[no subject]

2007-08-18 Thread Conke Hu
subscribe linux-kernel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[no subject]

2007-08-18 Thread Conke Hu
subscribe linux-kernel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[PATCH] nand/s3c2410.c: fix header file include path

2007-08-14 Thread Conke Hu
regs-nand.h and nand.h for s3c nand driver have been moved to plat-s3c/ dir. Signed-off-by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/s3c2410.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/s3c2410.c index 5fac4c4..b79a9cf 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/s3c2410.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/s3c2410.c @@

[PATCH] rtc-dev.c: remove to_rtc_device macro

2007-08-14 Thread Conke Hu
hi, According to rtc_dev_open() in file rtc-dev.c (see below), all the to_rtc_device macro in rtc file_operations functions should be removed, namely: "struct rtc_device *rtc = to_rtc_device(file->private_data);" should be modified to: "struct rtc_device *rtc = file->private_data;"

[PATCH] rtc-dev.c: remove to_rtc_device macro

2007-08-14 Thread Conke Hu
hi, According to rtc_dev_open() in file rtc-dev.c (see below), all the to_rtc_device macro in rtc file_operations functions should be removed, namely: struct rtc_device *rtc = to_rtc_device(file-private_data); should be modified to: struct rtc_device *rtc = file-private_data; to_rtc_device

[PATCH] nand/s3c2410.c: fix header file include path

2007-08-14 Thread Conke Hu
regs-nand.h and nand.h for s3c nand driver have been moved to plat-s3c/ dir. Signed-off-by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/s3c2410.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/s3c2410.c index 5fac4c4..b79a9cf 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/s3c2410.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/s3c2410.c @@

[PATCH] ahci.c: remove non-existing SB600 raid id (re-send)

2007-04-11 Thread Conke Hu
SB600 RAID and SB600 SATA is the same controller and share the same PCI ID 0x4380. There is no such PCI ID 0x4381. Signed-off-by: Conke Hu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - diff -Nur linux-2.6.21-rc6-git3.orig/drivers/ata/ahci.c linux-2.6.21-rc6-git3/drivers/ata/ahci.c --- linux-2.6.

Re: [PATCH] ahci.c: remove non-existing SB600 raid id

2007-04-11 Thread Conke Hu
On 4/11/07, Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Conke Hu wrote: >SB600 RAID and SB600 SATA is the same controller and share the > same PCI ID 0x4380. There is such PCI ID 0x4381. I assume 'no' is missing in the last sentence. :-) -- tejun Oh, sorry :( so, should I re-s

[PATCH] ahci.c: remove non-existing SB600 raid id

2007-04-11 Thread Conke Hu
SB600 RAID and SB600 SATA is the same controller and share the same PCI ID 0x4380. There is such PCI ID 0x4381. Signed-off-by: Conke Hu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - diff -Nur linux-2.6.21-rc6-git3.orig/drivers/ata/ahci.c linux-2.6.21-rc6-git3/drivers/ata/ahci.c --- linux-2.6.21-rc

[PATCH] ahci.c: remove non-existing SB600 raid id

2007-04-11 Thread Conke Hu
SB600 RAID and SB600 SATA is the same controller and share the same PCI ID 0x4380. There is such PCI ID 0x4381. Signed-off-by: Conke Hu [EMAIL PROTECTED] - diff -Nur linux-2.6.21-rc6-git3.orig/drivers/ata/ahci.c linux-2.6.21-rc6-git3/drivers/ata/ahci.c --- linux-2.6.21-rc6-git3

Re: [PATCH] ahci.c: remove non-existing SB600 raid id

2007-04-11 Thread Conke Hu
On 4/11/07, Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Conke Hu wrote: SB600 RAID and SB600 SATA is the same controller and share the same PCI ID 0x4380. There is such PCI ID 0x4381. I assume 'no' is missing in the last sentence. :-) -- tejun Oh, sorry :( so, should I re-send the mail? conke

[PATCH] ahci.c: remove non-existing SB600 raid id (re-send)

2007-04-11 Thread Conke Hu
SB600 RAID and SB600 SATA is the same controller and share the same PCI ID 0x4380. There is no such PCI ID 0x4381. Signed-off-by: Conke Hu [EMAIL PROTECTED] - diff -Nur linux-2.6.21-rc6-git3.orig/drivers/ata/ahci.c linux-2.6.21-rc6-git3/drivers/ata/ahci.c --- linux-2.6.21-rc6-git3

Use C++ in kernel module?

