On Sat, Nov 11, 2000, Igmar Palsenberg wrote:
>
> > > It ran out of memory. The file got sent fine after I got rid of
> > > all the memory-consumers. Looks like a sendmail bug where they
> > > expect to load a whole file into memory all at once before sending
> > > it. I always thought you could
On Fri, Nov 10, 2000, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
> I have dual T1 lines going into the box, and I just added a 4-way ADSL
> circuit as well (4 x 550K). Claus claimed there were TCPIP timeout bugs
Please DON'T quote me wrong. This is getting very annoying.
Is that your way to spread rumours and false
On Fri, Nov 10, 2000, David Lang wrote:
> how many CPUs in these high loadave boxes? unless you have a very
> impressive machine (8+SMP) the defaults should be plenty high.
>
> also I thought the QueueLA default was 8 and the RefuseLA was 12 or have
> they been bumped up since I last examined the
On Fri, Nov 10, 2000, Davide Libenzi wrote:
[Please use a MTA that sends the e-mail only once to a given machine,
we got three copies of this]
> On Fri, 10 Nov 2000, Claus Assmann wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 10, 2000, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
> > > Looks like your bug. As an FYI, sen
On Fri, Nov 10, 2000, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
> "Richard B. Johnson" wrote:
> > It ran out of memory. The file got sent fine after I got rid of
> > all the memory-consumers. Looks like a sendmail bug where they
> > expect to load a whole file into memory all at once before sending
> > it. I always
5 matches
Mail list logo
