number to 0.6. and some minor cleanups.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Ritz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/usbtouchscreen.c
b/drivers/input/touchscreen/usbtouchscreen.c
index 19055e7..b5a6358 100644
--- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/usbtouchscreen.c
+++ b/drivers
number to 0.6. and some minor cleanups.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Ritz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/usbtouchscreen.c
b/drivers/input/touchscreen/usbtouchscreen.c
index 19055e7..b5a6358 100644
--- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/usbtouchscreen.c
+++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen
does that one help?
[ as attachment since i'm on webmail ]
ACPI: acpi_sleep_prepare() should not depent on CONFIG_SUSPEND
Signed-off-by: Daniel Ritz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
Ist Ihr Browser Vista-kompatibel? Jetzt die neuesten
Browser-Versionen downloaden: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/browser
does that one help?
[ as attachment since i'm on webmail ]
ACPI: acpi_sleep_prepare() should not depent on CONFIG_SUSPEND
Signed-off-by: Daniel Ritz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Ist Ihr Browser Vista-kompatibel? Jetzt die neuesten
Browser-Versionen downloaden: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/browser
acpi
On Thursday 30 August 2007 01:21:50 Luca Tettamanti wrote:
> Il Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 01:29:56AM +0200, Daniel Ritz ha scritto:
> > tried that one on my old toshiba tecra 8000 laptop, almost killing it.
> > the fan doesn't work any more...type 'make' and see the box dying.
>
On Thursday 30 August 2007 01:21:50 Luca Tettamanti wrote:
Il Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 01:29:56AM +0200, Daniel Ritz ha scritto:
tried that one on my old toshiba tecra 8000 laptop, almost killing it.
the fan doesn't work any more...type 'make' and see the box dying.
luckily my CPU doesn't
Thanks,
> Alex.
>
> Daniel Ritz wrote:
> > On Wednesday 29 August 2007 06:41:41 Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
> >
> >> Daniel,
> >> Does this patch help you, or do we need to revert the whole thing?
> >>
> >>
> >
> > yes, this d
just let me know.
rgds
-daniel
> Sorry for the trouble,
> Alex.
> Daniel Ritz wrote:
> > tried that one on my old toshiba tecra 8000 laptop, almost killing it.
> > the fan doesn't work any more...type 'make' and see the box dying.
> > luckily my CPU doesn't comm
know.
rgds
-daniel
Sorry for the trouble,
Alex.
Daniel Ritz wrote:
tried that one on my old toshiba tecra 8000 laptop, almost killing it.
the fan doesn't work any more...type 'make' and see the box dying.
luckily my CPU doesn't commit suicide...bisected it to that one
a different patch just let me know.
rgds
-daniel
Sorry for the trouble,
Alex.
Daniel Ritz wrote:
tried that one on my old toshiba tecra 8000 laptop, almost killing it.
the fan doesn't work any more...type 'make' and see the box dying.
luckily my CPU doesn't commit
tried that one on my old toshiba tecra 8000 laptop, almost killing it.
the fan doesn't work any more...type 'make' and see the box dying.
luckily my CPU doesn't commit suicide...bisected it to that one:
cd8c93a4e04dce8f00d1ef3a476aac8bd65ae40b is first bad commit
commit
tried that one on my old toshiba tecra 8000 laptop, almost killing it.
the fan doesn't work any more...type 'make' and see the box dying.
luckily my CPU doesn't commit suicide...bisected it to that one:
cd8c93a4e04dce8f00d1ef3a476aac8bd65ae40b is first bad commit
commit
can be downloaded at
http://projects.tbmn.org/cgi-bin/trac.cgi/wiki/urtc-1000
Signed-off-by: Ondrej Zary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Ritz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff -ur linux-2.6.23-rc3-orig/drivers/input/touchscreen/Kconfig
linux-2.6.23-rc3/drivers/input/touchscreen/Kc
be downloaded at
http://projects.tbmn.org/cgi-bin/trac.cgi/wiki/urtc-1000
Signed-off-by: Ondrej Zary [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Ritz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff -ur linux-2.6.23-rc3-orig/drivers/input/touchscreen/Kconfig
linux-2.6.23-rc3/drivers/input/touchscreen/Kconfig
--- linux
[ please don't send patches as attachment.. ]
On Thursday 23 August 2007 23:55:28 Ondrej Zary wrote:
> Hello,
> this patch adds support for IdealTEK URTC1000 touchscreen controllers.
>
looks good, just a few minor things...
> Documentation can be downloaded at
>
[ please don't send patches as attachment.. ]
On Thursday 23 August 2007 23:55:28 Ondrej Zary wrote:
Hello,
this patch adds support for IdealTEK URTC1000 touchscreen controllers.
looks good, just a few minor things...