2007-03-29 Thread Conke Hu
Is it possible to use C++ in linux kernel module? how? I've tested but failed, there is an unknown symbol in the .o file from c++ source code. Conke - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at

Use C++ in kernel module?

2007-03-29 Thread Conke Hu
Is it possible to use C++ in linux kernel module? how? I've tested but failed, there is an unknown symbol in the .o file from c++ source code. Conke - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at

[PATCH] ahci.c: walkaround for SB600 SATA internal error issue

2007-03-27 Thread Conke Hu
:03:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:00/a0 Emask 0x40 (internal error) end cut - Signed-off-by: Conke Hu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- 2.6.21-rc5-git1/drivers/ata/ahci.c.orig 2007-04-07 22:36:51.0 +0800 +++ 2.6.21-rc5-git1/drivers/ata/ahci.c 2007-04-07 22:44:42.0

Re: [PATCH] ahci.c: fix ati sb600 sata IRQ_TF_ERR

2007-03-27 Thread Conke Hu
On 3/15/07, Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Conke Hu wrote: >> E Internal error: The host bus adapter experienced an internal error >> that caused the operation to fail and may have put the host bus adapter >> into an error state. Host software should reset th

Re: [PATCH] ahci.c: fix ati sb600 sata IRQ_TF_ERR

2007-03-27 Thread Conke Hu
On 3/15/07, Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Conke Hu wrote: E Internal error: The host bus adapter experienced an internal error that caused the operation to fail and may have put the host bus adapter into an error state. Host software should reset the interface before re-trying

[PATCH] ahci.c: walkaround for SB600 SATA internal error issue

2007-03-27 Thread Conke Hu
:03:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:00/a0 Emask 0x40 (internal error) end cut - Signed-off-by: Conke Hu [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- 2.6.21-rc5-git1/drivers/ata/ahci.c.orig 2007-04-07 22:36:51.0 +0800 +++ 2.6.21-rc5-git1/drivers/ata/ahci.c 2007-04-07 22:44:42.0 +0800

Re: [PATCH] ahci.c: fix ati sb600 sata IRQ_TF_ERR

2007-03-15 Thread Conke Hu
On 3/14/07, Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello, Conke Hu wrote: >When there is no media in SATA CD/DVD drive or media is not ready, > AHCI controller fails to execute the ATAPI commands TEST_UNIT_READY, > READ_CAPACITY or READ_TOC and reports PORT_IRQ_TF_ERR. But A

Re: [PATCH] ahci.c: fix ati sb600 sata IRQ_TF_ERR

2007-03-15 Thread Conke Hu
On 3/14/07, Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, Conke Hu wrote: When there is no media in SATA CD/DVD drive or media is not ready, AHCI controller fails to execute the ATAPI commands TEST_UNIT_READY, READ_CAPACITY or READ_TOC and reports PORT_IRQ_TF_ERR. But ATI SB600 SATA

[PATCH] ahci.c: fix ati sb600 sata IRQ_TF_ERR

2007-03-14 Thread Conke Hu
/a0 Emask 0x40 (internal error) end cut - Signed-off-by: Conke Hu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- linux-2.6.21-rc3-git8/drivers/ata/ahci.c.orig 2007-03-25 20:57:31.0 +0800 +++ linux-2.6.21-rc3-git8/drivers/ata/ahci.c2007-03-25 21:03:54.0 +0800 @@ -80,6

[PATCH] ahci.c: fix ati sb600 sata IRQ_TF_ERR

2007-03-14 Thread Conke Hu
/a0 Emask 0x40 (internal error) end cut - Signed-off-by: Conke Hu [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- linux-2.6.21-rc3-git8/drivers/ata/ahci.c.orig 2007-03-25 20:57:31.0 +0800 +++ linux-2.6.21-rc3-git8/drivers/ata/ahci.c2007-03-25 21:03:54.0 +0800 @@ -80,6 +80,7

Re: [BUG] ATAPI command TEST_UNIT_READY never succeeds!

