Regression: bcm4312 lp-phy device not recognized in 4.15 kernel

2018-01-29 Thread Chris Vine
I have an old netbook with a Broadcom bcm4312 802.11b/g lp-phy [14e4:4315] (rev 01) wifi device. It is no longer recognized in kernel 4.15: it works fine with the 4.14 kernel and earlier, with the b43 and ssb kernel modules. I cannot give any further information as there are no error messages log

Re: xt_recent broken in kernel 3.19.0 + PATCH

2015-02-12 Thread Chris Vine
On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 10:54:17 + Chris Vine wrote: [snip] > On further testing I see that that patch only solves the problem if > SSH_TRIES is set to a power of two boundary. You still get an error > loading the rule if it is anything else. I think there is something > wr

Re: xt_recent broken in kernel 3.19.0 + PATCH

2015-02-12 Thread Chris Vine
On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 10:26:16 + Chris Vine wrote: > On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 09:35:33 +0100 > Florian Westphal wrote: > > Cong Wang wrote: > > > (Cc'ing netdev and netfilter-devel lists) > > > > Thanks for forwarding. > > > > > > Chris Vi

Re: xt_recent broken in kernel 3.19.0 + PATCH

2015-02-12 Thread Chris Vine
On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 09:35:33 +0100 Florian Westphal wrote: > Cong Wang wrote: > > (Cc'ing netdev and netfilter-devel lists) > > Thanks for forwarding. > > > > Chris Vine wrote: > > >> iptables -D SSH_CHAIN -m conntrack --ctstate N

Re: xt_recent broken in kernel 3.19.0 + PATCH

2015-02-11 Thread Chris Vine
On Wed, 11 Feb 2015 09:28:34 + Chris Vine wrote: > With kernel 3.19.0, the following iptables rule, where SSH_TRIES is > set to 4: > > iptables -D SSH_CHAIN -m conntrack --ctstate NEW \ > -m recent --update --seconds $SSH_LOGIN_PERIOD --hitcount > $SSH_TRIES -j DROP &

xt_recent broken in kernel 3.19.0

2015-02-11 Thread Chris Vine
With kernel 3.19.0, the following iptables rule, where SSH_TRIES is set to 4: iptables -D SSH_CHAIN -m conntrack --ctstate NEW \ -m recent --update --seconds $SSH_LOGIN_PERIOD --hitcount $SSH_TRIES -j DROP generates this error message in syslog: kernel: xt_recent: hitcount (4) is larger

intel drm regression with linux-3.18-rc4 kernel

2014-11-11 Thread Chris Vine
Hi, There seems to be a regression with linux-3.18-rc4 using drm with i915 graphics on one of my machines, a crappy netbook which uses a Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/GMS/GME, 943/940GML Express Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 03) graphics controller, when using gnome-shell. The first time I

Re: [Rt2400-devel] 2.6.25-rc2 regression in rt61pci wireless driver

2008-02-22 Thread Chris Vine
On Fri, 2008-02-22 at 07:39 +, Chris Clayton wrote: > On Thursday 21 February 2008, Chris Vine wrote: [snip] > > > > Does the same happen with 2.0.14 under kernel 2.6.24? > > Unfortunately, a 2.6.24.2 tree with the drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00 directory > replaced w

Re: [Rt2400-devel] 2.6.25-rc2 regression in rt61pci wireless driver

2008-02-21 Thread Chris Vine
On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 21:16 +, Chris Vine wrote: > On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 21:50 +0100, Ivo van Doorn wrote: > [snip] > > On Wednesday 20 February 2008, Chris Vine wrote: > > > I did that yesterday and it just reported a kernel panic on the terminal > > > with the

Re: [Rt2400-devel] 2.6.25-rc2 regression in rt61pci wireless driver

2008-02-20 Thread Chris Vine
On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 21:50 +0100, Ivo van Doorn wrote: [snip] > On Wednesday 20 February 2008, Chris Vine wrote: > > I did that yesterday and it just reported a kernel panic on the terminal > > with the message: > > > > Kernel panic - not syncing: Aiee, killing int

Re: [Rt2400-devel] 2.6.25-rc2 regression in rt61pci wireless driver

2008-02-20 Thread Chris Vine
On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 11:05 -0500, Dan Williams wrote: > On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 23:04 +0000, Chris Vine wrote: > > On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 20:46 +0100, Ivo van Doorn wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > [added rt2400-devel (rt2x00 development mailinglist) to the CC

Re: [Rt2400-devel] 2.6.25-rc2 regression in rt61pci wireless driver

2008-02-19 Thread Chris Vine
On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 20:46 +0100, Ivo van Doorn wrote: > Hi, > > [added rt2400-devel (rt2x00 development mailinglist) to the CC list.] > > > > > > I have a series of tests I would like to request from you, > > > > > you mentioned you already enabled debugfs, and that is just what we > > > > > n