Re: fs corruption in 2.4.0-test11?

2000-12-21 Thread David Weinehall
On Thu, Dec 21, 2000 at 10:31:56AM -0300, Horst von Brand wrote: > David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 04:47:42PM -0800, Larry McVoy wrote: > > > I just need a sanity check - do other pages/blocks sometimes show > > > up in recen

Re: fs corruption in 2.4.0-test11?

2000-12-20 Thread David Weinehall
lp find it. If you can reproduce it on test13-pre3, we have something to worry about, if not, feel happy; one bug less to worry about. /David Weinehall _ _ // David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> /> Northern lights wander

Re: [PATCH] e820 memory detection fix for ThinkPad

2000-12-19 Thread David Weinehall
popw %es If this simple patch solves your problem, great! But in that case, PLEASE add a note telling WHY the assignment is done for every iteration; else some smarthead will probably submit a patch someday in the future along the lines of "assigning this only once makes the loop fas

Re: about linux-2.4.0-test13pre3

2000-12-18 Thread David Weinehall
On Sun, Dec 19, 1999 at 01:23:02PM +0800, linux-kernel wrote: > Hi, > Where can I get the linux-2.4.0-test13pre3 at ftp.xx.kernel.org /pub/linux/kernel/testing/ Where xx is your country-code of preference. /David Wei

Re: SerialATA Release, sortof........

2000-12-18 Thread David Weinehall
the document through Acrobat Distiller to turn it into a .pdf?! /David Weinehall _ _ // David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> /> Northern lights wander \\ // Project MCA Linux hacker// Dance across th

Re: Kernel panic: VFS: LRU block list corrupted

2000-12-16 Thread David Weinehall
ome from klogd, right? klogd has a horrific tendency of destroying all information in the oops, thus it's recommended to call klogd with the '-x' argument to tell it not to decode oops:es. Then, when you get an oops, ru

Re: ext3-0.0.5d questions

2000-12-15 Thread David Weinehall
Read FAQ's, documentation etc. FIRST, then convert your filesystems/install new software etc... /David Weinehall _ _ // David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> /> Northern lights wander \\ // Project MCA Linux hacker

Re: Is there a Linux trademark issue with sun?

2000-12-15 Thread David Weinehall
idea about what he is talking > about. I've seen good Linux related stuff come from Sun and I hardly can > imagine that such a person would make this statement. Ehrm. If I'm not all wrong, Scott McNealy is the CEO of Sun... /David _

Re: Memory subsystem error and freeze on 2.4.0-test12

2000-12-14 Thread David Weinehall
ally > contiguous area of 2^2 = 8 pages, but such an area > wasn't available. Ehrm. 2^2 = 4. /David _ _ // David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> /> Northern lights wander \\ // Project MCA Linux hacker

Re: Linux 2.2.18 release notes

2000-12-12 Thread David Weinehall
Dec 11 00:45 patch-2.2.18.gz now did you?! :^) > from my scanning of the kernel archives, this is the *all time* > largest kernel patch (including 2.3/2.4 patches). Well, this one does contain sync of two platforms (m68k & arm) + the USB-backport and several other b

Re: [Fwd: NTFS repair tools]

2000-12-08 Thread David Weinehall
port (DANGEROUS) Are you f**king nuts?! approach anyway. A strong candidate for Rik van Riel's patch-of-the-month homepage. /David _ _ // David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> /> Northern lights wander \\ // Project MCA Linux hacker// Dance across the winter sky // \> http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: ECN causing problems

2000-11-21 Thread David Weinehall
; > TCP packet dropped (10.204.186.7->x.x.x.x: Protocol=TCP[SYN 0xc0] Port > 1255->2401): Bad TCP flags combination (received on interface 192.168.1.1) > (probable QueSO probe as flags=0xc2) /David Weinehall _ _ // Da

