for changing more than one thing at once.
--
Chris Murphy
This appears to be new in 4.19 rc5. But it doesn't happen every boot.
Details and attachments in the bug:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=201227
[ 35.502605] f29h.local kernel: pci_bus :02: Allocating resources
[ 51.172922] f29h.local kernel: thunderbolt :03:00.0:
This appears to be new in 4.19 rc5. But it doesn't happen every boot.
Details and attachments in the bug:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=201227
[ 35.502605] f29h.local kernel: pci_bus :02: Allocating resources
[ 51.172922] f29h.local kernel: thunderbolt :03:00.0:
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 9:38 AM, Chris Murphy <li...@colorremedies.com> wrote:
> Yesterday I saw oom killer knocking off processes during a simple cp
> -a from one Btrfs to another, in a VM, with kernel
> 4.8.0-0.rc0.git3.1.fc25.x86_64. The call trace looks different than
> Marku
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 9:38 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> Yesterday I saw oom killer knocking off processes during a simple cp
> -a from one Btrfs to another, in a VM, with kernel
> 4.8.0-0.rc0.git3.1.fc25.x86_64. The call trace looks different than
> Markus' so I'm not sure it's the
though. According ot koji
this is Linux v4.7-6438-gc624c86
This is 'journalctl -o short-monotonic -b-4 -k'
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B_2Asp8DGjJ9ZC1JSDJnaWpnSEE
Chris Murphy
though. According ot koji
this is Linux v4.7-6438-gc624c86
This is 'journalctl -o short-monotonic -b-4 -k'
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B_2Asp8DGjJ9ZC1JSDJnaWpnSEE
Chris Murphy
= is a bind mount behind the scene, I'm
not sure the mount info code distinguishes between bind mounts.
At the moment, this is something of a secret decoder ring where if you
see subvolid=5 first, then anything after that other than / is just
not true (can't be). Hence probably why both subvolid and subvol are
listed for now; you kinda have to parse them both.
--
Chris Murphy
ot sure the mount info code distinguishes between bind mounts.
At the moment, this is something of a secret decoder ring where if you
see subvolid=5 first, then anything after that other than / is just
not true (can't be). Hence probably why both subvolid and subvol are
listed for now; you kinda have to parse them both.
--
Chris Murphy
an XFS test
for both balance+convert and ext4 convert? If not, shouldn't there be?
It's not a data loss bug but Btrfs is in a transitional stretch where
functionality loss bugs are no longer minor. (I'd look but I'm lazy
and xfs tests doesn't appear to be indexed.)
--
Chris Murphy
--
To unsubscribe
for both balance+convert and ext4 convert? If not, shouldn't there be?
It's not a data loss bug but Btrfs is in a transitional stretch where
functionality loss bugs are no longer minor. (I'd look but I'm lazy
and xfs tests doesn't appear to be indexed.)
--
Chris Murphy
--
To unsubscribe from
k's rc (which is rc5) if you
can accept a bit more risk for testing purposes.
--
Chris Murphy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Ple
It's known.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/3/7/41
--
Chris Murphy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
week's rc (which is rc5) if you
can accept a bit more risk for testing purposes.
--
Chris Murphy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please
]()
It's known.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/3/7/41
--
Chris Murphy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http
ttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062833#c24
Which points to this patch:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev=139233546723342=raw
Chris Murphy--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majo
/show_bug.cgi?id=1062833#c24
Which points to this patch:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdevm=139233546723342q=raw
Chris Murphy--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org
n if the hardware I have has a
unique problem, or if it's a model specific behavior.
Chris Murphy--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
n is merely limited battery life, about 1 hour. All testing is
always done with power connected.
Chris Murphy--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
connected.
Chris Murphy--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
a model specific behavior.
Chris Murphy--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
On Oct 7, 2013, at 5:42 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 10/02/2013 10:24 AM, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
>
>>> From 4451da32414080bd0563ee9e061f19bf90463cc5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Henrik Rydberg
>> Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 19:15:03 +0200
>> Subject: [PATCH] applesmc remedy take 2
>>
>>
On Oct 7, 2013, at 5:42 PM, Guenter Roeck li...@roeck-us.net wrote:
On 10/02/2013 10:24 AM, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
From 4451da32414080bd0563ee9e061f19bf90463cc5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Henrik Rydberg rydb...@euromail.se
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 19:15:03 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] applesmc
On Oct 2, 2013, at 2:59 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 12:33:00PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>
>> On Oct 2, 2013, at 12:02 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 07:24:10PM +0200, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
>>>>
> have not had the time to check this very deeply myself:
>>
> I like this patch much more than the previous patch. Chris, can you test it ?
Yes. Building now. What kernel message should I be looking for? At least on
2011 and 2012 laptops I have yet to see an Oops related to smc. The kernel with
previous patch at least is not causing problems on them so far, which works
well as I can test more on the 2008 model.
Chris Murphy--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
laptops I have yet to see an Oops related to smc. The kernel with
previous patch at least is not causing problems on them so far, which works
well as I can test more on the 2008 model.
