Davide Libenzi wrote:
There is no known problem in using epoll_ctl() in one thread while
another does epoll_wait().
I suggest you to ask Valgrind to take a look at you binary. Since I
have no clue of what your software does, please create the *minimal*
code snippet that exploit the eventual
Jari Sundell wrote:
On 8/23/05, Davy Durham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I was hoping you would mention in your reply that you knew
epoll_data_t was an union and you didn't touch epoll_data::fd, so i
wouldn't have to say it explicitly. ;)
Oh!.. unless the epoll_data_t is
Jari Sundell wrote:
On 8/23/05, Davy Durham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I was hoping you would mention in your reply that you knew
epoll_data_t was an union and you didn't touch epoll_data::fd, so i
wouldn't have to say it explicitly. ;)
No, I saw that epoll_data_t was a
Davide Libenzi wrote:
I should mention that the 2.4 patch is old WRT mainline epoll in 2.6
(I stopped maintaining it when 2.6 went "stable"). I'd definitely
suggest to use 2.6 if you are looking at epoll.
I am using linux-2.6.11 and glibc-2.3.4 .. and using select() in it's
place seems to
Thanks for the info.. I did find this thread and was wondering if this
patch ever got put in
http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0303.3/1139.html
Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 06:24:42AM -0500, Davy Durham wrote:
That's probably a good idea. Where would I
Jari Sundell wrote:
On 8/23/05, Davy Durham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
However, I'm getting segfaults because some pointers in places are
getting set to low integer values (which didn't used to have those values).
Is it possible that you are overwritting the po
That's probably a good idea. Where would I find out what other projects
use it?
Willy Tarreau wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 06:01:15AM -0500, Davy Durham wrote:
I just mean that when I debug and catch the segv, it's dies because
some pointers now have corrupted values.
Davy Durham wrote:
I'm currently re-writing some code to make it use select() instead of
epoll_wait() and see if everything is suddently fixed. If so, then I
will suspect that epoll has a problem. But it's still not ruled out
being my fault since it could be a timing issue that
bert hubert wrote:
On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 04:49:14AM -0500, Davy Durham wrote:
However, I'm getting segfaults because some pointers in places are
getting set to low integer values (which didn't used to have those values).
epoll is pretty heavily benchmarked and hence
so new.
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Davy
bert hubert wrote:
On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 04:18:46PM -0500, Davy Durham wrote:
Please forgive and redirect me if this is not the right place to ask
this question:
I'm looking to write a sort of messaging system that would take input
from any number
Jan Engelhardt wrote:
I have a zombie process which has apparently died for some unknown reason.. I
know it was terminated by a signal (found that from the 9th field (sheduler
flags) in /proc/pid/stat)
Start the process under the observation of strace.
However, I'm trying to figure o
After much research.. I have a question regarding /proc
I have a zombie process which has apparently died for some unknown
reason.. I know it was terminated by a signal (found that from the 9th
field (sheduler flags) in /proc/pid/stat)
However, I'm trying to figure out what signal killed it.
Please forgive and redirect me if this is not the right place to ask
this question:
I'm looking to write a sort of messaging system that would take input
from any number of entities that "register" with it.. it would then
route the messages to outputs and so forth..
I'm guessing that the mes
Hi,
I've been trying for the last few days to get my D810 to suspend and
resume in linux.
I'm doing it from klaptop in kde using Fedora Core 3, but I've now
compiled my own linux-2.6.12-rc2-mm3 kernel since I've seen some ACPI
changes going in.
At 2.6.11 it would seem to suspend ok, but when
Hi,
I've been trying for the last few days to get my D810 to suspend and
resume in linux.
I'm doing it from klaptop in kde using Fedora Core 3, but I've now
compiled my own linux-2.6.12-rc2-mm3 kernel since I've seen some ACPI
changes going in.
At 2.6.11 it would seem to suspend ok, but when
15 matches
Mail list logo
