Re: [PATCH 2/2] audit: show (grand)parents information of an audit context

2021-02-03 Thread Daniel Walker (danielwa)
On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 04:44:47PM -0500, Paul Moore wrote: > On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 4:29 PM Daniel Walker wrote: > > From: Phil Zhang > > > > To ease the root cause analysis of SELinux AVCs, this new feature > > traverses task structs to iteratively find all parent processes > > starting with

Re: [PATCH 1/2] audit: show user land backtrace as part of audit context messages

2021-02-02 Thread Daniel Walker (danielwa)
On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 04:35:42PM -0500, Paul Moore wrote: > On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 4:29 PM Daniel Walker wrote: > > From: Victor Kamensky > > > > To efficiently find out where SELinux AVC denial is comming from > > take backtrace of user land process and display it as type=UBACKTRACE > >

Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: boot: dts: add new dts for hellcat & petra

2021-01-25 Thread Daniel Walker (danielwa)
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 08:52:01AM +0100, Michal Simek wrote: > > > >> > >> Long time ago we said that we are not going to push any PL related > >> configurations. It means all below can't be merged. > >> And there are also coding style issues. > > > > You'll need to explain this more. It's

Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: boot: dts: add new dts for hellcat & petra

2021-01-22 Thread Daniel Walker (danielwa)
On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 09:48:53AM +0100, Michal Simek wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > On 1/22/21 12:12 AM, Daniel Walker wrote: > > Add Petra and Hellcat dts file. These platforms are based on > > the Xilinx Zynqmp platform. > > > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Walker > > Cc: xe-linux-exter...@cisco.com > >

Re: [PATCH 2/2] spidev: Add cisco device compatible

2021-01-22 Thread Daniel Walker (danielwa)
On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 01:26:16PM +, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 03:12:36PM -0800, Daniel Walker wrote: > > Add compatible string for Cisco device present on the Cisco Petra > > platform. > > I'm missing patch 1 of this series, what's the story with dependencies? The other

Re: [PATCH 2/2] mtd: spi-nor: intel-spi: fix forced writable option

2020-06-02 Thread Daniel Walker (danielwa)
On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 03:55:21PM +, Jinhua Wu (jinhwu) wrote: > On 2020/5/28, 11:48 PM, "Jinhua Wu" wrote: > Hi Vignesh, > BIOS just locked down parts of flash (such as, code region), others are still > writeable. Once the SPI locked down,it can't be override unless platfrom > reset >

Re: [RFC-PATCH] mtd: spi-nor: add conditional 4B opcodes

2020-05-08 Thread Daniel Walker (danielwa)
On Sat, May 09, 2020 at 12:37:35AM +0530, Pratyush Yadav wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > On 07/05/20 06:13PM, Daniel Walker (danielwa) wrote: > > On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 11:33:46PM +0530, Pratyush Yadav wrote: > > > On 07/05/20 09:20AM, Daniel Walker wrote: > >

Re: [RFC-PATCH] mtd: spi-nor: add conditional 4B opcodes

2020-05-07 Thread Daniel Walker (danielwa)
On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 11:33:46PM +0530, Pratyush Yadav wrote: > On 07/05/20 09:20AM, Daniel Walker wrote: > > Some chips have 4B opcodes, but there is no way to know if they have > > them. This device tree option allows platform owners to force enable 4b > > opcodes when they know their