diffstat is small and we all
> want someone to pull it in and get it into mainline. This would serve
> many people if this can get pulled in upstream.
>
> More below:
>
> On Tue, 22 Dec 2015, Denis Bychkov wrote:
>> There is a set of bcache stability patches elevating bcache sta
or production bcache use. The diffstat is small and we all
> want someone to pull it in and get it into mainline. This would serve
> many people if this can get pulled in upstream.
>
> More below:
>
> On Tue, 22 Dec 2015, Denis Bychkov wrote:
>> There is a set of bca
;, buf);
- if (atomic_xchg(>running, 1))
+ if (atomic_xchg(>running, 1)) {
+ kfree(env[1]);
+ kfree(env[2]);
return;
+ }
if (!d->c &&
BDEV_STATE(>sb) != BDEV_STATE_NONE) {
From: Denis Bychkov
Allows to use register, not register_quiet in udev to avoid "device_busy&q
er.c
+++ b/drivers/md/bcache/super.c
@@ -847,8 +847,11 @@ void bch_cached_dev_run(struct cached_de
buf[SB_LABEL_SIZE] = '\0';
env[2] = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "CACHED_LABEL=%s", buf);
- if (atomic_xchg(>running, 1))
+ if (atomic_xchg(>running, 1)) {
+ kfree(env[1]);
+ kfree(env[2])
The only started in 4.3 kernel (at least RC-5), 4.2.x does not have
this problem. The kernel panic happens immediately after the SDHC card
is inserted, reproducibility is 100%. If the system boots up with the
card already inserted, it will crash as soon as sdhci_pci module is
loaded. If the module
The only started in 4.3 kernel (at least RC-5), 4.2.x does not have
this problem. The kernel panic happens immediately after the SDHC card
is inserted, reproducibility is 100%. If the system boots up with the
card already inserted, it will crash as soon as sdhci_pci module is
loaded. If the module
Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 11:30:17AM -0400, Denis Bychkov wrote:
>> > Well, it turns out my celebration was a bit premature.
>> >
>> > PLEASE, DO NOT APPLY THE PATCH POSTED BY KENT (not the one Vojtech
>> > posted) ON A PRODUCTION SYSTEM, IT CAUSES DAT
800, Kent Overstreet wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 11:30:17AM -0400, Denis Bychkov wrote:
>> > Well, it turns out my celebration was a bit premature.
>> >
>> > PLEASE, DO NOT APPLY THE PATCH POSTED BY KENT (not the one Vojtech
>> > posted
, 2015 at 2:31 PM, Kent Overstreet
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 08:40:54AM -0800, Kent Overstreet wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 11:30:17AM -0400, Denis Bychkov wrote:
>> > Well, it turns out my celebration was a bit premature.
>> >
>> > PLEASE, D
, Sep 16, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Denis Bychkov wrote:
> Hi Kent, Vojtech, list
>
> Your fix works perfectly, I can finally remove my patch that disables
> the partial_stripes_expensive branch and unleash the full bcache
> performance on my RAID-6 array. I was aware of this problem for
, Sep 16, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Denis Bychkov <mano...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Kent, Vojtech, list
>
> Your fix works perfectly, I can finally remove my patch that disables
> the partial_stripes_expensive branch and unleash the full bcache
> performance on my RAID-6 array. I was
, 2015 at 2:31 PM, Kent Overstreet
<kent.overstr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 08:40:54AM -0800, Kent Overstreet wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 11:30:17AM -0400, Denis Bychkov wrote:
>> > Well, it turns out my celebration was a bit premature.
>&g
Hi Kent, Vojtech, list
Your fix works perfectly, I can finally remove my patch that disables
the partial_stripes_expensive branch and unleash the full bcache
performance on my RAID-6 array. I was aware of this problem for some
time now, but never got to learning the bcache codebase enough to find
Hi Kent, Vojtech, list
Your fix works perfectly, I can finally remove my patch that disables
the partial_stripes_expensive branch and unleash the full bcache
performance on my RAID-6 array. I was aware of this problem for some
time now, but never got to learning the bcache codebase enough to find
14 matches
Mail list logo
