the 2.6.25-rcX
> > kernels. I have the divided by error that Ro
On Monday 18 February 2008 18:11:25 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 10:36:19 +0200
Bongani Hlope [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The bttv driver seems to be experiencing problems in the 2.6.25-rcX
kernels. I have the divided by error that Robert Fitzsimons has already
reported
On Monday 18 February 2008 23:20:40 Bongani Hlope wrote:
On Monday 18 February 2008 18:11:25 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Have you tested Robert's patch?
Sorry almost forgot, I have and it fixes the TV but not the radio.
I can't see anything wrong on bttv_g_tuner lock. I suspect
The bttv driver seems to be experiencing problems in the 2.6.25-rcX kernels. I
have the divided by error that Robert Fitzsimons has already reported (I'll
test his patch and see if it fixes it for me) and I have the following Oops
when I try to use the radio:
BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL
The bttv driver seems to be experiencing problems in the 2.6.25-rcX kernels. I
have the divided by error that Robert Fitzsimons has already reported (I'll
test his patch and see if it fixes it for me) and I have the following Oops
when I try to use the radio:
BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL
On Thursday 01 November 2007 22:32:38 Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 10:45:36 +0200
>
> Bongani Hlope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Booting with irqpoll works
> >
> > ls /proc/irq/21/ (with irqpoll)
> > ehci_hcd:usb1/ smp_affinity uhci_hcd:u
On Thursday 01 November 2007 22:32:38 Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 10:45:36 +0200
Bongani Hlope [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Booting with irqpoll works
ls /proc/irq/21/ (with irqpoll)
ehci_hcd:usb1/ smp_affinity uhci_hcd:usb2/ uhci_hcd:usb3/
uhci_hcd:usb4/
Disabling
Booting with irqpoll works
ls /proc/irq/21/ (with irqpoll)
ehci_hcd:usb1/ smp_affinity uhci_hcd:usb2/ uhci_hcd:usb3/ uhci_hcd:usb4/
irq 21: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
Call Trace:
[__report_bad_irq+56/124] __report_bad_irq+0x38/0x7c
[]
Booting with irqpoll works
ls /proc/irq/21/ (with irqpoll)
ehci_hcd:usb1/ smp_affinity uhci_hcd:usb2/ uhci_hcd:usb3/ uhci_hcd:usb4/
irq 21: nobody cared (try booting with the irqpoll option)
Call Trace:
IRQ [__report_bad_irq+56/124] __report_bad_irq+0x38/0x7c
IRQ [802622eb]
On Wednesday 26 September 2007 13:06:51 David Newall wrote:
> Alan Cox wrote:
> >>> The dot-dot entry in the root directory is interpreted to mean the
> >>> root directory itself. Thus, dot-dot cannot be used to access files
> >>> outside the subtree rooted at the root directory.
> >
> > Which is
On Wednesday 26 September 2007 13:06:51 David Newall wrote:
Alan Cox wrote:
The dot-dot entry in the root directory is interpreted to mean the
root directory itself. Thus, dot-dot cannot be used to access files
outside the subtree rooted at the root directory.
Which is behaviour chroot
On Wednesday 01 August 2007 03:04:07 Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Aug 2007 02:57:48 +0200 Bongani Hlope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > I'm not sure if the first email went through, resending without .config
> > attachment.
>
> It did come through, an
On Wednesday 01 August 2007 03:04:07 Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 1 Aug 2007 02:57:48 +0200 Bongani Hlope [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'm not sure if the first email went through, resending without .config
attachment.
It did come through, and I replied ;)
Thank you ;)
-
To unsubscribe from
Hi
I'm not sure if the first email went through, resending without .config
attachment.
I got this partial Oops on my work laptop (DELL D800), while using the linux
2.6.23-rc1 kernel. I've been using this kernel ever since it was released and
this is the first and only time it did not boot. It
Hi
I got this partial Oops on my work laptop (DELL D800), while using the linux
2.6.23-rc1 kernel. I've been using this kernel ever since it was released and
this is the first and only time it did not boot. It was around the time it
should have been trying to connect to my linksys wireless
Hi
I got this partial Oops on my work laptop (DELL D800), while using the linux
2.6.23-rc1 kernel. I've been using this kernel ever since it was released and
this is the first and only time it did not boot. It was around the time it
should have been trying to connect to my linksys wireless
Hi
I'm not sure if the first email went through, resending without .config
attachment.
I got this partial Oops on my work laptop (DELL D800), while using the linux
2.6.23-rc1 kernel. I've been using this kernel ever since it was released and
this is the first and only time it did not boot. It
On Monday 30 July 2007 23:51:42 Steven wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 16:29:55 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > OK, so here it goes again with a changelog:
> >
> > ---
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > Generally, sysdev_shutdown() should be called after the ACPI preparation
On Monday 30 July 2007 23:51:42 Steven wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 16:29:55 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
OK, so here it goes again with a changelog:
---
From: Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Generally, sysdev_shutdown() should be called after the ACPI preparation
for powering
On Thursday 26 July 2007 10:01:11 Rene Herman wrote:
> On 07/26/2007 09:08 AM, Bongani Hlope wrote:
> > On Thursday 26 July 2007 08:56:59 Rene Herman wrote:
> >> Great. Now concentrate on the "swpd" column, as it's the only thing
> >> relevant here. The fac
On Thursday 26 July 2007 08:56:59 Rene Herman wrote:
> On 07/26/2007 08:39 AM, Bongani Hlope wrote:
> > On Thursday 26 July 2007 05:59:53 Rene Herman wrote:
> >> So what's happening? If you sit down with a copy op "top" in one
> >> terminal and updatedb in ano
On Thursday 26 July 2007 05:59:53 Rene Herman wrote:
>
> Problem spot no. 1.