2007-03-09 Thread Conke Hu
On 3/7/07, Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: (snip) I've read your last posting about this, but forgot to follow up. TUR is supposed to fail if ATAPI device doesn't have media loaded. TUR fails and sense data returns device not ready - media not present. That's the normal operation. Does

Re: [BUG] ATAPI command TEST_UNIT_READY never succeeds!

2007-03-09 Thread Conke Hu
On 3/7/07, Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (snip) I've read your last posting about this, but forgot to follow up. TUR is supposed to fail if ATAPI device doesn't have media loaded. TUR fails and sense data returns device not ready - media not present. That's the normal operation. Does

Re: [BUG] ATAPI command TEST_UNIT_READY never succeeds!

2007-03-07 Thread Conke Hu
On 3/7/07, Conke Hu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, Do you ever noticed that the ATAPI command TEST_UNIT_READY always fails to execute !? I debugged in the following environments: piix + Intel ICH6/ICH7 PATA atiixp + ATI SB600 PATA libata + ata_piix + Inte

[BUG] ATAPI command TEST_UNIT_READY never succeeds!

2007-03-07 Thread Conke Hu
Hi, Do you ever noticed that the ATAPI command TEST_UNIT_READY always fails to execute !? I debugged in the following environments: piix + Intel ICH6/ICH7 PATA atiixp + ATI SB600 PATA libata + ata_piix + Intel ICH6/ICH7 PATA libata + sata_sil24 + Silicon Image

[BUG] ATAPI command TEST_UNIT_READY never succeeds!

2007-03-07 Thread Conke Hu
Hi, Do you ever noticed that the ATAPI command TEST_UNIT_READY always fails to execute !? I debugged in the following environments: piix + Intel ICH6/ICH7 PATA atiixp + ATI SB600 PATA libata + ata_piix + Intel ICH6/ICH7 PATA libata + sata_sil24 + Silicon Image

Re: [BUG] ATAPI command TEST_UNIT_READY never succeeds!

2007-03-07 Thread Conke Hu
On 3/7/07, Conke Hu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Do you ever noticed that the ATAPI command TEST_UNIT_READY always fails to execute !? I debugged in the following environments: piix + Intel ICH6/ICH7 PATA atiixp + ATI SB600 PATA libata + ata_piix + Intel ICH6/ICH7

Re: [LIBATA BUG] sr.c: TEST_UNIT_READY error

2007-02-14 Thread Conke Hu
On 2/13/07, Conke Hu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 2/2/07, Conke Hu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 07:40 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > Conke Hu wrote: > > > Hi, > > >TEST_UNIT_READY in get_capabilities (drivers/scsi/sr.c line 743, o

Re: [LIBATA BUG] sr.c: TEST_UNIT_READY error

2007-02-14 Thread Conke Hu
On 2/13/07, Conke Hu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2/2/07, Conke Hu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 07:40 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: Conke Hu wrote: Hi, TEST_UNIT_READY in get_capabilities (drivers/scsi/sr.c line 743, or see below) always returns error

Re: [LIBATA BUG] sr.c: TEST_UNIT_READY error

2007-02-12 Thread Conke Hu
On 2/2/07, Conke Hu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 07:40 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Conke Hu wrote: > > Hi, > >TEST_UNIT_READY in get_capabilities (drivers/scsi/sr.c line 743, or > > see below) always returns error. > >

Re: [LIBATA BUG] sr.c: TEST_UNIT_READY error

2007-02-12 Thread Conke Hu
On 2/2/07, Conke Hu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 07:40 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: Conke Hu wrote: Hi, TEST_UNIT_READY in get_capabilities (drivers/scsi/sr.c line 743, or see below) always returns error. code begin

Re: [LIBATA BUG] sr.c: TEST_UNIT_READY error

2007-02-08 Thread Conke Hu
On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 07:40 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Conke Hu wrote: > > Hi, > >TEST_UNIT_READY in get_capabilities (drivers/scsi/sr.c line 743, or > > see below) always returns error. > > > > code begin

