Re: tsc timer related problems/questions

2007-09-11 Thread Dennis Lubert
Also thanks to all the others for their reply! Am Montag, den 10.09.2007, 19:19 -0600 schrieb Robert Hancock: > Dennis Lubert wrote: > > Hello list, > > [105771.581838] [] start_secondary+0x474/0x483 > > > > Question: Is this a known bug already or should further i

Re: tsc timer related problems/questions

2007-09-11 Thread Dennis Lubert
Also thanks to all the others for their reply! Am Montag, den 10.09.2007, 19:19 -0600 schrieb Robert Hancock: Dennis Lubert wrote: Hello list, [105771.581838] [806bc5f7] start_secondary+0x474/0x483 Question: Is this a known bug already or should further investigation take

tsc timer related problems/questions

2007-09-09 Thread Dennis Lubert
Hello list, we are encountering a few behaviours regarding the ways to get accurate timer values under Linux that we would call bugs, and where we are currently stuck in further diagnosing and/or fixing. Background: We are developing for SMP servers with up to 8 CPUs (mostly AMD64) and for

tsc timer related problems/questions

2007-09-09 Thread Dennis Lubert
Hello list, we are encountering a few behaviours regarding the ways to get accurate timer values under Linux that we would call bugs, and where we are currently stuck in further diagnosing and/or fixing. Background: We are developing for SMP servers with up to 8 CPUs (mostly AMD64) and for