Re: [ANNOUNCE] v5.9-rc2-rt1

2020-08-27 Thread Daniel Vacek
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 2:49 PM Daniel Wagner wrote: > > > Would be interesting to see the size numbers for v5.6-rt? Hmm, I'll > > just start the compiler. It's all scripted anyway :) > > v5.6-rt: > > -rw-r--r-- 1 wagi users 28688896 Aug 27 13:38 rpi3-image-ll-v5.6.19-rt12 > -rw-r--r-- 1 wagi user

Re: [tip:locking/core] sched/wake_q: Reduce reference counting for special users

2019-02-12 Thread Daniel Vacek
> diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c > index 69e619baf709..2abe1a0b3062 100644 > --- a/kernel/futex.c > +++ b/kernel/futex.c > @@ -1463,8 +1463,7 @@ static void mark_wake_futex(struct wake_q_head *wake_q, > struct futex_q *q) >* Queue the task for later wakeup for after we've rel

Re: [tip:x86/timers] x86/tsc: Make calibration refinement more robust

2019-01-16 Thread Daniel Vacek
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 10:03 PM Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > No. The branch was not sent to Linus during the merge window due to holiday > season induced oversight. So does it wait for the next merge window now or is it still going to be sent? This is actually worth stable branches. I've confirmat

Re: [tip:x86/timers] x86/tsc: Make calibration refinement more robust

2019-01-08 Thread Daniel Vacek
Hi Thomas, Ingo, Peter. I'm wondering, was x86/timers branch of tip tree merged to linus' tree for v5.0-rc1? Somehow I do not see this patch make it through... Am I doing something wrong? --nX On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 9:58 PM tip-bot for Daniel Vacek wrote: >

[tip:x86/timers] x86/tsc: Make calibration refinement more robust

2018-11-06 Thread tip-bot for Daniel Vacek
Commit-ID: a786ef152cdcfebc923a67f63c7815806eefcf81 Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/a786ef152cdcfebc923a67f63c7815806eefcf81 Author: Daniel Vacek AuthorDate: Mon, 5 Nov 2018 18:10:40 +0100 Committer: Thomas Gleixner CommitDate: Tue, 6 Nov 2018 21:53:15 +0100 x86/tsc: Make

[PATCH v2] x86/tsc: make calibration refinement more robust

2018-11-05 Thread Daniel Vacek
instead of simply bailing out unrefined. Usually the next second the readout returns fast just fine without any issues. v2: keep using the constant early when the tsc_khz is not available yet as suggested by tglx Signed-off-by: Daniel Vacek --- arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c | 30

Re: [PATCH] tsc: make calibration refinement more robust

2018-11-05 Thread Daniel Vacek
On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 11:04 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > Daniel, > > On Fri, 2 Nov 2018, Daniel Vacek wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 4:34 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> >> -#define MAX_RETRIES 5 >> >> -#define SMI_TRESHOLD5 >> >> +

Re: [PATCH] tsc: make calibration refinement more robust

2018-11-01 Thread Daniel Vacek
Hi Thomas, thanks for checking. On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 4:34 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > Daniel, > > On Thu, 1 Nov 2018, Daniel Vacek wrote: > > Please use 'x86/tsc:' as prefix. git log path/to/file usually gives you a > reasonable hint about prefixes. Oh, sure th

[PATCH] tsc: make calibration refinement more robust

2018-11-01 Thread Daniel Vacek
bailing out unrefined. Usually the next second the readout returns fast just fine without any issues. Signed-off-by: Daniel Vacek --- arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c | 21 +++-- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c index

Re: [PATCH] Revert "mm: page_alloc: skip over regions of invalid pfns where possible"

2018-06-25 Thread Daniel Vacek
I do not remember exactly but I guess I used either get_maintainers script or the email from your commit. I'm sorry for the inconvenience. > On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 03:38:55PM +0100, Daniel Vacek wrote: >> This reverts commit b92df1de5d289c0b5d653e72414bf0850b8511e0. The commit