Re: [LIBATA BUG] sr.c: TEST_UNIT_READY error

2007-02-08 Thread Conke Hu
On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 07:40 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: Conke Hu wrote: Hi, TEST_UNIT_READY in get_capabilities (drivers/scsi/sr.c line 743, or see below) always returns error. code begin - retries = 0; do { memset

[LIBATA BUG] sr.c: TEST_UNIT_READY error

2007-02-07 Thread Conke Hu
Hi, TEST_UNIT_READY in get_capabilities (drivers/scsi/sr.c line 743, or see below) always returns error. code begin - retries = 0; do { memset((void *)cmd, 0, MAX_COMMAND_SIZE); cmd[0] = TEST_UNIT_READY; the_result

[LIBATA BUG] sr.c: TEST_UNIT_READY error

2007-02-07 Thread Conke Hu
Hi, TEST_UNIT_READY in get_capabilities (drivers/scsi/sr.c line 743, or see below) always returns error. code begin - retries = 0; do { memset((void *)cmd, 0, MAX_COMMAND_SIZE); cmd[0] = TEST_UNIT_READY; the_result

Re: [git patches] libata fixes

2007-02-06 Thread Conke Hu
On Fri, 2007-02-02 at 11:58 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Brian and Tejun's patches fix really ugly bugs, Alan's are of less > importance > > Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of > master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git > upstream-linus > > to receive the

Re: what does "busses" (drivers/i2c/busses) mean?

2007-02-06 Thread Conke Hu
On Mon, 2007-02-05 at 08:17 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On Mon, 5 Feb 2007 14:23:35 +0800 Conke Hu wrote: > > > what does the directory name drivers/i2c/busses mean? did it mean bus(es)? > > "busses" is an acceptable spelling of "buses" in some places, >

Re: what does busses (drivers/i2c/busses) mean?

2007-02-06 Thread Conke Hu
On Mon, 2007-02-05 at 08:17 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: On Mon, 5 Feb 2007 14:23:35 +0800 Conke Hu wrote: what does the directory name drivers/i2c/busses mean? did it mean bus(es)? busses is an acceptable spelling of buses in some places, so Yes, I believe that it means bus(es

Re: [git patches] libata fixes

2007-02-06 Thread Conke Hu
On Fri, 2007-02-02 at 11:58 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: Brian and Tejun's patches fix really ugly bugs, Alan's are of less importance Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git upstream-linus to receive the following

what does "busses" (drivers/i2c/busses) mean?

2007-02-04 Thread Conke Hu
what does the directory name drivers/i2c/busses mean? did it mean bus(es)? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at

what does busses (drivers/i2c/busses) mean?

2007-02-04 Thread Conke Hu
what does the directory name drivers/i2c/busses mean? did it mean bus(es)? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at

Re: [PATCH 3/3] atiixp.c: add cable detection support for ATI IDE

2007-01-09 Thread Conke Hu
On 1/10/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Here are the three patches. Conke, can you please tell us whether this is all correct and complete? From: "Conke Hu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> A previous patch to atiixp.c was removed but some code has not been cleaned. No

Re: [PATCH 3/3] atiixp.c: add cable detection support for ATI IDE

2007-01-09 Thread Conke Hu
On 1/7/07, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 1/6/07, Conke Hu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > IDE HDD does not work if it uses a 40-pin PATA cable on ATI chipset. > This patch fixes the bug. > > Signed-off-by: Conke Hu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Acked

Re: [PATCH 2/3] atiixp.c: sb600 ide only has one channel

2007-01-09 Thread Conke Hu
On 1/7/07, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 1/6/07, Conke Hu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > AMD/ATI SB600 IDE/PATA controller only has one channel. > > Signed-off-by: Conke Hu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Acked-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <[EMAI

Re: [PATCH 1/3] atiixp.c: remove unused code

2007-01-09 Thread Conke Hu
On 1/7/07, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 1/6/07, Conke Hu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A previous patch to atiixp.c was removed but some code has not been This one? http://kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git

Re: [PATCH] Add pci class code for SATA (patch updated)

