Re: Statement by SFLC (was Re: Wasting our Freedom)

2007-09-16 Thread Constantine A. Murenin
On 16/09/2007, Marc Espie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Sep 16, 2007 at 09:17:41AM -0400, Eben Moglen wrote: > > We will make no more public statements until the work is complete, and > > we will be neither hurried nor intimidated by people who shout at us > > instead of helping. > > http://

Re: That whole "Linux stealing our code" thing

2007-09-01 Thread Constantine A. Murenin
On 01/09/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 02 Sep 2007 03:55:37 +0200, Adrian Bunk said: > > > Jiri's patch would have wrongly not only removed the BSD statement from > > dual licenced files but also from not dual licenced files. > > > > This was a mistake in this patch (th

Re: Fwd: That whole "Linux stealing our code" thing

2007-09-01 Thread Constantine A. Murenin
On 01/09/07, Theo de Raadt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > When companies have taken our wireless device drivers, many many of > them have given changes and fixes back. Some maybe didn't, but that > is OK. > > When Linux took our changes back, they immediately locked the door > against changes moving

Re: That whole "Linux stealing our code" thing

2007-09-01 Thread Constantine A. Murenin
On 01/09/07, Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jason Dixon wrote: > > Once the grantor (Reyk) releases his code under that license, it must > > remain. You are free to derive work and redistribute under your > > license, but the original copyright and license permission remains > > intact.

Re: Fwd: That whole "Linux stealing our code" thing

2007-09-01 Thread Constantine A. Murenin
On 01/09/07, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 07:29:39PM -0400, Constantine A. Murenin wrote: > > On 01/09/07, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 05:27:03PM -0400, Constantine A. Murenin wrote: &g

Re: Fwd: That whole "Linux stealing our code" thing

2007-09-01 Thread Constantine A. Murenin
On 01/09/07, Luis R. Rodriguez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I urge developers to not bait into this and just leave this alone. > Those involved know what they are doing and have a strong team of > attorneys watching their backs. Any *necessary* discussions are be > done privately. Err... I don't

Re: Fwd: That whole "Linux stealing our code" thing

2007-09-01 Thread Constantine A. Murenin
On 01/09/07, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 05:27:03PM -0400, Constantine A. Murenin wrote: > > On 01/09/07, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 01:37:18PM -0400, Constantine A. Murenin wrote: &g

Re: Fwd: That whole "Linux stealing our code" thing

2007-09-01 Thread Constantine A. Murenin
On 01/09/07, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 10:54:57PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 01:37:18PM -0400, Constantine A. Murenin wrote: > > > On 01/09/07, Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > &

Re: Fwd: That whole "Linux stealing our code" thing

2007-09-01 Thread Constantine A. Murenin
On 01/09/07, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 01:37:18PM -0400, Constantine A. Murenin wrote: > > On 01/09/07, Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Constantine A. Murenin wrote: > > > > This will hopefully

Re: Fwd: That whole "Linux stealing our code" thing

2007-09-01 Thread Constantine A. Murenin
On 01/09/07, Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Constantine A. Murenin wrote: > > This will hopefully help diminish certain myths about the code licensing. > > What myth? The myth that Theo understands dual licensing? Reyk's code was never dual licensed, so it

Fwd: That whole "Linux stealing our code" thing

2007-09-01 Thread Constantine A. Murenin
This will hopefully help diminish certain myths about the code licensing. C. -- Forwarded message -- From: Theo de Raadt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 31-Aug-2007 21:40 Subject: That whole "Linux stealing our code" thing To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [bcc'd to Eben Moglen so that people don