Re: [PATCH 4.4 038/134] ARM: DRA7: hwmod_data: Prevent wait_target_disable error for usb_otg_ss

On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 07:08:36AM +0200, Tero Kristo wrote: > On 20/03/18 01:52, Dan Rue wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 07:05:21PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > 4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please

Re: [PATCH 4.4 038/134] ARM: DRA7: hwmod_data: Prevent wait_target_disable error for usb_otg_ss

On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 07:08:36AM +0200, Tero Kristo wrote: > On 20/03/18 01:52, Dan Rue wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 07:05:21PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > 4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please

Re: [PATCH 4.9 000/241] 4.9.89-stable review

On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 07:04:25PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.89 release. > There are 241 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me

Re: [PATCH 4.9 000/241] 4.9.89-stable review

On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 07:04:25PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.89 release. > There are 241 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me

Re: [PATCH 4.4 038/134] ARM: DRA7: hwmod_data: Prevent wait_target_disable error for usb_otg_ss

On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 07:05:21PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > 4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > > -- > > From: Roger Quadros > > > [ Upstream commit e2d54fe76997301b49311bde7ba8ef52b47896f9 ] > > It seems that

Re: [PATCH 4.4 038/134] ARM: DRA7: hwmod_data: Prevent wait_target_disable error for usb_otg_ss

On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 07:05:21PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > 4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > > -- > > From: Roger Quadros > > > [ Upstream commit e2d54fe76997301b49311bde7ba8ef52b47896f9 ] > > It seems that if L3_INIT

Re: [PATCH 4.4 000/134] 4.4.123-stable review

On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 07:04:43PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.123 release. > There are 134 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me

Re: [PATCH 4.4 000/134] 4.4.123-stable review

On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 07:04:43PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.123 release. > There are 134 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me

Re: [PATCH 4.15 000/128] 4.15.11-stable review

On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 12:15:23PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 11:25:26AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 04:22:21PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.15.11 release. > > > There

Re: [PATCH 4.15 000/128] 4.15.11-stable review

On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 12:15:23PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 11:25:26AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 04:22:21PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.15.11 release. > > > There

Re: [PATCH 4.14 000/109] 4.14.28-stable review

On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 12:14:42PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 11:24:54AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 04:22:29PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.28 release. > > > There

Re: [PATCH 4.14 000/109] 4.14.28-stable review

On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 12:14:42PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 11:24:54AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 04:22:29PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.28 release. > > > There

Re: [PATCH 4.14 056/109] clk: ti: clkctrl: add support for retrying failed init

On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 04:23:25PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > 4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > > -- > > From: Tero Kristo > > > [ Upstream commit 729e13bf58e643b9accd2a14c55b555958702fb0 ] > > In case the

Re: [PATCH 4.14 056/109] clk: ti: clkctrl: add support for retrying failed init

On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 04:23:25PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > 4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > > -- > > From: Tero Kristo > > > [ Upstream commit 729e13bf58e643b9accd2a14c55b555958702fb0 ] > > In case the clkctrl node

Re: [PATCH 4.15 000/128] 4.15.11-stable review

On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 12:15:23PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 11:25:26AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 04:22:21PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.15.11 release. > > > There

Re: [PATCH 4.15 000/128] 4.15.11-stable review

On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 12:15:23PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 11:25:26AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 04:22:21PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.15.11 release. > > > There

Re: [PATCH 4.14 064/109] dmaengine: bcm2835-dma: Use vchan_terminate_vdesc() instead of desc_free

On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 04:23:33PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > 4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > > -- > > From: Peter Ujfalusi > > > [ Upstream commit de92436ac40ffe9933230aa503e24dbb5ede9201 ] > > To

Re: [PATCH 4.14 064/109] dmaengine: bcm2835-dma: Use vchan_terminate_vdesc() instead of desc_free

On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 04:23:33PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > 4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > > -- > > From: Peter Ujfalusi > > > [ Upstream commit de92436ac40ffe9933230aa503e24dbb5ede9201 ] > > To avoid race with