Documentation can be downloaded at
On Friday 03 August 2007 02:18:10 Yinghai Lu wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Thu, 02 Aug 2007 16:24:42 -0700
> > Yinghai Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Daniel Ritz wrote:
> >>> commit 18a8bd949d6adb311ea816125ff65050df1f3f6e break
On Friday 03 August 2007 02:18:10 Yinghai Lu wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 02 Aug 2007 16:24:42 -0700
Yinghai Lu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Daniel Ritz wrote:
commit 18a8bd949d6adb311ea816125ff65050df1f3f6e breaks serial_cs badly
with an oops, completely killing PCMCIA
commit 18a8bd949d6adb311ea816125ff65050df1f3f6e breaks serial_cs badly
with an oops, completely killing PCMCIA.
register_console() now calls console->early_setup(). which in case of
8250.c (the only user anyway) is serial8250_console_early_setup()
which is __init, calling
commit 18a8bd949d6adb311ea816125ff65050df1f3f6e breaks serial_cs badly
with an oops, completely killing PCMCIA.
register_console() now calls console-early_setup(). which in case of
8250.c (the only user anyway) is serial8250_console_early_setup()
which is __init, calling
looks good.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Ritz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- forwarded message ---
Hello,
this patch adds support for IRTOUCHSYSTEMS (or UNITOP) infrared touchscreens.
The manufacturer (http://www.irtouch.com) provides only closed source drivers
for specific kernel versions (looks li
looks good.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Ritz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- forwarded message ---
Hello,
this patch adds support for IRTOUCHSYSTEMS (or UNITOP) infrared touchscreens.
The manufacturer (http://www.irtouch.com) provides only closed source drivers
for specific kernel versions (looks like GPL
dmitry was a bad boy...:)
Signed-off-by: Daniel Ritz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Original Message
Subject: [PATCH] Fix broken ifdefs in usbtouchscreen
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 17:09:50 +0200
From: Ondrej Zary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: linux-kernel@vge
dmitry was a bad boy...:)
Signed-off-by: Daniel Ritz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Original Message
Subject: [PATCH] Fix broken ifdefs in usbtouchscreen
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 17:09:50 +0200
From: Ondrej Zary [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Hello
[PATCH] usbtouchscreen: add support for DMC TSC-10/25 devices
From: Holger Schurig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Adds support for the DMC TSC-10 and TSC-25 usb touchscreen controllers.
Signed-off-by: Holger Schurig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Ritz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
di
[PATCH] usbtouchscreen: add support for DMC TSC-10/25 devices
From: Holger Schurig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Adds support for the DMC TSC-10 and TSC-25 usb touchscreen controllers.
Signed-off-by: Holger Schurig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Ritz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff --git a/drivers/usb
hi
On Thursday 16 November 2006 11.25, Holger Schurig wrote:
> From: Holger Schurig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Generic calibration support for usbtouchscreen.
>
> Signed-off-by: Holger Schurig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> ---
>
> With build-in calibration support, the "swap_xy" kernel parameter
>
s on USB_TOUCHSCREEN
> +
> config USB_TOUCHSCREEN_EGALAX
> default y
> bool "eGalax, eTurboTouch CT-410/510/700 device support" if EMBEDDED
> --- linux.orig/drivers/usb/input/usbtouchscreen.c
> +++ linux/drivers/usb/input/usbtouchscreen.c
> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
> *
TouchSet
* - eTurboTouch
* - Gunze AHL61
+ * - DMC TSC-10 (Holger Schurig, [EMAIL PROTECTED])
* - DMC TSC-10/TSC-25 (Holger Schurig, [EMAIL PROTECTED])
*
* Copyright (C) 2004-2006 by Daniel Ritz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Copyright (C) by Todd E. Johnson (mtouchusb.c)
@@ -44,7 +45,7
hi
On Thursday 16 November 2006 11.25, Holger Schurig wrote:
From: Holger Schurig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Generic calibration support for usbtouchscreen.
Signed-off-by: Holger Schurig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
With build-in calibration support, the swap_xy kernel parameter
vanishes and
hi
On Wednesday 31 August 2005 14.12, Marc Ballarin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> -rc6-mm2 breaks USB unplug for me. Happens with every USB device,
> gcc-3.3.5 and gcc-3.4.4 as well as preempt and non-preempt and is 100%
> reproducible.
> -rc6-mm1 seems fine.