Re: [PATCH v8 0/6] optimize memblock_next_valid_pfn and early_pfn_valid on arm and arm64

2018-05-04 Thread Daniel Vacek
On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 6:53 PM, Pavel Tatashin wrote: >> I'm wondering, ain't simple enabling of config >> DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT provide even better speed-up? If that is the >> case then it seems like this series is not needed at all, right? >> I am not sure why is this config optional. It loo

Re: [PATCH v8 0/6] optimize memblock_next_valid_pfn and early_pfn_valid on arm and arm64

2018-05-04 Thread Daniel Vacek
On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 4:45 AM, Jia He wrote: > Ping > > Sorry if I am a little bit verbose, but it can speedup the arm64 booting > time indeed. I'm wondering, ain't simple enabling of config DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT provide even better speed-up? If that is the case then it seems like this serie

Re: [PATCH v7 2/5] arm: arm64: page_alloc: reduce unnecessary binary search in memblock_next_valid_pfn()

2018-04-06 Thread Daniel Vacek
On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 11:09 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 05:50:54AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 08:44:12PM +0800, Jia He wrote: >> > >> > >> > On 4/5/2018 7:34 PM, Matthew Wilcox Wrote: >> > > On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 01:04:35AM -0700, J

Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] arm: arm64: page_alloc: reduce unnecessary binary search in memblock_next_valid_pfn()

2018-04-02 Thread Daniel Vacek
On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 8:57 AM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > On 2 April 2018 at 04:30, Jia He wrote: >> Commit b92df1de5d28 ("mm: page_alloc: skip over regions of invalid pfns >> where possible") optimized the loop in memmap_init_zone(). But there is >> still some room for improvement. E.g. if pfn and

Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] arm: arm64: page_alloc: reduce unnecessary binary search in memblock_next_valid_pfn()

2018-04-02 Thread Daniel Vacek
On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 4:30 AM, Jia He wrote: > Commit b92df1de5d28 ("mm: page_alloc: skip over regions of invalid pfns > where possible") optimized the loop in memmap_init_zone(). But there is > still some room for improvement. E.g. if pfn and pfn+1 are in the same > memblock region, we can simpl

Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] arm64: introduce pfn_valid_region()

2018-03-30 Thread Daniel Vacek
On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 10:15 AM, Jia He wrote: > This is the preparation for further optimizing in early_pfn_valid > on arm and arm64. > > Signed-off-by: Jia He > --- > arch/arm/include/asm/page.h | 3 ++- > arch/arm/mm/init.c| 23 +++ > arch/arm64/include/asm

Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] mm: page_alloc: remain memblock_next_valid_pfn() on arm and arm64

2018-03-30 Thread Daniel Vacek
On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 10:15 AM, Jia He wrote: > Commit b92df1de5d28 ("mm: page_alloc: skip over regions of invalid pfns > where possible") optimized the loop in memmap_init_zone(). But it causes > possible panic bug. So Daniel Vacek reverted it later. > > But as suggest

Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] mm: page_alloc: remain memblock_next_valid_pfn() when CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_PFN_VALID is enable

2018-03-28 Thread Daniel Vacek
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 11:26 AM, Jia He wrote: > > > On 3/28/2018 12:52 AM, Daniel Vacek Wrote: >> >> On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 1:24 PM, Jia He wrote: >>> >>> Commit b92df1de5d28 ("mm: page_alloc: skip over regions of invalid pfns >>> where pos

Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] mm: page_alloc: reduce unnecessary binary search in early_pfn_valid()

2018-03-27 Thread Daniel Vacek
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 5:02 AM, Jia He wrote: > Commit b92df1de5d28 ("mm: page_alloc: skip over regions of invalid pfns > where possible") optimized the loop in memmap_init_zone(). But there is > still some room for improvement. E.g. in early_pfn_valid(), if pfn and > pfn+1 are in the same memblo

Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] mm: page_alloc: reduce unnecessary binary search in memblock_next_valid_pfn()