Re: Advanced Linux Kernel/Enterprise Linux Kernel

2000-11-14 Thread David Weinehall
some kind of negation above, shouldn't it?! [snip] /David Weinehall _ _ // David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> /> Northern lights wander \\ // Project MCA Linux hacker// Dance across the

Re: 2.2.17 wont compile on AMD k6@-550

2000-11-10 Thread David Weinehall
t] Error 2 sig11 is typical for overclocking. If this is the case, try using the factory setting. I know there are 550 MHz K6-2's nowadays, but you may not have enough cooling to support it. If it still bugs at a lower clock-ra

Re: Pentium IV-summary

2000-11-08 Thread David Weinehall
nstruction, or will you fix the CPU-detection for non-CPUID processors too?! There are quite a few processors that can be detected properly but aren't (for instance, IBM 486slc/slc2/slc3) /David Weinehall _ _ // David Weinehal

Re: national problems

2000-11-08 Thread David Weinehall
d in Florida as less the difference was about 700 votes. /David _ _ // David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> /> Northern lights wander \\ // Project MCA Linux hacker// Dance across the winter sky // \> http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: Linux 2.2.18pre20

2000-11-07 Thread David Weinehall
On Tue, Nov 07, 2000 at 09:02:36PM -0500, Michael Rothwell wrote: > 64-bit printk. Please consider this one Alan, if not for v2.2.18, then at least for v2.2.19pre1. /David _ _ // David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> /&

Re: That Dirty Son of a Bitch, Bill Gates!!!

2000-11-02 Thread David Weinehall
adlines on that page... /David _ _ // David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> /> Northern lights wander \\ // Project MCA Linux hacker// Dance across the winter sky // \> http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: scsi init problem in 2.4.0-test10? [PATCH]

2000-11-02 Thread David Weinehall
ed some SCSI-adapters to hang on scsi-scan?! If so, what's better: to follow the specs and penalise the bad guys, or ignore the specs and penalise the good guys... /David Weinehall _ _ // David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> /

Re: working userspace nfs v3 for linux?

2000-11-01 Thread David Weinehall
han Solaris 7 and the Solstice Disk Suite, > which performs like crap thanks to UFS, and the Linux NFS v2 > implementation. Yes, but why do you need a userspace NFSv3 server? v2.2.18 will contain knfsdv3, shouldn't this be

Re: 2.2.18Pre Lan Performance Rocks!

2000-10-31 Thread David Weinehall
llisions. You mean like: TUX 1.0 1x667MHz Pentium-IIIEB 1270 SpecWeb99 TUX 1.0 2x800MHz Pentium-III-Xeon 2200 SpecWeb99 TUX 1.0 4x700MHz Pentium-III-Xeon 4200 SpecWeb99 (Check out quarter 2 instead of q3) Truly impressive figures imho. /David Weinehall _

Re: kernel BUG at fs.c:567

2000-10-29 Thread David Weinehall
filesystems trashed. /David _ _ // David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> /> Northern lights wander \\ // Project MCA Linux hacker// Dance across the winter sky // \> http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: 2.4.0-test9 + LFS

2000-10-27 Thread David Weinehall
ek or so Then it's compiled against the v2.2 kernel headers. /David _ _ // David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> /> Northern lights wander \\ // Project MCA Linux hacker// Dance across the winter sky //

Re: Off-Topic (or maybe on-topic)

2000-10-27 Thread David Weinehall
On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 02:24:53PM +0100, Tigran Aivazian wrote: > On Fri, 27 Oct 2000, David Weinehall wrote: > > and 1924 the city got renamed again, this time to Leningrad. > > ok, then a quiz question - was it renamed before or after Lenin's death? > (hint, Lenin di

Re: Off-Topic (or maybe on-topic)

2000-10-27 Thread David Weinehall
On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 04:05:50PM +0300, Petko Manolov wrote: > David Weinehall wrote: > > > > You're VERY wrong here. St. Petersburg was the name before the Soviet > > Union was formed and Russia marched into the Baltics. When the takeover > > was made, the c

Re: Off-Topic (or maybe on-topic)