Chris Murphy--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message
On Oct 2, 2013, at 2:59 PM, Guenter Roeck li...@roeck-us.net wrote:
On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 12:33:00PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Oct 2, 2013, at 12:02 PM, Guenter Roeck li...@roeck-us.net wrote:
On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 07:24:10PM +0200, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
On Wed, Oct 02, 2013
On Oct 1, 2013, at 9:51 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 07:09:26PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>
>> On Oct 1, 2013, at 10:24 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 09:33:13AM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>>>
>
On Oct 1, 2013, at 10:24 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 09:33:13AM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>
>> On Oct 1, 2013, at 9:19 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 12:55:26PM +0200, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
>>>>>
On Oct 1, 2013, at 9:19 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 12:55:26PM +0200, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
Warning message triggered with 3.12.0-0.rc3.git0.1.fc21.x86_64.
[ 10.886016] applesmc: key count changed from 261 to 1174405121
>>>
>>> Explains the crash,
On Oct 1, 2013, at 9:19 AM, Guenter Roeck li...@roeck-us.net wrote:
On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 12:55:26PM +0200, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
Warning message triggered with 3.12.0-0.rc3.git0.1.fc21.x86_64.
[ 10.886016] applesmc: key count changed from 261 to 1174405121
Explains the crash, but
On Oct 1, 2013, at 10:24 AM, Guenter Roeck li...@roeck-us.net wrote:
On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 09:33:13AM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Oct 1, 2013, at 9:19 AM, Guenter Roeck li...@roeck-us.net wrote:
On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 12:55:26PM +0200, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
Warning message triggered
On Oct 1, 2013, at 9:51 PM, Guenter Roeck li...@roeck-us.net wrote:
On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 07:09:26PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Oct 1, 2013, at 10:24 AM, Guenter Roeck li...@roeck-us.net wrote:
On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 09:33:13AM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Oct 1, 2013, at 9:19
On Sep 27, 2013, at 5:33 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 09/27/2013 11:03 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>
>> On Sep 27, 2013, at 11:59 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 11:41:42AM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>>>
>>>&
On Sep 27, 2013, at 5:33 PM, Guenter Roeck li...@roeck-us.net wrote:
On 09/27/2013 11:03 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Sep 27, 2013, at 11:59 AM, Guenter Roeck li...@roeck-us.net wrote:
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 11:41:42AM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Sep 27, 2013, at 11:12 AM, Guenter
On Sep 27, 2013, at 11:12 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 12:21:04PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 2:34 AM, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
>> This suggests that initialization may be attempted more than once. The
>> key cache
>> is allocated only
On Sep 27, 2013, at 11:59 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 11:41:42AM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>
>> On Sep 27, 2013, at 11:12 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 12:21:04PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>>>> On Th
On Sep 27, 2013, at 11:59 AM, Guenter Roeck li...@roeck-us.net wrote:
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 11:41:42AM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Sep 27, 2013, at 11:12 AM, Guenter Roeck li...@roeck-us.net wrote:
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 12:21:04PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 2
On Sep 27, 2013, at 11:12 AM, Guenter Roeck li...@roeck-us.net wrote:
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 12:21:04PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 2:34 AM, Henrik Rydberg rydb...@euromail.se wrote:
This suggests that initialization may be attempted more than once. The
key cache
is
On Apr 5, 2013, at 2:35 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Chris Murphy
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Are they in 3.9.0-0.rc5.git2.1.f19? I'm seeing a regression from 3.8.5 with
>> the radeon driver not finding BIOS ROM as well.
>> https:/
On Apr 2, 2013, at 2:10 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Matthew Garrett
> wrote:
>> On Mon, 2013-04-01 at 11:39 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>>
>>> Chris still has problems (see
>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=927451), but I don't know
>>> whether
On Apr 2, 2013, at 2:10 PM, Bjorn Helgaas bhelg...@google.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Matthew Garrett
matthew.garr...@nebula.com wrote:
On Mon, 2013-04-01 at 11:39 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
Chris still has problems (see
On Apr 5, 2013, at 2:35 PM, Bjorn Helgaas bhelg...@google.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Chris Murphy bugzi...@colorremedies.com
wrote:
Are they in 3.9.0-0.rc5.git2.1.f19? I'm seeing a regression from 3.8.5 with
the radeon driver not finding BIOS ROM as well.
https
"fast recovery" behavior if you're at your critical number
of disks remaining or you lose the array upon a few seconds worth of subsequent
problems. So we kinda need context specific behavior.
Chris Murphy--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel"
recovery behavior if you're at your critical number
of disks remaining or you lose the array upon a few seconds worth of subsequent
problems. So we kinda need context specific behavior.
Chris Murphy--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message
ot; out the gate, something's
happened to it and now it's failing as you suspect.
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?276187-Raid-Locks-Up
Chris Murphy--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kern
, something's
happened to it and now it's failing as you suspect.
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?276187-Raid-Locks-Up
Chris Murphy--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info
47 matches
Mail list logo
