I have a proposition for you it will be a mutual benefit to both of us

-- Dear Sir, I am David Williams. I have a Proposition involving an investment initiative in your Country to discuss with you, It will be of mutual benefit to both of us, and I believe we can handle it together, once we have a common understanding and mutual co-operation in the execution of the

dringender Kredit

-- Benötigen Sie dringend einen Kredit? Wenn ja, antworten Sie für weitere Details

CONFIDENTIAL TRUST REPLY .

will be highly appreciated Best regards, Mr. David Williams -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://w

CONFID ENTIAL TRUST REPLY .

executed and your urgent response to this proposal will be highly appreciated.   Best regards, Mr. David Williams -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org

Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3

On 6/17/07, Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Everybody else just cares about the legal reasons. > The "legal terms" is the only reason a license *exists*. That's what a > license *is*, for crying out loud! > If you don't care about the legal side, go and read the free software > man

Re: GPLv3 dispute solution - new open source license?

On 6/18/07, Carlo Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Now, writing yet another license for the linux kernel is > therefore NOT the solution - if you get my drift. The new license could be written to be compatible with both versions of the GPL. IMO, a new license written from the OSS perspective

Re: GPLv3 dispute solution - new open source license?

On 6/18/07, H. Peter Anvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You probably don't want do design a license without involving a > competent lawyer. We don't expect lawyers to write kernel code, either. True enough, and I realized this when I wrote my initial post, but it's not what I wrote so much as t

GPLv3 dispute solution - new open source license?

ld ethical freedoms, so we're sitting 90 degrees between the two extremes ;-) Open Source License Version 0.1, June 2007 Copyright (C) Joshua David Williams 2007. Everyone is permitted to distribute this document, but modification is strictly prohibited. Preamble In contrast to the GNU