2000-10-27 Thread David Weinehall
enin). When the Soviet Union finally fell to pieces and the Baltics retained their freedom, St. Petersburg retained its old name, which it got (if I'm not all wrong) from Peter the Great. /David _ _ // David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> /> Northern lights wander \\ // Project MCA Linux hacker// Dance across the winter sky // \> http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: [Criticism] On the discussion about C++ modules

2000-10-24 Thread David Weinehall
object output. Oh, and why should *I* have to write any conversion-routines and glue code? Of course, someone else should rewrite the kernel to suit my needs... > (I still have my 30-year-old PL/I documentation from my mainframe days, > including the compiler program logic manual.)

Re: make -j 2 broken?

2000-10-23 Thread David Weinehall
get any unpleasant surprises: make -j 20 dep && make -j 20 bzImage modules && make modules_install /David _ _ // David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> /> Northern lights wander \\ // Project MCA Linux hacker// Dance across the winter sky // \> http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: [Criticism] On the discussion about C++ modules

2000-10-22 Thread David Weinehall
from participating, then I'm pretty confident that the merits of a C++ kernel would pretty fast become obvious. Devote one of your servers to be a CVS-server for the C++ kernelbranch and let people hack away. For every single kernelrelease you then release a patch-set that co

Re: test10-pre3

2000-10-17 Thread David Weinehall
modelcode 0x0111... Then again, we all know that Intel has made processors in the past that couldn't count, so I guess it's possible that they screwed up this time too :^) /David _ _ // David Weinehall

Re: VM: do_try_to_free_memory failed for XXXX, 2.2.17, 2.2.18pre3

2000-10-13 Thread David Weinehall
s to NFS, and it's time to prove to people that we don't suck as much as they believe... :^) /David Weinehall _ _ // David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> /> Northern lights wander \\ // Projec

Re: When do release linux-2.0.39

2000-10-09 Thread David Weinehall
ver, if I can't resolve those within a reasonable time, I'll release v2.0.39. /David _ _ // David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> /> Northern lights wander \\ // Project MCA Linux hacker/

Re: (OT -- Partition Magic for Linux?) Re: Newer motherboards / CPU's / hardware with Linux

2000-10-09 Thread David Weinehall
AT 12/16/32) Linux ext2 Linux swap partitions versions 0 and 1 (Linux >= v2.2.X) OS/2 HPFS Windows NTFS *BSD disklabels Solaris/x86 disklabels Minix FS Reiser FS LVM physical volumes .

Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler

2000-10-06 Thread David Weinehall
On Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 11:27:18PM +0200, David Weinehall wrote: > On Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 04:19:55PM -0400, Byron Stanoszek wrote: > > On Fri, 6 Oct 2000, Rik van Riel wrote: > > > > > 3. add the out of memory killer, which has been tuned with > > >-tes

Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler

2000-10-06 Thread David Weinehall
ang angry... Standing ovations for Rik van Riel. You've managed to get the VM in good shape, at least for my machine... Now I'll test it for some machines with less and more memory (4MB and 64MB ram, with 16MB swap and 0/256/512/1024/2048 MB swap respectively.) /David _

Re: v2.4.0test9 NFSv3 server woes Linux-->Solaris

2000-10-06 Thread David Weinehall
On Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 02:08:27PM +0200, Trond Myklebust wrote: > >>>>> " " == David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> 2.4.0-pre9 should default to rsize/wsize == whatever Solaris > >> asks for (32k in practice). It does

Re: v2.4.0test9 NFSv3 server woes Linux-->Solaris

2000-10-05 Thread David Weinehall
On Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 09:27:56PM +0200, Trond Myklebust wrote: > >>>>> " " == David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Oh, by the way, is there ANY sane reason whatsoever behind the > > decision that the Linux NFSv3 clien