2018-03-27 Thread Daniel Vacek
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 5:02 AM, Jia He wrote: > Commit b92df1de5d28 ("mm: page_alloc: skip over regions of invalid pfns > where possible") optimized the loop in memmap_init_zone(). But there is > still some room for improvement. E.g. if pfn and pfn+1 are in the same > memblock region, we can simp

Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] mm: page_alloc: remain memblock_next_valid_pfn() when CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_PFN_VALID is enable

2018-03-27 Thread Daniel Vacek
On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 1:24 PM, Jia He wrote: > Commit b92df1de5d28 ("mm: page_alloc: skip over regions of invalid pfns > where possible") optimized the loop in memmap_init_zone(). But it causes > possible panic bug. So Daniel Vacek reverted it later. > > But membloc

Re: [PATCH 1/4] mm: page_alloc: reduce unnecessary binary search in memblock_next_valid_pfn()

2018-03-21 Thread Daniel Vacek
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 1:28 PM, Jia He wrote: > > On 3/21/2018 6:14 PM, Daniel Vacek Wrote: >> >> On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 9:09 AM, Jia He wrote: >>> >>> Commit b92df1de5d28 ("mm: page_alloc: skip over regions of invalid pfns >>> where possib

Re: [PATCH 2/4] mm/memblock: introduce memblock_search_pfn_regions()

2018-03-21 Thread Daniel Vacek
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 9:09 AM, Jia He wrote: > This api is the preparation for further optimizing early_pfn_valid > > Signed-off-by: Jia He > --- > include/linux/memblock.h | 2 ++ > mm/memblock.c| 12 > 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/include/linux

Re: [PATCH 1/4] mm: page_alloc: reduce unnecessary binary search in memblock_next_valid_pfn()

2018-03-21 Thread Daniel Vacek
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 9:09 AM, Jia He wrote: > Commit b92df1de5d28 ("mm: page_alloc: skip over regions of invalid pfns > where possible") optimized the loop in memmap_init_zone(). But there is > still some room for improvement. E.g. if pfn and pfn+1 are in the same > memblock region, we can simp

Re: [PATCH] Revert "mm: page_alloc: skip over regions of invalid pfns where possible"

2018-03-16 Thread Daniel Vacek
Sorry I forgot to Cc: Paul Burton --nX On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 3:38 PM, Daniel Vacek wrote: > This reverts commit b92df1de5d289c0b5d653e72414bf0850b8511e0. The commit > is meant to be a boot init speed up skipping the loop in memmap_init_zone() > for invalid pfns. But given some

[PATCH] Revert "mm: page_alloc: skip over regions of invalid pfns where possible"

2018-03-16 Thread Daniel Vacek
0 1 1f Fixes: b92df1de5d28 ("mm: page_alloc: skip over regions of invalid pfns where possible") Signed-off-by: Daniel Vacek Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: Michal Hocko Cc: Vlastimil Babka Cc: Mel Gorman Cc: Pavel Tatashin Cc: Paul Burton C

Re: [PATCH] mm/page_alloc: fix boot hang in memmap_init_zone

2018-03-15 Thread Daniel Vacek
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 3:08 PM, Jia He wrote: > Hi Daniel > > > > On 3/14/2018 6:42 AM, Daniel Vacek Wrote: >> >> On some architectures (reported on arm64) commit 864b75f9d6b01 >> ("mm/page_alloc: fix memmap_init_zone pageblock alignment") >> cau

Re: [PATCH v2] Revert "mm/page_alloc: fix memmap_init_zone pageblock alignment"

2018-03-15 Thread Daniel Vacek
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 4:17 PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > On 15 March 2018 at 15:12, Daniel Vacek wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 8:45 AM, Ard Biesheuvel >> wrote: >>> On 15 March 2018 at 07:44, Daniel Vacek wrote: >>>> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 8:36 AM, Ard

Re: [PATCH v2] Revert "mm/page_alloc: fix memmap_init_zone pageblock alignment"