>
> Reverting the following part of
>
hi
On Wednesday 31 August 2005 14.12, Marc Ballarin wrote:
Hi,
-rc6-mm2 breaks USB unplug for me. Happens with every USB device,
gcc-3.3.5 and gcc-3.4.4 as well as preempt and non-preempt and is 100%
reproducible.
-rc6-mm1 seems fine.
Reverting the following part of
in device_attach() if dev->driver is set. but since
some drivers are messing with dev->driver directly this is not a good idea.
and while at it replace spin_(un|)lock_irq in driver_detach with the non-irq
variants. just doesn't make sense to me. the whole klist locking never uses t
idea.
and while at it replace spin_(un|)lock_irq in driver_detach with the non-irq
variants. just doesn't make sense to me. the whole klist locking never uses the
irq variants.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Ritz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff --git a/drivers/base/bus.c b/drivers/base/bus.c
--- a/drivers/base
e device is bound.
also remove the dev->drv check in bus_rescan_devices_helper().
and while at it replace spin_(un|)lock_irq in driver_detach with the non-irq
variants. just doesn't make sense to me. the whole klist locking never uses the
irq variants.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Ritz <[EMAIL PR
the device is bound.
also remove the dev-drv check in bus_rescan_devices_helper().
and while at it replace spin_(un|)lock_irq in driver_detach with the non-irq
variants. just doesn't make sense to me. the whole klist locking never uses the
irq variants.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Ritz [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Saturday 30 July 2005 22.49, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Saturday, 30 of July 2005 21:10, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > Please revert the yenta free_irq on suspend patch (below)
> > which went into 2.6.13-rc4 after 2.6.13-rc3-git9.
> >
> > Sorry Daniel, you may have a box on which resume doesn't
On Saturday 30 July 2005 22.49, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Saturday, 30 of July 2005 21:10, Hugh Dickins wrote:
Please revert the yenta free_irq on suspend patch (below)
which went into 2.6.13-rc4 after 2.6.13-rc3-git9.
Sorry Daniel, you may have a box on which resume doesn't work
On Monday 25 July 2005 21.38, Peter Staubach wrote:
> Daniel Ritz wrote:
[...]
>
> Shouldn't the two pairs of calls to config_writeb() be using
> "O2_RES_READ_PREFETCH | O2_RES_WRITE_BURST" instead of
> "O2_RES_READ_PREFETCH | O2_RES_READ_PREFETCH"?
>
On Monday 25 July 2005 21.38, Peter Staubach wrote:
Daniel Ritz wrote:
[...]
Shouldn't the two pairs of calls to config_writeb() be using
O2_RES_READ_PREFETCH | O2_RES_WRITE_BURST instead of
O2_RES_READ_PREFETCH | O2_RES_READ_PREFETCH?
yes, of course. thanks for noticing. updated patch
-daniel
---
[PATCH] yenta: free_irq() on suspend.
Resume doesn't seem to work without.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Ritz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff --git a/drivers/pcmcia/yenta_socket.c b/drivers/pcmcia/yenta_socket.c
--- a/drivers/pcmcia/yenta_socket.c
+++ b/drivers/pcmcia/yenta_so
O2Micro bridges have problems with both read prefetch and write burst
depending on the combination of the chipset, bridge, cardbus card. safest
is to disable read prefetch and write burst on those old bridges.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Ritz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff --git a/drivers/pcmcia/o2mic
O2Micro bridges have problems with both read prefetch and write burst
depending on the combination of the chipset, bridge, cardbus card. safest
is to disable read prefetch and write burst on those old bridges.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Ritz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff --git a/drivers/pcmcia/o2micro.h b
-daniel
---
[PATCH] yenta: free_irq() on suspend.
Resume doesn't seem to work without.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Ritz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff --git a/drivers/pcmcia/yenta_socket.c b/drivers/pcmcia/yenta_socket.c
--- a/drivers/pcmcia/yenta_socket.c
+++ b/drivers/pcmcia/yenta_socket.c
On Tuesday 19 April 2005 00:19, Peter Baumann wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 10:26:43PM +0200, Daniel Ritz wrote:
> > from your dmesg:
> > PCI: :00:0b.0 pmc: 7601, current_state, pmcsr: 00040, new:
> > ACPI: PCI Interrupt :00:0b.0[A] -> GSI 19 (level,
On Tuesday 19 April 2005 00:19, Peter Baumann wrote:
On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 10:26:43PM +0200, Daniel Ritz wrote:
from your dmesg:
PCI: :00:0b.0 pmc: 7601, current_state, pmcsr: 00040, new:
ACPI: PCI Interrupt :00:0b.0[A] - GSI 19 (level, low) - IRQ 19
3c59x: Donald
On Friday 15 April 2005 08:43, Peter Baumann wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 07:40:52PM +0200, Daniel Ritz wrote:
> >
> > could you apply this debuggin patch instead and send me the dmsg output
> > plus output from lspci, lspci -vvvn. also please send me a hexdump from
>
On Friday 15 April 2005 08:43, Peter Baumann wrote:
On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 07:40:52PM +0200, Daniel Ritz wrote:
could you apply this debuggin patch instead and send me the dmsg output
plus output from lspci, lspci -vvvn. also please send me a hexdump from
/proc/bus/pci/00/0b.0
i
you should have a look at http://linux.chapter7.ch/touchkit/
it contains a howto and a calibration progam. it's centered around
touchscreens with eGalax controllers but the info there is valid for
about every touchscreen as long as the driver uses the linux input
subsystem (it really should).
