On Sat, 30 Jun 2001, Rudolf Polzer wrote:
> There is a problem concerning chvt. A normal user can run a
>
> bash$ while [ 1 ]; do chvt 11; done
>
> which cannot be killed using the console (only remotely, virtually never
> on a nonnetworked multiuser machine). So I changed the kernel source code
On Sat, 30 Jun 2001, Rudolf Polzer wrote:
There is a problem concerning chvt. A normal user can run a
bash$ while [ 1 ]; do chvt 11; done
which cannot be killed using the console (only remotely, virtually never
on a nonnetworked multiuser machine). So I changed the kernel source code
so
On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, Brent D. Norris wrote:
> Recently one more than one subject there have been comments along the
> lines of, "Do x, y and z because it would be great on desktops" and then
> someone else will say "NO! becausing doing x, y, and z will make servers
> run slow." Then as a final
On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, Brent D. Norris wrote:
Recently one more than one subject there have been comments along the
lines of, Do x, y and z because it would be great on desktops and then
someone else will say NO! becausing doing x, y, and z will make servers
run slow. Then as a final note
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, f5ibh wrote:
> make[4]: Entre dans le répertoire
> `/usr/src/kernel-sources-2.4.5-ac20/drivers/pnp'
> gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/kernel-sources-2.4.5-ac20/include -Wall
> -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer
> -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -pipe
Ok, my two cents.
Print all copyright, config, etc. as KERN_DEBUG. Then use a 'verbose' or
similar parameter to lilo/kernel to enable console printing of KERN_DEBUG,
to be used when the system fails to boot, etc.
Dan.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel"
Ok, my two cents.
Print all copyright, config, etc. as KERN_DEBUG. Then use a 'verbose' or
similar parameter to lilo/kernel to enable console printing of KERN_DEBUG,
to be used when the system fails to boot, etc.
Dan.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, f5ibh wrote:
make[4]: Entre dans le répertoire
`/usr/src/kernel-sources-2.4.5-ac20/drivers/pnp'
gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/kernel-sources-2.4.5-ac20/include -Wall
-Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer
-fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -pipe
export IFS=$'\n'
> lines=`ls -l | awk '{print "\""$0"\""}'`
> for i in $lines
> do
> echo line:$i
> done
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
export IFS=$'\n'
lines=`ls -l | awk '{print \$0\}'`
for i in $lines
do
echo line:$i
done
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read
On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 05:13:43PM -0400, Albert D. Cahalan wrote:
> > Is there any logical reason why if, given fd is a connected, AF_INET,
> > SOCK_STREAM socket, and one does a write(fd, buffer, len); close(fd);
> > to the peer, over a rather slow network (read modem, satelite link, etc),
> >
On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 08:17:27PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > 2. There is a flaw in the TCP protocol itself that is extremely unlikely
> > to bite people but can in theory cause wrong data in some unusual
> > circumstances that Ian Heavans found and has yet to be fixed by
> >
> Yes, I know there's no hard and fast rule for the exact ammount of ram/swap one
> needs that will always work. However, in 2.2 for a 'workstation' one could
> usually quite happily get away with having 128:128 and never have much of a
> problem. with 2.4.0 and up this isn't the case. This
On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 10:48:36AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> 'lo all. I've got a question about swap and RAM requirements in 2.4. Now,
> when 2.4.0 was kicked out, the fact that you need swap=2xRAM was mentioned.
> But what I'm wondering is what exactly are the limits on this. Right now
> I've
On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 10:48:36AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
'lo all. I've got a question about swap and RAM requirements in 2.4. Now,
when 2.4.0 was kicked out, the fact that you need swap=2xRAM was mentioned.
But what I'm wondering is what exactly are the limits on this. Right now
I've got
Yes, I know there's no hard and fast rule for the exact ammount of ram/swap one
needs that will always work. However, in 2.2 for a 'workstation' one could
usually quite happily get away with having 128:128 and never have much of a
problem. with 2.4.0 and up this isn't the case. This has
On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 08:17:27PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
2. There is a flaw in the TCP protocol itself that is extremely unlikely
to bite people but can in theory cause wrong data in some unusual
circumstances that Ian Heavans found and has yet to be fixed by
the
On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 05:13:43PM -0400, Albert D. Cahalan wrote:
Is there any logical reason why if, given fd is a connected, AF_INET,
SOCK_STREAM socket, and one does a write(fd, buffer, len); close(fd);
to the peer, over a rather slow network (read modem, satelite link, etc),
the data
On Wed, 9 May 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
...
> 2.4.4-ac6
...
To be sincere I was expecting the Athlone pre-pre-pre-patch/fix to be
included.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
On Wed, 9 May 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
...
2.4.4-ac6
...
To be sincere I was expecting the Athlone pre-pre-pre-patch/fix to be
included.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
> No matter if I use the mandrake 8 gcc 2.96 or a self compiled gcc 2.95.3.
Mandrake 8's kernel comes with i586 CPU support, it is alredy known it
works. Remember that the instability occurs only when Athlon optimizations
are used.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
No matter if I use the mandrake 8 gcc 2.96 or a self compiled gcc 2.95.3.
Mandrake 8's kernel comes with i586 CPU support, it is alredy known it
works. Remember that the instability occurs only when Athlon optimizations
are used.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
On Fri, 20 Apr 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> So how risky is this?
Risky enough. I had to chkdsk once for half an hour after copying on an
NTFS 5. Of course, I'm not familiar with the internals of it.
>
> Also, I'll have to recreate my Linux partitions after the upgrade. Does anyone
>
On Fri, 20 Apr 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So how risky is this?
Risky enough. I had to chkdsk once for half an hour after copying on an
NTFS 5. Of course, I'm not familiar with the internals of it.
Also, I'll have to recreate my Linux partitions after the upgrade. Does anyone
know if
On 13 Apr 2001, Doug McNaught wrote:
> Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > Here might be one of the resons for the trouble with VIA chipsets:
> > >
> > > http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/3/18267.html
> > >
> > > Some DMA error corrupting data, sounds like a really nasty bug. The
> >
On 13 Apr 2001, Doug McNaught wrote:
Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Here might be one of the resons for the trouble with VIA chipsets:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/3/18267.html
Some DMA error corrupting data, sounds like a really nasty bug. The
information is
*/
net_notifier_init();
+#endif
/* Mount the root filesystem.. */
mount_root();
After this, everything seems and runs okay.
Be seeing you around.
--
Dan Podeanu,
Extreme Solutions Inc., Bucharest, Romania.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel&qu
Mount the root filesystem.. */
mount_root();
After this, everything seems and runs okay.
Be seeing you around.
--
Dan Podeanu,
Extreme Solutions Inc., Bucharest, Romania.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
On Mon, 18 Sep 2000, Christopher Allen Wing wrote:
.. snipped ..
> tar should work okay, I think; by default it uses textual user names
> instead of numeric UIDs.
Not true. All the kernels I download from a certain local mirror are owned
by the local user 'tarabas' since the uid happens to
On Mon, 18 Sep 2000, Christopher Allen Wing wrote:
.. snipped ..
tar should work okay, I think; by default it uses textual user names
instead of numeric UIDs.
Not true. All the kernels I download from a certain local mirror are owned
by the local user 'tarabas' since the uid happens to be
30 matches
Mail list logo
