Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 04:09:24PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Thursday, 5 July 2007 15:46, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>> > I have a model for STD that avoids the need to freeze the entirity of
>> > userspace, but I need to find some more time to
Olivier Galibert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 06:50:56AM +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
>
>> I'm perfectly willing to think through some alternate approach if you
>> suggest something or prod my thinking in a new direction, but I'm
>> afraid I just can't see right now how w
G'day. One of the machines I maintain is having real trouble with the
AIC79XX HBA or the tape drive attached to it. I believe this is a
hardware fault, but I am not certain where the problem lies.
Normally I would blame the cable or, maybe, the tape drive, but the
early stage of the fault and th
Lee Revell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 17:19 +1000, Daniel Pittman wrote:
>> I recently installed a SCSI tape drive and Adaptec AHA-2940U2W SCSI
>> controller into my server to run backups.
>>
>> Since then, the driver issues these warnings
I recently installed a SCSI tape drive and Adaptec AHA-2940U2W SCSI
controller into my server to run backups.
Since then, the driver issues these warnings on a semi-regular basis
while the drive is busy:
Aug 9 17:00:26 anu kernel: scsi0: Data Parity Error Detected during address or
write data p
memory. The only fixes I can see would
+ * be getting a kernel allocator that could work in zones, or figuring
+ * out just how to coerce the WP into doing what we want.
*
* The indirection of the various registers means we have to spinlock
* nearly all register accesses. We have the ma
dmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
>> On Thu, 01 Feb 2001, Nils Rennebarth wrote:
>> > Feb 1 12:58:56 obelix kernel: NAT: 0 dropping untracked packet
>> ce767600 1 129.69.22.21 -> 224.0.0.2
>>
>> It means that your box drops multicast administrative p
12 byte regions for the recording wavecaches. This
+ * ends up wasting quite a bit of memory. The only fixes I can see would
+ * be getting a kernel allocator that could work in zones, or figuring
+ * out just how to coerce the WP into doing what we want.
*
* The indirection of t
On Tue, 19 Sep 2000, David Howells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Daniel Pittman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
>> Anyway, why did you see the need for the registry stubs in this case,
>> if I may ask?
>
> Firstly, in wine the registry is handled by the win
9 matches
Mail list logo