Re: v2.4.0test9 NFSv3 server woes Linux-->Solaris

2000-10-05 Thread David Weinehall
On Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 11:38:26AM -0400, Bill Rugolsky Jr. wrote: > On Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 04:58:39PM +0200, David Weinehall wrote: > > Using the NFSv3 server in the v2.4.0test9 kernel (I haven't tested any > > earlier v2.3.xx or v2.4.0testx kernels) I'm having proble

v2.4.0test9 NFSv3 server woes Linux-->Solaris

2000-10-05 Thread David Weinehall
3 defaults to 32kB... At least when mounting Solaris NFSv3 server --> Linux NFSv3 client, 32kB rsize & wsize works perfectly fine (at least for v2.2.18pre15, but I hope that v2.4.0test9 isn't worse in this regard.) /David _

Re: VM in v2.4.0test9

2000-10-04 Thread David Weinehall
will still kill processes which catch DANGER if REALLY needed, but it will start with those that does not catch DANGER.) /David _ _ // David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> /> Northern lights wander \\ // Project MCA Linux

Re: Proposing patches for Linux 2.2.1[89] ...

2000-10-04 Thread David Weinehall
.. > > Great work, thank you all a lot! > > Having fun with linux ... Don't we all?! :^) /David Weinehall _ _ // David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> /> Northern lights wander \\ // Project MCA Linux hacker// Dance across the winter sky // \> http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: VM in v2.4.0test9

2000-10-04 Thread David Weinehall
On Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 01:01:21PM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote: > On Wed, 4 Oct 2000, David Weinehall wrote: > > > Running the included program on a clean v2.4.0test9 kernel I can > > hang the computer practically in no time. > > > What seems most strange is that the

Re: VM in v2.4.0test9

2000-10-04 Thread David Weinehall
On Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 12:31:13PM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote: > On Wed, 4 Oct 2000, David Weinehall wrote: > > > Running the included program on a clean v2.4.0test9 kernel I can > > hang the computer practically in no time. The only other > > [OUT OF MEMORY

VM in v2.4.0test9

2000-10-04 Thread David Weinehall
ges shared 48 pages swap cached 0 pagetable cache Buffermem: 112 kB I hope this can be of some help. /David _ _ // David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> /> Northern lights wander \\ // Project MCA Linux hacker/

Re: Alan, are you out there?!

2000-10-02 Thread David Weinehall
Oct 02 12:50 dfe92Aogi17072 -rw--- 1 root system 1266 Oct 02 16:36 qfe92Aogi17072 /David _ _ // David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> /> Northern lights wander \\ // Project MCA Linux hacker// Dance across the winter sky // \> http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: 2.4.0-test9-pre8

2000-10-02 Thread David Weinehall
On Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 10:26:20AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > On Mon, 2 Oct 2000, David Weinehall wrote: > > > Warnings on build with v2.4.0test9pre8 (with Rik van Riel's extra fixes): > > > > parport_pc.c:2283: warning: `parport_pc_superio_info' defined but

Re: 2.4.0-test9-pre8

2000-10-02 Thread David Weinehall
Warning: indirect lcall without `*' bsetup.s: Assembler messages: bsetup.s:1126: Warning: indirect lcall without `*' The parport thing is because I don't use PCI, I suppose, and fixes for the sg.c and buffer.c warnings are attached. I won't go anywhere near the fpu emula

Re: 2.4.0-test9-pre8

2000-10-02 Thread David Weinehall
oc.c:536: warning: int format, long int arg (arg 2) (I HATE buildtime warnings.) /David _ _ // David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> /> Northern lights wander \\ // Project MCA Linux hacker// Dance across the winter sky // \> http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: Alan, are you out there?!

2000-10-02 Thread David Weinehall
g.swansea.uk.linux.org.) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> There were also some notes about read errors etc. /David _ _ // David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> /> Northern lights wander \\ // Project MCA Linux hacker// Da

Alan, are you out there?!

