u did. This is
not a new argument. I remember hearing it in school 25 years ago (so
you know it must be even older than that).
--
David Benfell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
The grand leap of the whale up the Fall of Niagara is esteemed, by all
who have seen it, as one of the finest spectacles in nat
On Sat, Sep 09, 2000 at 08:56:40AM -0400, James Simmons wrote:
>
> Yipes!! I have seen this happen when /etc/inittab is messed up.
>
Why would it only be messed up on a 2.4.0-test kernel and not a 2.2.x
kernel?
--
David Benfell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ 59438240 [e-mail first f
On Sun, Sep 03, 2000 at 02:59:43PM +0200, Pauline Middelink wrote:
>
> Anyway, linux-2.4.0-test7 wont boot on a Cyrix computer.
> test6 has no problems whatsoever and 7 stops right after
> 'Uncompressing kernel...'
>
> Kernel as always compiled for 586.
>
> Sounds familiar? Any solutions/tips?
rmed. Basically, it came down to noting that it's difficult to
move a video card from a laptop and that the problem seemed to have
gone away after I rebooted to 2.2.16 (though I recall now seeing some
corruption while it was booting, but nothing like the full-scale
lockout I had with 2.4.0-t
I was a sys admin the first thing
> we did was swap hardware into another machine to see if it was a hardware
> problem.
>
This is a laptop. The video chipset is Neomagic 2160. The problem
reappeared with a reboot but disappeared when I went back to 2.2.16.
I've built 2.2.17 f
On Sun, Sep 03, 2000 at 09:19:15AM -0700, David Benfell wrote:
>
> On Sun, Sep 03, 2000 at 08:52:59AM -0400, James Simmons wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 2 Sep 2000, David Benfell wrote:
> >
> > > Hello all,
> > >
> > > I've seen this with ear
On Sun, Sep 03, 2000 at 08:52:59AM -0400, James Simmons wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2 Sep 2000, David Benfell wrote:
>
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I've seen this with earlier versions, starting on my old laptop, a
> > Compaq Presario 1250. But I'm now in the inte
y while attempting to sort this out.
Just tell me what to do.
--
David Benfell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ 59438240 [e-mail first for access]
---
There are no physicists in the hottest parts of hell, because the
existence of a "hottest part" implies a temperature difference, and
any marginally compet
8 matches
Mail list logo