2007-01-09 Thread Conke Hu
On 1/8/07, Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... The above seems OK to me... Jeff add pci class code for SATA & AHCI, and replace some magic numbers. Signed-off-by: Conke Hu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff -Nur linux-2.6.20-rc4.orig/drivers/ata/ahci.c

Re: [PATCH] Add pci class code for SATA (patch updated)

2007-01-09 Thread Conke Hu
On 1/8/07, Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... The above seems OK to me... Jeff add pci class code for SATA AHCI, and replace some magic numbers. Signed-off-by: Conke Hu [EMAIL PROTECTED] diff -Nur linux-2.6.20-rc4.orig/drivers/ata/ahci.c linux-2.6.20-rc4/drivers

Re: [PATCH 1/3] atiixp.c: remove unused code

2007-01-09 Thread Conke Hu
On 1/7/07, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 1/6/07, Conke Hu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A previous patch to atiixp.c was removed but some code has not been This one? http://kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h

Re: [PATCH 2/3] atiixp.c: sb600 ide only has one channel

2007-01-09 Thread Conke Hu
On 1/7/07, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 1/6/07, Conke Hu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: AMD/ATI SB600 IDE/PATA controller only has one channel. Signed-off-by: Conke Hu [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ but the patch is line wrapped

Re: [PATCH 3/3] atiixp.c: add cable detection support for ATI IDE

2007-01-09 Thread Conke Hu
On 1/7/07, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 1/6/07, Conke Hu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: IDE HDD does not work if it uses a 40-pin PATA cable on ATI chipset. This patch fixes the bug. Signed-off-by: Conke Hu [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [EMAIL

Re: [PATCH 3/3] atiixp.c: add cable detection support for ATI IDE

2007-01-09 Thread Conke Hu
On 1/10/07, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip Here are the three patches. Conke, can you please tell us whether this is all correct and complete? From: Conke Hu [EMAIL PROTECTED] A previous patch to atiixp.c was removed but some code has not been cleaned. Now we remove these code

[PATCH 3/3] atiixp.c: add cable detection support for ATI IDE

2007-01-06 Thread Conke Hu
IDE HDD does not work if it uses a 40-pin PATA cable on ATI chipset. This patch fixes the bug. Signed-off-by: Conke Hu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- --- linux-2.6.20-rc3-git4/drivers/ide/pci/atiixp.c.22007-01-06 19:19:35.0 +0800 +++ linux-2.6.20-rc3-git4/drivers/i

[PATCH 2/3] atiixp.c: sb600 ide only has one channel

2007-01-06 Thread Conke Hu
AMD/ATI SB600 IDE/PATA controller only has one channel. Signed-off-by: Conke Hu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- --- linux-2.6.20-rc3-git4/drivers/ide/pci/atiixp.c.12007-01-06 19:13:55.0 +0800 +++ linux-2.6.20-rc3-git4/drivers/ide/pci/atiixp.c.22007-01-06 19:19:35.000

[PATCH 1/3] atiixp.c: remove unused code

2007-01-06 Thread Conke Hu
A previous patch to atiixp.c was removed but some code has not been cleaned. Now we remove these code sine they are no use any longer. Signed-off-by: Conke Hu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - --- linux-2.6.20-rc3-git4/drivers/ide/pci/atiixp.c.orig 2007-01-06 18:45:28.0

[PATCH 1/3] atiixp.c: remove unused code

2007-01-06 Thread Conke Hu
A previous patch to atiixp.c was removed but some code has not been cleaned. Now we remove these code sine they are no use any longer. Signed-off-by: Conke Hu [EMAIL PROTECTED] - --- linux-2.6.20-rc3-git4/drivers/ide/pci/atiixp.c.orig 2007-01-06 18:45:28.0 +0800 +++ linux

[PATCH 2/3] atiixp.c: sb600 ide only has one channel

2007-01-06 Thread Conke Hu
AMD/ATI SB600 IDE/PATA controller only has one channel. Signed-off-by: Conke Hu [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- --- linux-2.6.20-rc3-git4/drivers/ide/pci/atiixp.c.12007-01-06 19:13:55.0 +0800 +++ linux-2.6.20-rc3-git4/drivers/ide/pci/atiixp.c.22007-01-06 19:19:35.0

