This note is sort of a half question half bug report. I ran into a
problem with VMware, though it isn't really an issue with VMware -- I
was creating what it terms a "plain disk", and part of that process has
it trying to seek to the end of a disk partition and verifying it is
really the size it
This note is sort of a half question half bug report. I ran into a
problem with VMware, though it isn't really an issue with VMware -- I
was creating what it terms a "plain disk", and part of that process has
it trying to seek to the end of a disk partition and verifying it is
really the size it
"Richard B. Johnson" wrote:
>
>I think it's a math problem in the test code. Try this:
>
[code deleted]
>
>Note that two subsequent calls to gettimeofday() must not return the
>same time even if your CPU runs infinitely fast. I haven't seen any
>kernel in the past few years that fails this
"Richard B. Johnson" wrote:
I think it's a math problem in the test code. Try this:
[code deleted]
Note that two subsequent calls to gettimeofday() must not return the
same time even if your CPU runs infinitely fast. I haven't seen any
kernel in the past few years that fails this test.
I
Morten,
I'm not subscribed to linux-kernel, but I've been following the list archive
somewhat for the past month (watching 2.4 development so I can figure out
when it is safe to make the jump without too much hassle)
I just bought a Dell Inspiron 4000 laptop a month ago, and have the same
Morten,
I'm not subscribed to linux-kernel, but I've been following the list archive
somewhat for the past month (watching 2.4 development so I can figure out
when it is safe to make the jump without too much hassle)
I just bought a Dell Inspiron 4000 laptop a month ago, and have the same
6 matches
Mail list logo