you should have a look at http://linux.chapter7.ch/touchkit/
it contains a howto and a calibration progam. it's centered around
touchscreens with eGalax controllers but the info there is valid for
about every touchscreen as long as the driver uses the linux input
subsystem (it really should).
On Thursday 14 April 2005 00:41, Peter Baumann wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 09:24:04PM +0200, Daniel Ritz wrote:
> > On Tuesday 12 April 2005 11:09, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > Peter Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Mar 2
On Thursday 14 April 2005 00:41, Peter Baumann wrote:
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 09:24:04PM +0200, Daniel Ritz wrote:
On Tuesday 12 April 2005 11:09, Andrew Morton wrote:
Peter Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 06:52:25PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
Peter
On Tuesday 12 April 2005 11:09, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Peter Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 06:52:25PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > Peter Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I'm hitting an annoying bug in kernel 2.6.11.5
> > > >
> >
On Tuesday 12 April 2005 11:09, Andrew Morton wrote:
Peter Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 06:52:25PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
Peter Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm hitting an annoying bug in kernel 2.6.11.5
Every time I _reboot_
On Sunday 03 April 2005 16:02, Daniel Drake wrote:
> Peter Baumann wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 06:52:25PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> >>Peter Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>>I'm hitting an annoying bug in kernel 2.6.11.5
> >>>
> >>>Every time I _reboot_ (warmstart)
On Sunday 03 April 2005 16:02, Daniel Drake wrote:
Peter Baumann wrote:
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 06:52:25PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
Peter Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm hitting an annoying bug in kernel 2.6.11.5
Every time I _reboot_ (warmstart) my pc my two network cards
On Monday 21 March 2005 01:46, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> Do you think your recent work on ti12xx_hook() will help this guy?
may be. it really sounds like the exact same problem..
>
> (Did a patch come out of that, btw?)
the one i sent was buggy for those reasons:
- the TI hook function override
On Monday 21 March 2005 01:46, Andrew Morton wrote:
Do you think your recent work on ti12xx_hook() will help this guy?
may be. it really sounds like the exact same problem..
(Did a patch come out of that, btw?)
the one i sent was buggy for those reasons:
- the TI hook function override
On Saturday 19 March 2005 09:05, Jonas Oreland wrote:
> Hi again and thx again,
>
> SUMMARY: It's working with new hook (wo/ trying second part)
> I'll post again if error comes up again.
that's good news!
>
> Daniel Ritz wrote:
> > On Saturday 19 March 2005 00
On Saturday 19 March 2005 09:05, Jonas Oreland wrote:
Hi again and thx again,
SUMMARY: It's working with new hook (wo/ trying second part)
I'll post again if error comes up again.
that's good news!
Daniel Ritz wrote:
On Saturday 19 March 2005 00:00, Jonas Oreland wrote
On Saturday 19 March 2005 00:00, Jonas Oreland wrote:
> Daniel Ritz wrote:
> > hi
>
> Hi
>
> Thanks for your effort!
>
> >
> > it's the second time now i see this problem with an atheros chipset in
> > combination with a TI bridge. last time it was t
hook points of course). this is the
cleanest way i can think of. and it allows adding more workarounds
for more problems...
for the TI specific interrupt on-off stuff just save the MFUNC register
and set it to 0 to disable all interrupts, restore it afterwards.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Ritz <[EM
hook points of course). this is the
cleanest way i can think of. and it allows adding more workarounds
for more problems...
for the TI specific interrupt on-off stuff just save the MFUNC register
and set it to 0 to disable all interrupts, restore it afterwards.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Ritz [EMAIL
On Saturday 19 March 2005 00:00, Jonas Oreland wrote:
Daniel Ritz wrote:
hi
Hi
Thanks for your effort!
it's the second time now i see this problem with an atheros chipset in
combination with a TI bridge. last time it was the 1225...
attached a patch that could help
64 matches
Mail list logo