Fw: Modules and DevFS

2001-02-01 Thread Dan Egli
I just edited my rc.local file to add symlinks of the old names to the files of the new names. Works great for my purposes. -- Dan Egli - Original Message - From: "Michael B. Trausch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "William Knop" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <

Fw: Modules and DevFS

2001-02-01 Thread Dan Egli
I just edited my rc.local file to add symlinks of the old names to the files of the new names. Works great for my purposes. -- Dan Egli - Original Message - From: "Michael B. Trausch" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "William Knop" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: W

Re: Bug in ppp_async.c

2001-01-24 Thread Dan Egli
I do ppp using 2.4.0 w/ redhat 7 now, no upgrades besides modultils and the kernel :> -- Dan Egli -- Network Administrator / President -- Frankenstein Computers -- 801-671-7875 - Original Message - From: "Paul Mackerras" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Albert D. Cahalan

Re: Bug in ppp_async.c

2001-01-24 Thread Dan Egli
I do ppp using 2.4.0 w/ redhat 7 now, no upgrades besides modultils and the kernel : -- Dan Egli -- Network Administrator / President -- Frankenstein Computers -- 801-671-7875 - Original Message - From: "Paul Mackerras" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "Albert D. Cahalan"

ide-scsi not working in 2.4.0. Possible scsi subsystem problems?

2001-01-15 Thread Dan Egli
Ok. Here's a question for anyone. I have a computer here that I'm trying to get IDE-SCSI to work on. It seems to be a complete dud from this point of view. System config: Dual P3-550, 256MB Ram Scsi card: Adaptec 2940U2W. 2 Seagate LVD drives connected Primary

ide-scsi not working in 2.4.0. Possible scsi subsystem problems?

2001-01-15 Thread Dan Egli
Ok. Here's a question for anyone. I have a computer here that I'm trying to get IDE-SCSI to work on. It seems to be a complete dud from this point of view. System config: Dual P3-550, 256MB Ram Scsi card: Adaptec 2940U2W. 2 Seagate LVD drives connected Primary

Re: Signal 11

2000-12-15 Thread Dan Egli
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote: > Yes. > > And I realize that somebody inside RedHat really wanted to use a snapshot > in order to get some C++ code to compile right. > > But it at the same time threw C stability out the window, by using a > not-very-widely-tested snapshot for a

Re: ASUS CUR-DLS LSI SYM53C896 SCSI driver

2000-12-08 Thread Dan Egli
easiest way I can think of is to compile them into the kernel, not as modules. Thus as soon as the kernel boots, they are active in memory. -- Dan Egli -- Network Administrator / President -- Frankenstein Computers -- 801-671-7875 - Original Message - From: "Edouard Soriano&quo

Re: ASUS CUR-DLS LSI SYM53C896 SCSI driver

2000-12-08 Thread Dan Egli
easiest way I can think of is to compile them into the kernel, not as modules. Thus as soon as the kernel boots, they are active in memory. -- Dan Egli -- Network Administrator / President -- Frankenstein Computers -- 801-671-7875 - Original Message - From: "Edouard Soriano&qu