Am Sonntag, 3. Februar 2008 schrieb Jack Byer:
> PAX: modprobe:752, uid/euid: 0/0, invalid execution attempt at
This looks like an issue with PAX - [EMAIL PROTECTED] might be a
better list to ask.
Christian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body
Am Sonntag, 3. Februar 2008 schrieb Jack Byer:
PAX: modprobe:752, uid/euid: 0/0, invalid execution attempt at
This looks like an issue with PAX - [EMAIL PROTECTED] might be a
better list to ask.
Christian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of
On Wednesday 30 March 2005 15:00, Yves Crespin wrote:
> 1/ is-it possible to *really* be synchronize. I prefer to have a blocked
> write() than use cache and get swap!
Try to mount with the sync option.
> 2/ is-it possible to disable cache disk ?
your copy tool has to support/use O_DIRECT
-
To
On Friday 11 February 2005 07:46, Greg KH wrote:
> And finally, even if you do use udevstart to manager /sbin/hotplug
> events, you still need a module autoloader program. This package
> provides executables for that problem, if you don't want to (or you
> can't) use the existing linux-hotplug
I attached a Toshiba DVD-ROM at the ASUS A7V133 Promise controller.
The highest transfer mode I can use is Multiword DMA 2, though I activated
the DMA-Option in the IDE-kernel configuration.
>hdparm -i /dev/hde
/dev/hde:
Model=TOSHIBA DVD-ROM SD-M1502, FwRev=1008, SerialNo=2100807146
I attached a Toshiba DVD-ROM at the ASUS A7V133 Promise controller.
The highest transfer mode I can use is Multiword DMA 2, though I activated
the DMA-Option in the IDE-kernel configuration.
hdparm -i /dev/hde
/dev/hde:
Model=TOSHIBA DVD-ROM SD-M1502, FwRev=1008, SerialNo=2100807146
> I'm certainly willing to provide any data it's decided is necessary to
> collect to make the correlations. I'll even volunteer to be the
.
> bit different - I have the hard drive on the promise interface (ide2) and
If possible, can you remove the hard disc from the promise and attach it on
I'm certainly willing to provide any data it's decided is necessary to
collect to make the correlations. I'll even volunteer to be the
.
bit different - I have the hard drive on the promise interface (ide2) and
If possible, can you remove the hard disc from the promise and attach it on
the
> With DMA (UDMA Mode 5) enabled, my machine crashes on kernel versions
> from 2.4.3-ac7 onwards up to 2.4.5 right up to 2.4.5-ac13. 2.4.3 vanilla
> and 2.4.3-ac6 are completely stable. -ac7 of course is when a load of
> VIA fixes were done. :-}
I encountered the same problem after 2.4.3-ac6.
>
With DMA (UDMA Mode 5) enabled, my machine crashes on kernel versions
from 2.4.3-ac7 onwards up to 2.4.5 right up to 2.4.5-ac13. 2.4.3 vanilla
and 2.4.3-ac6 are completely stable. -ac7 of course is when a load of
VIA fixes were done. :-}
I encountered the same problem after 2.4.3-ac6.
CPU:
if I plan to use no swap. I have enough memory installed for
my purposes and every swapping operation can do only one thing: slowing down
the system.
Is there a different behaviour if I completely disable swap?
greetings
Christian Bornträger
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
> On a side question: does Linux support swap-files in addition to
> sawp-partitions? Even if that has a performance penalty, when the system
> is swapping performance is dead anyway.
Yes.
A possible solution could be:
> dd if=/dev/zero of=/swap bs=1M count=
> mkswap /swap
> swapon /swap
On a side question: does Linux support swap-files in addition to
sawp-partitions? Even if that has a performance penalty, when the system
is swapping performance is dead anyway.
Yes.
A possible solution could be:
dd if=/dev/zero of=/swap bs=1M count=whatever you like in MB
mkswap /swap
if I plan to use no swap. I have enough memory installed for
my purposes and every swapping operation can do only one thing: slowing down
the system.
Is there a different behaviour if I completely disable swap?
greetings
Christian Bornträger
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
with
2.4.5.
So I __guess__ that the promise controller in combination with the VIA PCI
Interface leads to some trouble. I will do some further investigations, to
find out, if the promise controller was my problem.
Just ask if you need more information.
greetings
Christian Bornträger
with
2.4.5.
So I __guess__ that the promise controller in combination with the VIA PCI
Interface leads to some trouble. I will do some further investigations, to
find out, if the promise controller was my problem.
Just ask if you need more information.
greetings
Christian Bornträger
out-of-memory (OOM) kill. Check your log files.
(var/log/messages but can vary on some distributions)
12 MB of RAM is not enough for Kernel 2.4.4 and several gcc runs, as some
gcc optimizations have complexity of O(n^2) or higher.
greetings
Christian Bornträger
-
To unsubscribe from this l
. Check your log files.
(var/log/messages but can vary on some distributions)
12 MB of RAM is not enough for Kernel 2.4.4 and several gcc runs, as some
gcc optimizations have complexity of O(n^2) or higher.
greetings
Christian Bornträger
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
lp you finding the problem.
Unfortunately I have only a VIA-based Athlon system and not a S/390
greetings
Christian Bornträger
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http:/
finding the problem.
Unfortunately I have only a VIA-based Athlon system and not a S/390
greetings
Christian Bornträger
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo
is
group, but now I am not sure.
Can you try and mail me if the Kernel 2.4.3 (without any ac patch) is stable
with your system even if you use autotune? "Downgrade" to this kernel works
fine for me.
greetings
Christian Bornträger
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "uns
> Mandrake 8's kernel comes with i586 CPU support, it is alredy known it
> works. Remember that the instability occurs only when Athlon optimizations
> are used.
You are right.
But I like to point out that on my Athlon kernel 2.4.3 is working fine.
The first kernel I face problems is 2.4.3-ac7.
>Maybe, but the IWILL board is the only one we've heard about problems with.
I have also stability problems with an ASUS A7V133. I already have the
1004-d2 bios which should fix the VIA IDE problems. But my hard drives are
connected to the promise controller of the board. Only 2 CD-drives are on
Maybe, but the IWILL board is the only one we've heard about problems with.
I have also stability problems with an ASUS A7V133. I already have the
1004-d2 bios which should fix the VIA IDE problems. But my hard drives are
connected to the promise controller of the board. Only 2 CD-drives are on
Mandrake 8's kernel comes with i586 CPU support, it is alredy known it
works. Remember that the instability occurs only when Athlon optimizations
are used.
You are right.
But I like to point out that on my Athlon kernel 2.4.3 is working fine.
The first kernel I face problems is 2.4.3-ac7. I
not sure.
Can you try and mail me if the Kernel 2.4.3 (without any ac patch) is stable
with your system even if you use autotune? Downgrade to this kernel works
fine for me.
greetings
Christian Bornträger
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body
26 matches
Mail list logo
