Re: [PATCH 3/3] Time to make CONFIG_PARAVIRT non-experimental.

2007-09-20 Thread Charles N Wyble
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Satyam Sharma wrote: > > On Tue, 18 Sep 2007, Charles N Wyble wrote: >> Andi Kleen wrote: >>> Besides it's bad taste and taste is very important. >> Well it's bad taste for you (one person). > > FWIW, my

Re: [PATCH 3/3] Time to make CONFIG_PARAVIRT non-experimental.

2007-09-18 Thread Charles N Wyble
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Andi Kleen wrote: > >> Why is making something default y a bad idea? >> Those most likely to care can turn it off. Is there a harmful effect >> from leaving it on if its not being used? > > Running yes "" | make oldconfig to upgrade kernel co

Re: [PATCH 2/3] Consolidate host virtualization support under Virtualization menu

2007-09-18 Thread Charles N Wyble
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > Charles N Wyble wrote: >> >> Zachary Amsden wrote: >> > >>> Virtualization is completely different, and probably needs separate >>> server (kvm, lguest) and client (kvm, lgue

Re: [PATCH 3/3] Time to make CONFIG_PARAVIRT non-experimental.

2007-09-18 Thread Charles N Wyble
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Andi Kleen wrote: > On Friday 14 September 2007 07:21, Rusty Russell wrote: >> It's pretty widely used, > > Is it? By whom? > >> and the distributions will turn it on. > > That's no reason to make it default y. Please undo that. default y > is ne

Re: [PATCH 2/3] Consolidate host virtualization support under Virtualization menu

2007-09-17 Thread Charles N Wyble
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Zachary Amsden wrote: > > Virtualization is completely different, and probably needs separate > server (kvm, lguest) and client (kvm, lguest, xen, vmware) sections in > it's menu. So what is the differentiation between client and server above? Just