2018-03-15 Thread Daniel Vacek
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 8:45 AM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > On 15 March 2018 at 07:44, Daniel Vacek wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 8:36 AM, Ard Biesheuvel >> wrote: >>> On 15 March 2018 at 02:23, Daniel Vacek wrote: >>>> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 8:29 PM, Ar

Re: [PATCH] mm/page_alloc: fix boot hang in memmap_init_zone

2018-03-15 Thread Daniel Vacek
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 12:50 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Thu 15-03-18 02:30:41, Daniel Vacek wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 3:17 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: >> > On Tue 13-03-18 23:42:40, Daniel Vacek wrote: >> >> On some architectures (reported on arm64) co

Re: [PATCH v2] Revert "mm/page_alloc: fix memmap_init_zone pageblock alignment"

2018-03-15 Thread Daniel Vacek
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 8:36 AM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > On 15 March 2018 at 02:23, Daniel Vacek wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 8:29 PM, Ard Biesheuvel >> wrote: >>> This reverts commit 864b75f9d6b0100bb24fdd9a20d156e7cda9b5ae. >>> >>>

Re: [PATCH] Revert "mm/page_alloc: fix memmap_init_zone pageblock alignment"

2018-03-15 Thread Daniel Vacek
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 7:39 AM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > On 15 March 2018 at 02:32, Daniel Vacek wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 6:36 PM, Ard Biesheuvel >> wrote: >>> On 14 March 2018 at 16:41, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: >>>> On 14 March 2018 at 15:54, Ard

Re: [PATCH] Revert "mm/page_alloc: fix memmap_init_zone pageblock alignment"

2018-03-14 Thread Daniel Vacek
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 6:36 PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > On 14 March 2018 at 16:41, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: >> On 14 March 2018 at 15:54, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: >>> On 14 March 2018 at 14:54, Michal Hocko wrote: On Wed 14-03-18 14:35:12, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > On 14 March 2018 at 14:13,

Re: [PATCH v2] Revert "mm/page_alloc: fix memmap_init_zone pageblock alignment"

2018-03-14 Thread Daniel Vacek
ermediate values following an invalid PFN, we > may still hit the same VM_BUG_ON() as before. > > So instead, let's fix this at the core, and ensure that the BUG > check doesn't dereference struct page fields of invalid pages. > > Fixes: 864b75f9d6b0 ("mm/page_alloc

Re: [PATCH] mm/page_alloc: fix boot hang in memmap_init_zone

2018-03-14 Thread Daniel Vacek
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 3:17 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Tue 13-03-18 23:42:40, Daniel Vacek wrote: >> On some architectures (reported on arm64) commit 864b75f9d6b01 >> ("mm/page_alloc: fix memmap_init_zone pageblock alignment") >> causes a boot hang. This patch

Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] mm/page_alloc: fix memmap_init_zone pageblock alignment

2018-03-13 Thread Daniel Vacek
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 7:34 AM, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > On 12 March 2018 at 22:21, Daniel Vacek wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 3:49 PM, Naresh Kamboju >> wrote: >>> On 12 March 2018 at 17:56, Sudeep Holla wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>&g

[PATCH] mm/page_alloc: fix boot hang in memmap_init_zone

2018-03-13 Thread Daniel Vacek
1520011945.git.ne...@redhat.com Fixes: 864b75f9d6b01 ("mm/page_alloc: fix memmap_init_zone pageblock alignment") Signed-off-by: Daniel Vacek Tested-by: Sudeep Holla Tested-by: Naresh Kamboju Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: Mel Gorman Cc: Michal Hocko Cc: Paul Burton Cc: Pavel Tatashin Cc:

Re: [PATCH 4.15 049/146] mm/page_alloc: fix memmap_init_zone pageblock alignment

2018-03-13 Thread Daniel Vacek
ey 620 (both arm64). The fix has been proposed and tested but is not > yet in mainline per https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/12/710 I'll send a formal fix today. > Dan > >> >> -- >> >> From: Daniel Vacek >> >> commit 864b75f9d6b01

Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] mm/page_alloc: fix memmap_init_zone pageblock alignment