[PATCH 3/3] atiixp.c: add cable detection support for ATI IDE

2007-01-06 Thread Conke Hu
IDE HDD does not work if it uses a 40-pin PATA cable on ATI chipset. This patch fixes the bug. Signed-off-by: Conke Hu [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- --- linux-2.6.20-rc3-git4/drivers/ide/pci/atiixp.c.22007-01-06 19:19:35.0 +0800 +++ linux-2.6.20-rc3-git4/drivers/ide/pci

Re: [PATCH] Add pci class code for SATA

2006-12-19 Thread Conke Hu
On 12/20/06, Conke Hu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 12/20/06, Conke Hu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 12/20/06, Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Conke Hu wrote: > > > Add pci class code 0x0106 for SATA to pci_ids.h > &g

Re: [PATCH] Add pci class code for SATA

2006-12-19 Thread Conke Hu
On 12/20/06, Conke Hu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 12/20/06, Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Conke Hu wrote: > > Add pci class code 0x0106 for SATA to pci_ids.h > > > > signed-off-by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > ---

Re: [PATCH] Add pci class code for SATA

2006-12-19 Thread Conke Hu
On 12/20/06, Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Conke Hu wrote: > Add pci class code 0x0106 for SATA to pci_ids.h > > signed-off-by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --- linux-2.6.20-rc1/include/linux/pci_ids.h.orig 2006-12-20 > 01:58:30.0 +080

[PATCH] Add pci class code for SATA

2006-12-19 Thread Conke Hu
Add pci class code 0x0106 for SATA to pci_ids.h signed-off-by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- linux-2.6.20-rc1/include/linux/pci_ids.h.orig 2006-12-20 01:58:30.0 +0800 +++ linux-2.6.20-rc1/include/linux/pci_ids.h2006-12-20 01:59:07.0 +0800 @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@

[PATCH] Add pci class code for SATA

2006-12-19 Thread Conke Hu
Add pci class code 0x0106 for SATA to pci_ids.h signed-off-by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- linux-2.6.20-rc1/include/linux/pci_ids.h.orig 2006-12-20 01:58:30.0 +0800 +++ linux-2.6.20-rc1/include/linux/pci_ids.h2006-12-20 01:59:07.0 +0800 @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@

Re: [PATCH] Add pci class code for SATA

2006-12-19 Thread Conke Hu
On 12/20/06, Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Conke Hu wrote: Add pci class code 0x0106 for SATA to pci_ids.h signed-off-by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- linux-2.6.20-rc1/include/linux/pci_ids.h.orig 2006-12-20 01:58:30.0 +0800 +++ linux-2.6.20-rc1/include

Re: [PATCH] Add pci class code for SATA

2006-12-19 Thread Conke Hu
On 12/20/06, Conke Hu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 12/20/06, Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Conke Hu wrote: Add pci class code 0x0106 for SATA to pci_ids.h signed-off-by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- linux-2.6.20-rc1/include/linux/pci_ids.h.orig 2006-12-20 01

Re: [PATCH] Add pci class code for SATA

2006-12-19 Thread Conke Hu
On 12/20/06, Conke Hu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 12/20/06, Conke Hu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 12/20/06, Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Conke Hu wrote: Add pci class code 0x0106 for SATA to pci_ids.h signed-off-by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- linux-2.6.20

Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.20

2006-12-06 Thread Conke Hu
On Mon, 2006-12-04 at 21:41 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 04 Dec 2006 23:56:42 -0500 > Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Andrew Morton wrote: > > > via-pata-controller-xfer-fixes.patch > > > via-pata-controller-xfer-fixes-fix.patch > > > > Tejun's

Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.20

2006-12-06 Thread Conke Hu
On Mon, 2006-12-04 at 21:41 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: On Mon, 04 Dec 2006 23:56:42 -0500 Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andrew Morton wrote: via-pata-controller-xfer-fixes.patch via-pata-controller-xfer-fixes-fix.patch Tejun's 3d3cca37559e3ab2b574eda11ed5207ccdb8980a has