changed, 100 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
I've tested this in a VM and on an Atom laptop, as usual. No
regressions noted.
Tested-by: David H. Gutteridge
Regards,
Dave
i_clone_entry_text();
> pti_clone_kernel_text();
> +
> + debug_checkwx_user();
> }
I've tested this in a VM and on an Atom laptop, as usual. No
regressions noted.
(The version I tested was the latter pulled into tip:
[ tglx: Folded !NX supported fix ])
Tested-by: David H. Gutteridge
Regards,
Dave
in my testing of this patch set.
The only minor thing I noted is that in your previous "v8" patch set
([PATCH 38/39] x86/mm/pti: Add Warning when booting on a PCID capable
CPU), it reports the warning on non-PCID capable CPUs: I think you
intended a bitwise "&", not a logical "&&" in the if statement?
Tested-by: David H. Gutteridge
Regards,
Dave
On Mon, 2018-07-23 at 09:29 +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> Hey David,
>
> On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 11:49:00PM -0400, David H. Gutteridge wrote:
> > Unfortunately, I can trigger a bug in KVM+QEMU with the Bochs VGA
> > driver. (This is the same VM definition I shared with you in
On Fri, 2018-07-20 at 18:22 +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> here are 3 patches which update the PTI-x86-32 patches recently merged
> into the tip-tree. The patches are ordered by importance:
>
> Patch 1: Very important, it fixes a vmalloc-fault in NMI context
>when PTI
On Wed, 2018-07-11 at 13:29 +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> here is version 7 of my patches to enable PTI on x86-32.
> Changes to the previous version are:
>
> * Rebased to v4.18-rc4
>
> * Introduced pti_finalize() which is called after
> mark_readonly() and used to upda
On 09/02/18 10:25, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> here is the second version of my PTI implementation for
> x86_32, based on tip/x86-pti-for-linus. It took a lot longer
> than I had hoped, but there have been a number of obstacles
> on the way. It also isn't the small patch-set anymore that v1
> wa
7 matches
Mail list logo
