Re: 2.6.23-git8: Lock dependency engine debugging failure

Hi Peter, On 10/16/07, Peter Zijlstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 2007-10-15 at 20:28 -0700, David Hubbard wrote: > > I am not subscribed to LKML, so please CC me in replies. I am > > reporting a regression when CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCKDEP is enabled in > > 2.

Re: [lm-sensors] 2.6.23-rc1 regression: hwmon/w83627ehf: wrong fan speed

Hi Stefan, (Replying to everyone on the list, sorry!) On 8/10/07, Stefan Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Should I hardwire correct dividers or pulse per rev in sensors.conf or > is the driver supposed to work the correct dividers out --- like it did > before 2.6.23-rc? The dividers are read-

Re: [lm-sensors] Hardware monitoring subsystem maintainer position is open

Hi Jean, I didn't say I would leave entirely. I plan to stay around and keep helping with the lm-sensors project and hwmon drivers. Thanks! This is great news. David - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More ma

Re: [lm-sensors] Hardware monitoring subsystem maintainer position is open

Hi Rudolf, On 4/10/07, Rudolf Marek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello all, First I would like to thank Jean for his great work even if could be seen as "slow". He did the perfect job, allowing only just perfect code to enter the trees. I completely agree. > I haven't seen anything from Rudo

Re: [lm-sensors] Hardware monitoring subsystem maintainer position is open

Hi Hans, On 4/10/07, Hans de Goede <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Jean Delvare wrote: > Hi all, > > I am resigning from my role as hardware monitoring subsystem > (drivers/hwmon) maintainer. This is too much work for me, I do not have > the necessary bandwidth to review all the incoming patches, in

Re: [lm-sensors] Hardware monitoring subsystem maintainer position is open

Jean, I for one will greatly miss your knowledge and helpful hints when I work on hardware monitoring drivers. I hope you find success in all the things you do! I understand the difficult position you're in, and if there's any way I could convince you to stay, I would. Maybe you would be willing

Re: [lm-sensors] Could the k8temp driver be interfering with ACPI?

Hi Jean, Rudolf, 1* It requires that we modify each driver individually. It's quite a shame that we have to update drivers all around the kernel tree with specific code to workaround a problem which is originally located in a single place (the ACPI subsystem.) That being said this isn't a blocke

Re: [lm-sensors] Could the k8temp driver be interfering with ACPI?

Hi Jean, Is there anything preventing us from doing such a walk and pre-allocate all the I/O ranges? I am not familiar with the ACPI code at all, would you possibly propose a patch doing that? Here's a random idea -- what do you think of it? ACPI already allocates some I/O ranges, which was a