Re: [PATCH 4.15 049/146] mm/page_alloc: fix memmap_init_zone pageblock alignment

On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 04:23:36PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > 4.15-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. On 4.14 and 4.15, this patch breaks booting on dragonboard 410c and hikey 620 (both arm64). The fix has been proposed and tested but is not yet in

Re: [PATCH 4.15 049/146] mm/page_alloc: fix memmap_init_zone pageblock alignment

On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 04:23:36PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > 4.15-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. On 4.14 and 4.15, this patch breaks booting on dragonboard 410c and hikey 620 (both arm64). The fix has been proposed and tested but is not yet in

Re: selftests/x86/fsgsbase_64 test problem

On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 10:30:05AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 01/29/18 10:26, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > >>> > >>> That will utterly suck on non-UMIP machines that have > >>> hypervisor-provided UMIP emulation. > >> > >> Is that a valid thing to optimize for, especially given that paranoid >

Re: selftests/x86/fsgsbase_64 test problem

On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 10:30:05AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 01/29/18 10:26, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > >>> > >>> That will utterly suck on non-UMIP machines that have > >>> hypervisor-provided UMIP emulation. > >> > >> Is that a valid thing to optimize for, especially given that paranoid >

Re: [PATCH 4.15 00/45] 4.15.6-stable review

On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 07:28:39PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.15.6 release. > There are 45 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me

Re: [PATCH 4.15 00/45] 4.15.6-stable review

On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 07:28:39PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.15.6 release. > There are 45 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me

Re: [PATCH 4.9 000/145] 4.9.84-stable review

On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 07:25:06PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.84 release. > There are 145 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me

Re: [PATCH 4.9 000/145] 4.9.84-stable review

On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 07:25:06PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.84 release. > There are 145 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me

Re: [PATCH 4.14 000/159] 4.14.22-stable review

On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 07:25:08PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.22 release. > There are 159 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me

Re: [PATCH 4.14 000/159] 4.14.22-stable review

On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 07:25:08PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.22 release. > There are 159 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me

Re: [PATCH 4.4 000/193] 4.4.118-stable review

On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 07:23:53PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.118 release. > There are 193 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me

Re: [PATCH 4.4 000/193] 4.4.118-stable review

On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 07:23:53PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.118 release. > There are 193 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me

Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/77] 4.9.83-stable review

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 01:48:09PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.83 release. > There are 77 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me

Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/77] 4.9.83-stable review

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 01:48:09PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.83 release. > There are 77 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me

Re: [PATCH 4.15 000/163] 4.15.5-stable review

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 01:47:09PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.15.5 release. > There are 163 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me

Re: [PATCH 4.15 000/163] 4.15.5-stable review

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 01:47:09PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.15.5 release. > There are 163 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me

Re: [PATCH 5/6] mm, hugetlb: further simplify hugetlb allocation API

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 07:52:52PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Wed 21-02-18 10:19:14, Dan Rue wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 11:01:07AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > On Wed 21-02-18 10:55:26, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > > On Tue 20-02-18 22:24:57, Dan Rue

Re: [PATCH 5/6] mm, hugetlb: further simplify hugetlb allocation API

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 07:52:52PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Wed 21-02-18 10:19:14, Dan Rue wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 11:01:07AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > On Wed 21-02-18 10:55:26, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > > On Tue 20-02-18 22:24:57, Dan Rue

Re: [PATCH 5/6] mm, hugetlb: further simplify hugetlb allocation API

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 11:01:07AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Wed 21-02-18 10:55:26, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Tue 20-02-18 22:24:57, Dan Rue wrote: > [...] > > > I bisected the failure to this commit. The problem is seen on multiple > > > architec

Re: [PATCH 5/6] mm, hugetlb: further simplify hugetlb allocation API

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 11:01:07AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Wed 21-02-18 10:55:26, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Tue 20-02-18 22:24:57, Dan Rue wrote: > [...] > > > I bisected the failure to this commit. The problem is seen on multiple > > > architec

Re: [PATCH 5/6] mm, hugetlb: further simplify hugetlb allocation API

On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 10:32:12AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > From: Michal Hocko > > Hugetlb allocator has several layer of allocation functions depending > and the purpose of the allocation. There are two allocators depending > on whether the page can be allocated from the