2018-03-12 Thread Daniel Vacek
[0.00] node 0: [mem 0xfe5d-0xfe5d] >> [0.00] node 0: [mem 0xfe5e-0xfe62] >> [0.00] node 0: [mem 0xfe63-0xfeff] >> [0.00] node 0: [mem 0x00088000-0x0009ff

Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] mm/page_alloc: fix memmap_init_zone pageblock alignment

2018-03-02 Thread Daniel Vacek
On Sat, Mar 3, 2018 at 1:40 AM, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Sat, 3 Mar 2018 01:12:26 +0100 Daniel Vacek wrote: > >> Commit b92df1de5d28 ("mm: page_alloc: skip over regions of invalid pfns >> where possible") introduced a bug where move_freepages() triggers a >>

[PATCH v3 2/2] mm/page_alloc: fix memmap_init_zone pageblock alignment

2018-03-02 Thread Daniel Vacek
re minimum of pages is initialized preventing the crash as well. Fixes: b92df1de5d28 ("mm: page_alloc: skip over regions of invalid pfns where possible") Signed-off-by: Daniel Vacek Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org --- mm/page_alloc.c | 9 +++-- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+),

[PATCH v3 0/2] mm/page_alloc: fix kernel BUG at mm/page_alloc.c:1913! crash in move_freepages()

2018-03-02 Thread Daniel Vacek
p. No code changes compared to v2 and second patch is identical to original v1. Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org Daniel Vacek (2): mm/memblock: hardcode the max_pfn being -1 mm/page_alloc: fix memmap_init_zone pageblock alignment mm/memblock.c | 13 ++--- mm/page_alloc.c | 9 +++-- 2

[PATCH v3 1/2] mm/memblock: hardcode the end_pfn being -1

2018-03-02 Thread Daniel Vacek
This is just a clean up. It aids preventing to handle the special end case in the next commit. Signed-off-by: Daniel Vacek Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org --- mm/memblock.c | 13 ++--- mm/page_alloc.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b

Re: [PATCH] mm/page_alloc: fix memmap_init_zone pageblock alignment

2018-03-02 Thread Daniel Vacek
On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 2:01 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Thu 01-03-18 17:20:04, Daniel Vacek wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 4:27 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: >> > On Thu 01-03-18 16:09:35, Daniel Vacek wrote: >> > [...] >> >> $ grep 7b7ff000 /proc/iom

[PATCH v2] mm/page_alloc: fix memmap_init_zone pageblock alignment

2018-03-02 Thread Daniel Vacek
to pageblock alignment. To fix this, simply align the skipped pfns in memmap_init_zone() the same way as in move_freepages_block(). Fixes: b92df1de5d28 ("mm: page_alloc: skip over regions of invalid pfns where possible") Signed-off-by: Daniel Vacek Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org --

Re: [PATCH] mm/page_alloc: fix memmap_init_zone pageblock alignment

2018-03-02 Thread Daniel Vacek
On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 5:20 PM, Daniel Vacek wrote: > On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 4:27 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: >> It is still not clear why not to do the alignment in >> memblock_next_valid_pfn rather than its caller. > > As it's the mem init which needs it to be aligne

Re: [PATCH] mm/page_alloc: fix memmap_init_zone pageblock alignment

2018-03-01 Thread Daniel Vacek
On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 4:27 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Thu 01-03-18 16:09:35, Daniel Vacek wrote: >> From registers and stack I digged start_page points to >> e31d01ed8000 (note that this is >> page e31d01edffc0 aligned to pageblock) and I can see this in memory

Re: [PATCH] mm/page_alloc: fix memmap_init_zone pageblock alignment

2018-03-01 Thread Daniel Vacek
On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 4:27 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Thu 01-03-18 16:09:35, Daniel Vacek wrote: > [...] >> $ grep 7b7ff000 /proc/iomem >> 7b7ff000-7b7f : System RAM > [...] >> After commit b92df1de5d28 machine eventually crashes with: >&g

Re: [PATCH] mm/page_alloc: fix memmap_init_zone pageblock alignment

2018-03-01 Thread Daniel Vacek
e31d01ed8000 7b6000 0 0 On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 2:10 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Thu 01-03-18 13:47:45, Daniel Vacek wrote: >> In move_freepages() a BUG_ON() can be triggered on uninitialized page >> structures >> due to pageblock alignment.

