Hi Mikael/All,
--- Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> Anyway, I can think of two things:
>
> 1. There was some very recent patches by Peter
> Zijlstra
>addressing hrtimer breakage on arm and some other
>archs in 2.6.24-git. If uclinux has backported
> some
>of that stuff then it might
Hi Mikael/All,
--- Mikael Pettersson wrote:
Anyway, I can think of two things:
1. There was some very recent patches by Peter
Zijlstra
addressing hrtimer breakage on arm and some other
archs in 2.6.24-git. If uclinux has backported
some
of that stuff then it might explain this
Hi Mikael,
--- Mikael Pettersson wrote:
>
> Is this a new ixp4xx platform or one of the existing
> ones in arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx?
>
The machine type (arch/arm/tools/mach-types) is
ct_dfs. However, the platform is a copy of the coyote
platform in arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx.
> Anyway, I can think
Hi Mikael,
--- Mikael Pettersson wrote:
Is this a new ixp4xx platform or one of the existing
ones in arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx?
The machine type (arch/arm/tools/mach-types) is
ct_dfs. However, the platform is a copy of the coyote
platform in arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx.
Anyway, I can think of
Hi All,
I am observing kernel soft lockups when running
network throughput tests with NUTTCP. The kernel is a
stock 2.6.23 kernel with patches from uClinux.org. I
have applied the incremental 2.6.23 patches to produce
the resulting 2.6.23.14-uc0 kernel. This kernel is
executing on a 266MHz
Hi All,
I am observing kernel soft lockups when running
network throughput tests with NUTTCP. The kernel is a
stock 2.6.23 kernel with patches from uClinux.org. I
have applied the incremental 2.6.23 patches to produce
the resulting 2.6.23.14-uc0 kernel. This kernel is
executing on a 266MHz
6 matches
Mail list logo