>
> RAM intensive? If I run updatedb here, it never grows itself beyond 2M.
> Yes, two. I'm certainly willing to accept that me and my systems are
> possibly not the reference but assuming I'm _very_ special hasn't done
On Thursday 26 July 2007 10:01:11 Rene Herman wrote:
On 07/26/2007 09:08 AM, Bongani Hlope wrote:
On Thursday 26 July 2007 08:56:59 Rene Herman wrote:
Great. Now concentrate on the swpd column, as it's the only thing
relevant here. The fact that an updatedb run fills/replaces caches
On Thursday 26 July 2007 05:59:53 Rene Herman wrote:
Problem spot no. 1.
RAM intensive? If I run updatedb here, it never grows itself beyond 2M.
Yes, two. I'm certainly willing to accept that me and my systems are
possibly not the reference but assuming I'm _very_ special hasn't done much
On Thursday 26 July 2007 08:56:59 Rene Herman wrote:
On 07/26/2007 08:39 AM, Bongani Hlope wrote:
On Thursday 26 July 2007 05:59:53 Rene Herman wrote:
So what's happening? If you sit down with a copy op top in one
terminal and updatedb in another, what does it show?
Just tested
On Thursday 14 June 2007 21:32:08 Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Jun 14, 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lennart Sorensen) wrote:
> > They let you have the code and make changes to it,
>
> Not to the software installed in the device.
So now you want access to all the software that is installed in their
On Thursday 14 June 2007 21:55:09 Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Jun 14, 2007, Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, Diego Calleja wrote:
> >> And the FSF is trying to control the design and licensing of
> >> hardware throught the influence of their software.
>
> It's
On Thursday 14 June 2007 02:55:52 Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Jun 13, 2007, Bongani Hlope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thursday 14 June 2007 01:49:23 Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> >> if you distribute copies of such a program, [...]
> >> you must give the recipi
On Thursday 14 June 2007 02:55:52 Alexandre Oliva wrote:
On Jun 13, 2007, Bongani Hlope [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 14 June 2007 01:49:23 Alexandre Oliva wrote:
if you distribute copies of such a program, [...]
you must give the recipients all the rights that you have
So, TiVo
On Thursday 14 June 2007 21:55:09 Alexandre Oliva wrote:
On Jun 14, 2007, Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, Diego Calleja wrote:
And the FSF is trying to control the design and licensing of
hardware throught the influence of their software.
It's not. It's only
On Thursday 14 June 2007 21:32:08 Alexandre Oliva wrote:
On Jun 14, 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lennart Sorensen) wrote:
They let you have the code and make changes to it,
Not to the software installed in the device.
So now you want access to all the software that is installed in their device?
On Thursday 14 June 2007 01:49:23 Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Jun 13, 2007, Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The fact is, Tivo didn't take those rights away from you, yet the FSF
> > says that what Tivo did was "against the spirit". That's *bullshit*.
>
> Oh, good, let's take this
On Thursday 14 June 2007 01:49:23 Alexandre Oliva wrote:
On Jun 13, 2007, Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The fact is, Tivo didn't take those rights away from you, yet the FSF
says that what Tivo did was against the spirit. That's *bullshit*.
Oh, good, let's take this one.
if
On Friday 30 March 2007 05:49:14 Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Mar 30 2007 11:37, Conke Hu wrote:
> > Is it possible to use C++ in linux kernel module? how?
> > I've tested but failed, there is an unknown symbol in the .o file from
> > c++ source code.
>
> You answered it yourself. Linux does not
On Friday 30 March 2007 05:49:14 Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Mar 30 2007 11:37, Conke Hu wrote:
Is it possible to use C++ in linux kernel module? how?
I've tested but failed, there is an unknown symbol in the .o file from
c++ source code.
You answered it yourself. Linux does not have a C++
On Monday 29 August 2005 12:28 pm, you wrote:
> Hi,
>
8<
>
> Update, with stable 2.6.13. I get nearly the same behavior.
>
I haven't tried 2.6.13 yet (still downloading), could you first try this (with
yor last working kernel, since you seem to have a problem with 2.6.13)
echo 0 >
On Monday 29 August 2005 12:28 pm, you wrote:
Hi,
8
Update, with stable 2.6.13. I get nearly the same behavior.
I haven't tried 2.6.13 yet (still downloading), could you first try this (with
yor last working kernel, since you seem to have a problem with 2.6.13)
echo 0
On Wednesday 06 July 2005 08:34 am, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 14:12 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Bongani Hlope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > I haven't tested 2.6.12.2 but the problem was introduced around
> > > 2.6.11-
On Wednesday 06 July 2005 08:34 am, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 14:12 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
Bongani Hlope [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I haven't tested 2.6.12.2 but the problem was introduced around
2.6.11-mm1 and
found its way to 2.6.12-rcX. First try to run
On Tuesday 05 July 2005 10:36 am, Sven Rudolph wrote:
> Bongani Hlope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
8<
> > Hi Linus
> >
> > I just tested, 2.6.12-rc6 minus
> > randomisation-top-of-stack-randomization.patch Works For Me (tm)
>
> Sorry, I didn't fo
On Tuesday 05 July 2005 10:36 am, Sven Rudolph wrote:
Bongani Hlope [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
8
Hi Linus
I just tested, 2.6.12-rc6 minus
randomisation-top-of-stack-randomization.patch Works For Me (tm)
Sorry, I didn't follow the original discussion: Is this problem
expected
45 matches
Mail list logo