[PATCH] mm/page_alloc: fix memmap_init_zone pageblock alignment

2018-03-01 Thread Daniel Vacek
valid pfns where possible") Signed-off-by: Daniel Vacek Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org --- mm/page_alloc.c | 9 +++-- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c index cb416723538f..9edee36e6a74 100644 --- a/mm/page_alloc.c +++ b/mm/pa

Re: When would be preempt_rt patchet available for 4.2 kernel

2015-09-14 Thread Daniel Vacek
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 3:37 AM, Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Mon, 2015-09-14 at 19:11 +0200, Daniel Vacek wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 1:42 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> > I'm not going to support 4.2. We switched to odd numbers due to 4.1 >> > being a LTS k

Re: When would be preempt_rt patchet available for 4.2 kernel

2015-09-14 Thread Daniel Vacek
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 1:42 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > I'm not going to support 4.2. We switched to odd numbers due to 4.1 > being a LTS kernel. That's odd. --nX -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org M

Re: Patch "efi: Build EFI stub with EFI-appropriate options" has been added to the 3.6-stable tree

2013-04-03 Thread Daniel Vacek
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Matt Fleming wrote: > > On 30/03/13 10:04, Daniel Vacek wrote: > > > > Resending patch. It got lost somewhere. Thanks for pushing Ben. > > I applied this by hand. Your patch appears to be whitespace damaged. You're right. Sorry f

Re: Patch "efi: Build EFI stub with EFI-appropriate options" has been added to the 3.6-stable tree

2013-03-30 Thread Daniel Vacek
Ben. >From 53864fe932aa87be62f1c70944c386cff9bb9130 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Vacek Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 22:06:26 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] efi: fix typo in Makefile Fix a little typo. Signed-off-by: Daniel Vacek Acked-by: Matthew Garrett --- arch/x86/boot/compressed/Makefile |2 +- 1 file changed, 1 i

Re: [PATCH 1/2] megaraid: fix BUG_ON() from incorrect use of delayed work

2012-12-05 Thread Daniel Vacek
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Daniel Vacek wrote: > On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 4:54 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: >> @@ -5190,7 +5188,7 @@ static void >> megasas_aen_polling(struct work_struct *work) >> { >> struct megasas_aen_event *ev = >> -

Re: [PATCH 1/2] megaraid: fix BUG_ON() from incorrect use of delayed work

2012-12-05 Thread Daniel Vacek
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 4:54 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: > @@ -5190,7 +5188,7 @@ static void > megasas_aen_polling(struct work_struct *work) > { > struct megasas_aen_event *ev = > - container_of(work, struct megasas_aen_event, hotplug_work); > + container_of(work, str

Re: [PATCH] efi: Build EFI stub with EFI-appropriate options

2012-10-24 Thread Daniel Vacek
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 7:52 PM, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:32:50PM +0200, Daniel Vacek wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 8:28 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote: >> > On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 08:18:51PM +0200, Daniel Vacek wrote: >> > >> >> s/

Re: [PATCH] efi: Build EFI stub with EFI-appropriate options

2012-10-18 Thread Daniel Vacek
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 8:28 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 08:18:51PM +0200, Daniel Vacek wrote: > >> s/CLFAGS/CFLAGS/ >> >> should go to stable too? > > Crap. Yes. Feel free to send that. --nX 0001-efi-fix-typo-in-Makefile.patch Description: Binary data

Re: [PATCH] efi: Build EFI stub with EFI-appropriate options

2012-10-18 Thread Daniel Vacek
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 12:00 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote: > We can't assume the presence of the red zone while we're still in a boot > services environment, so we should build with -fno-red-zone to avoid > problems. Change the size of wchar at the same time to make string handling > simpler. > > Si