Re: [PATCH 5/6] mm, hugetlb: further simplify hugetlb allocation API

On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 10:32:12AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > From: Michal Hocko > > Hugetlb allocator has several layer of allocation functions depending > and the purpose of the allocation. There are two allocators depending > on whether the page can be allocated from the page allocator or

Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/92] 4.9.81-stable review

On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 02:38:29PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.81 release. > There are 92 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me

Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/92] 4.9.81-stable review

On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 02:38:29PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.81 release. > There are 92 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me

Re: [PATCH 4.14 00/22] 4.14.19-stable review

On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 02:39:49PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.19 release. > There are 22 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me

Re: [PATCH 4.14 00/22] 4.14.19-stable review

On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 02:39:49PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.19 release. > There are 22 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me

Re: [kselftests] compaction_test is blocked

On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 03:53:59PM +0800, Li Zhijian wrote: > Hi > > kselftests is integrated Intel 0Day project. > Sometimes we found compaction_test is blocked for more than 1 hours until i > kill it. > > Try to figure out where it is running, i added some log to this case. > > the test log

Re: [kselftests] compaction_test is blocked

On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 03:53:59PM +0800, Li Zhijian wrote: > Hi > > kselftests is integrated Intel 0Day project. > Sometimes we found compaction_test is blocked for more than 1 hours until i > kill it. > > Try to figure out where it is running, i added some log to this case. > > the test log

Re: [PATCH 4.15 00/23] 4.15.3-stable review

On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 02:39:58PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.15.3 release. > There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me

Re: [PATCH 4.15 00/23] 4.15.3-stable review

On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 02:39:58PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.15.3 release. > There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me

Re: [PATCH 4.15 00/60] 4.15.2-stable review

On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 10:22:33AM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.15.2 release. > There are 60 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me

Re: [PATCH 4.15 00/60] 4.15.2-stable review

On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 10:22:33AM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.15.2 release. > There are 60 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me

Re: [PATCH 4.14 00/64] 4.14.18-stable review

On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 10:22:19AM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.18 release. > There are 64 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me

Re: [PATCH 4.14 00/64] 4.14.18-stable review

On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 10:22:19AM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.18 release. > There are 64 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me

Re: [PATCH 4.15 00/55] 4.15.1-stable review

On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 05:58:18PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.15.1 release. > There are 55 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me

Re: [PATCH 4.15 00/55] 4.15.1-stable review

On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 05:58:18PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.15.1 release. > There are 55 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me

Re: [PATCH 4.14 000/156] 4.14.17-stable review

On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 05:56:21PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.17 release. > There are 156 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me

Re: [PATCH 4.14 000/156] 4.14.17-stable review

On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 05:56:21PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.17 release. > There are 156 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me

Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/86] 4.9.80-stable review

On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 05:57:20PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.80 release. > There are 86 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me

Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/86] 4.9.80-stable review

On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 05:57:20PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.80 release. > There are 86 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me

Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/67] 4.4.115-stable review

On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 05:57:29PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.115 release. > There are 67 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me

Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/67] 4.4.115-stable review

On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 05:57:29PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.115 release. > There are 67 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me

selftests/x86/fsgsbase_64 test problem

We've noticed that fsgsbase_64 can fail intermittently with the following error: [RUN] ARCH_SET_GS(0x0) and clear gs, then schedule to 0x1 Before schedule, set selector to 0x1 other thread: ARCH_SET_GS(0x1) -- sel is 0x0 [FAIL] GS/BASE changed

selftests/x86/fsgsbase_64 test problem

We've noticed that fsgsbase_64 can fail intermittently with the following error: [RUN] ARCH_SET_GS(0x0) and clear gs, then schedule to 0x1 Before schedule, set selector to 0x1 other thread: ARCH_SET_GS(0x1) -- sel is 0x0 [FAIL] GS/BASE changed

Re: [PATCH 4.14 000/118] 4.14.14-stable review

On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 01:33:47PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.14 release. > There are 118 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me

Re: [PATCH 4.14 000/118] 4.14.14-stable review

On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 01:33:47PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.14 release. > There are 118 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me

Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/96] 4.9.77-stable review

On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 01:33:59PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.77 release. > There are 96 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me

Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/96] 4.9.77-stable review

On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 01:33:59PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.77 release. > There are 96 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me

Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/87] 4.4.112-stable review

On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 01:33:59PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.112 release. > There are 87 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me

Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/87] 4.4.112-stable review

On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 01:33:59PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.112 release. > There are 87 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me

Re: [PATCH 4.14 00/14] 4.14.12-stable review

On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 01:09:17PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.12 release. > There are 14 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me

Re: [PATCH 4.14 00/14] 4.14.12-stable review

On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 01:09:17PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.12 release. > There are 14 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me

Re: [PATCH 4.9 000/104] 4.9.72-stable review

On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 05:02:54PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 09:45:26AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.72 release. > > There are 104 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this

Re: [PATCH 4.9 000/104] 4.9.72-stable review

On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 05:02:54PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 09:45:26AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.72 release. > > There are 104 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this

Re: [PATCH 4.14 000/159] 4.14.9-stable review

On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 09:44:45AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.9 release. > There are 159 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me

Re: [PATCH 4.14 000/159] 4.14.9-stable review

On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 09:44:45AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.9 release. > There are 159 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me

Re: [PATCH 4.14 023/159] mm/sparsemem: Allocate mem_section at runtime for CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_EXTREME=y

On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 09:45:08AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > 4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > > -- > > From: Kirill A. Shutemov > > commit 83e3c48729d9ebb7af5a31a504f3fd6aff0348c4 upstream.

Re: [PATCH 4.14 023/159] mm/sparsemem: Allocate mem_section at runtime for CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_EXTREME=y

On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 09:45:08AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > 4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > > -- > > From: Kirill A. Shutemov > > commit 83e3c48729d9ebb7af5a31a504f3fd6aff0348c4 upstream. > > Size of the mem_section[]

Re: [PATCH 4.14 000/164] 4.14.6-stable review

On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 10:13:47AM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote: > Hi Naresh, > > >> Results from Linaro’s test farm. > >> No regressions on arm64 and x86_64. > >> armv7 beagleboard x15 results are not available due to infrastructure > >> issues. > >> > >> Note: > >> Newly added

Re: [PATCH 4.14 000/164] 4.14.6-stable review

On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 10:13:47AM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote: > Hi Naresh, > > >> Results from Linaro’s test farm. > >> No regressions on arm64 and x86_64. > >> armv7 beagleboard x15 results are not available due to infrastructure > >> issues. > >> > >> Note: > >> Newly added

Re: [Lkft-triage] [PATCH 4.9 000/138] 4.9.66-stable review

On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 11:35:15AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 10:07:02AM +, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 09:07:45AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 11:07:01PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > > > > > > Results from

Re: [Lkft-triage] [PATCH 4.9 000/138] 4.9.66-stable review

On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 11:35:15AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 10:07:02AM +, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 09:07:45AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 11:07:01PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > > > > > > Results from

Re: [PATCH 4.9 000/104] 4.9.54-stable review

On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 03:33:47PM +, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 10:23:00AM -0500, Dan Rue wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 07:11:55AM +, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 03:37:43PM -0500, Tom Gall wrote: > > > &g

Re: [PATCH 4.9 000/104] 4.9.54-stable review

On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 03:33:47PM +, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 10:23:00AM -0500, Dan Rue wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 07:11:55AM +, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 03:37:43PM -0500, Tom Gall wrote: > > > &g

Re: [PATCH 4.9 000/104] 4.9.54-stable review

On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 07:11:55AM +, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 03:37:43PM -0500, Tom Gall wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 8, 2017 at 2:23 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman > > wrote: > > >> kernel: 4.9.54-rc1 > > >> git repo: > > >>

Re: [PATCH 4.9 000/104] 4.9.54-stable review

On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 07:11:55AM +, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 03:37:43PM -0500, Tom Gall wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 8, 2017 at 2:23 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman > > wrote: > > >> kernel: 4.9.54-rc1 > > >> git repo: > > >>

<    1   2   3