Re: Wasting our Freedom

2007-09-18 Thread Can E. Acar
Lennart Sorensen wrote: > On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 11:55:29AM -0700, Can E. Acar wrote: >> Well, they can add their names *anywhere* in the whole file, *except* >> these two lines. See, these lines have a whole different meaning >> when it comes to laws. When they make su

Re: Wasting our Freedom

2007-09-18 Thread Can E. Acar
Theodore Tso wrote: > On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 03:06:37PM -0700, Can E. Acar wrote: >> The only remaining issue is whether Nick & Jiri have enough >> original contributions to the code to be added to the Copyright. >> >> I believe this needs to be resolved between Re

Re: Wasting our Freedom

2007-09-17 Thread Can E. Acar
Theodore Tso wrote: > On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 09:23:41PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote: >> Because they put their copyright plus license on code that they barely >> modified. If they would have added substantial work into the OpenHAL code >> and by doing that creating something new I would not say muc

Re: Wasting our Freedom

2007-09-16 Thread Can E. Acar
Daniel Hazelton wrote: > On Sunday 16 September 2007 23:00:09 Can E. Acar wrote: [snip] >> Theo summarized the latest situation here, some days ago: >> >> http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=118963284332223&w=2 >> >> and here is a very brief summary: &

Re: Wasting our Freedom

2007-09-16 Thread Can E. Acar
Daniel Hazelton wrote: > On Sunday 16 September 2007 14:48:47 Can E. Acar wrote: [snip] >> >> First, these developers got questionable advice from senior Linux kernel >> developers, and SLFC (which is closely related to FSF) in the process. > > IIRC, the advice was &qu

Re: Wasting our Freedom

2007-09-16 Thread Can E. Acar
On Sunday 16 September 2007 15:23:25 Daniel Hazelton wrote: > On Sunday 16 September 2007 05:17:53 J.C. Roberts wrote: >> On Sunday 16 September 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote: >> > J.C. Roberts wrote: >> > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=118857712529898&w=2 >> > >> > Link with outdated info. >> >