mes and all the results were
all around 90 MB/s. I have no idea what caused those results to be so
far below the norm.
If I discover what the cause was I'll let you know but otherwise I'm
sorry about the noise!
Dan
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 6:38 PM, Dan MacDonald wrote:
> Hi Gary
>
&
more.
Thanks
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 5:48 PM, Gary Bisson
wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 05:02:40PM +, Dan MacDonald wrote:
>> Thankfully there is an archive of older Arch ARM packages which should
>> reduce the amount amount of bisection / compiling I may
, Dan MacDonald wrote:
> This is one of the cross-compilation guides I tried and failed to get to work.
>
> https://archlinuxarm.org/wiki/Distcc_Cross-Compiling
>
> It's been a year or two since I last tried to get distcc working. I
> followed all those instructions but p
t remember what other guides I tried but that one was
the most directly relevant and most likely to work as I use Arch on
all my machines, x86 and ARM.
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 3:18 PM, Dan MacDonald wrote:
> Hi Fabio
>
> I've never used bisect before and I have thusfar failed to get AR
4.9.8 to understand
> where this performance regression come from?
>
> ____
> From: Dan MacDonald
> Sent: Tuesday, February 7, 2017 12:31:10 PM
> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Gary Bisson; Fabio Estevam; shawn...@kernel.org; t...@kernel.org
&
(Fake) Reply to CC in relevant people.
Hi LKML
I recently got a SABRE Lite, iMX.6q based SBC. I bought this board
over the RPi3, for example, because I wanted SATA and open source
graphics drivers via etnaviv / armada.
Under Arch Linux ARM with Linux 4.9.0, hdparm said I was getting an
average of ~120 MB/s buffered disk read speed. Af
7 matches
Mail list logo