2000-10-02 Thread David Weinehall
ing... /David _ _ // David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> /> Northern lights wander \\ // Project MCA Linux hacker// Dance across the winter sky // \> http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: 32-bit pid_t / security

2000-10-02 Thread David Weinehall
On Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 04:16:44AM +0200, Andries Brouwer wrote: > On Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 07:51:13PM +0200, David Weinehall wrote: > > > Hoping for security just by having more > > PID's is a bit naive. > > *1* > It is strange that people do not really seem t

Re: PIDs limited to 15 significant bits

2000-10-01 Thread David Weinehall
exploit the wraparound, you'd probably notice. > So the 31-bit space won't help you much. If you really want > this kind of security, you should make me an offer for my old PC. > I'll even pop out the OverDrive, getting you down to 25 MHz. Uhmmm. Of course, DOS attacks versus such a machine isn't very complicated anyway... /David _ _ // David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> /> Northern lights wander \\ // Project MCA Linux hacker// Dance across the winter sky // \> http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2

2000-09-19 Thread David Weinehall
pretty non-critical to change, as it's a new platform anyway, and the userbase is probably not that large yet (hopefully it will become!) As for me, I'm content as long as MCA-support and MPC7400 support works properly for respectively x86 and PPC... /David Weinehall _

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] pre-patch-2.0.39final

2000-09-15 Thread David Weinehall
it only works once or twice, then the people who don't experience bugs and want the proper final version get fed up. /David _ _ // David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> /> Northern lights wander \\ // Project

[ANNOUNCEMENT] pre-patch-2.0.39final

2000-09-15 Thread David Weinehall
Update Documentation/Changes(me) to mirror the needed binutils version /David _ _ // David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> /> Northern lights wander \\ // Project MCA Linux hacker// Dance across the winter sky // \> http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: [patch] Name-clash between paride & hamradio

2000-09-11 Thread David Weinehall
mascc.c anyway. > I believe we can remove those two -- any objections? Well, I won't remove them from the v2.0-tree, and I don't know about v2.2, but from v2.4 that seems like a sane decision. /David _ _ // Davi

Re: [patch] Name-clash between paride & hamradio

2000-09-09 Thread David Weinehall
gt; This problem has been fixed in the 2.2 tree a long time ago. Hmmm. Maybe then we should try to use the same solution in all 3 trees, to avoid confusion... I guess I'll have to download a v2.2 tarball and have a look. /David _

Re: [patch] Name-clash between paride & hamradio

2000-09-08 Thread David Weinehall
On Fri, 8 Sep 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > On Sat, 9 Sep 2000, David Weinehall wrote: > > > > This patches changes the names of the init-functions for the > > hamradio-drivers pt.c and pi2.c. None of the new names are used anywhere > > else in the kerne

[patch] Name-clash between paride & hamradio

2000-09-08 Thread David Weinehall
? /David _ _ // David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> /> Northern lights wander \\ // Project MCA Linux hacker// Dance across the winter sky // \> http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Announcement] pre-patch-2.0.39-8

2000-09-07 Thread David Weinehall
rsion /David _ _ // David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> /> Northern lights wander \\ // Project MCA Linux hacker// Dance across the winter sky // \> http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: [Announcement] pre-patch-2.0.39-7

2000-09-02 Thread David Weinehall
On Sat, 2 Sep 2000, David Weinehall wrote: > This is probably the last 2.0.39 pre-patch, unless someone comes up > with something horrible. Still, I'm not impossible to convince, > should there be something one of you out the consider pressing. > Test and enjoy! > > >

[Announcement] pre-patch-2.0.39-7

2000-09-02 Thread David Weinehall
tes to CREDITS(me) o Update Documentation/Changes(me) to mirror the needed binutils version /David _ _ // David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> /> Northern lights wander \\ // P

Linux-kernel v2.0.39pre7 w/ huge databases

2000-09-02 Thread David Weinehall
ww.acc.umu.se/~tao/linux/ /David Weinehall, maintainer for the v2.0.xx kernel-series _ _ // David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> /> Northern lights wander \\ // Project MCA Linux hacker// Dance across

<    1   2