On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 02:11:04pm -0700, R. Parameswaran wrote:
>
[snip]
> @@ -206,6 +209,46 @@ static void l2tp_eth_show(struct seq_file *m, void
> *arg)
> }
> #endif
[snip]
> +
> static int l2tp_eth_create(struct net *net, u32 tunnel_id, u32 session_id,
> u32 peer_session_id, struct
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 02:11:04pm -0700, R. Parameswaran wrote:
>
[snip]
> @@ -206,6 +209,46 @@ static void l2tp_eth_show(struct seq_file *m, void
> *arg)
> }
> #endif
[snip]
> +
> static int l2tp_eth_create(struct net *net, u32 tunnel_id, u32 session_id,
> u32 peer_session_id, struct
On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 07:18:47PM -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> > I ran firefox setuid to a different (not my main user), uid+gid, gave
> > my main account that gid as a supplemental group, and gave that uid
> > access to the X magic cookie.
>
> You need to use runxas to get any kind of real
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 01:12:46AM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
>
> The value of SELinux (or indeed any system compartmentalising access and
> limiting damage) comes into play when you get breakage - eg via a web
> browser exploit.
well, being sick of the number of times one has to upgrade the
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 01:12:46AM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
The value of SELinux (or indeed any system compartmentalising access and
limiting damage) comes into play when you get breakage - eg via a web
browser exploit.
well, being sick of the number of times one has to upgrade the browser
On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 07:18:47PM -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
I ran firefox setuid to a different (not my main user), uid+gid, gave
my main account that gid as a supplemental group, and gave that uid
access to the X magic cookie.
You need to use runxas to get any kind of real security.
On Wed, Mar 07, 2001 at 09:36:32PM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 07 2001, Pozsar Balazs wrote:
> > Details: (dmesg)
> >
> > When I run "dvdinfo /dev/hdd" I get:
> > Disc is encrypted.
> > Layer 0[3]
> > Num Layers: 2
> > Start Sector0xd000
> > End Sector 0xd000
> > End
On Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 04:35:43AM -0600, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
>
> IPX is a really good LAN protocol (but totally sucks for internet). A
> full blown NCP server in-kernel that's toughtly coupled to the page
> cache running over IPX would make flames shoot out of the back of a
> Linux server,
8 matches
Mail list logo
