platform which makes
use of the i2c bus multiplexing API.
i2c-dev busses with device minor numbers larger than 256 have also been
validated to work with the existing i2c-tools.
Signed-off-by: Erico Nunes
---
drivers/i2c/i2c-dev.c | 19 +++
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 4 deletions
the Xilinx MicroBlaze Processor Reference
Guides UG081 (v14.7) and UG984 (v2014.1).
Signed-off-by: Erico Nunes
---
arch/microblaze/kernel/cpu/cpuinfo.c | 4
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/microblaze/kernel/cpu/cpuinfo.c
b/arch/microblaze/kernel/cpu/cpuinfo.c
index 234aca
On 11/13/2014 06:52 AM, Stanimir Varbanov wrote:
> Hi Grant, Arnd and Erico
>
> On 11/11/2014 01:07 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
>> On Fri, 07 Nov 2014 18:04:35 +0100
>> , Arnd Bergmann
>> wrote:
>>> On Friday 07 November 2014 14:37:26 DATACOM - Érico Nunes wrote:
Hello Arnd and all,
>>>
2014-03-11 1:31 GMT-03:00 Erico Nunes :
> Mention to CONFIG_MTD_ECC_BCH in the warning message can be confusing as this
> doesn't match the exact name of the configuration option.
> This warning showed up once to me when I was starting to set up BCH. After
> checking my .confi
it is
CONFIG_MTD_NAND_ECC_BCH instead of CONFIG_MTD_ECC_BCH.
Signed-off-by: Erico Nunes
---
drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
index 9715a7b..5a93787 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 12:15 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-11-17 at 21:07 -0500, Greg Price wrote:
>
> Maybe, but this case isn't a macro. It's a function.
> Dunno if differentiating when it's a macro or a
> function is difficult though.
>
>
The case which was initially reported by spar
list
Signed-off-by: Erico Nunes
---
fs/jffs2/super.c | 17 +
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/jffs2/super.c b/fs/jffs2/super.c
index 0defb1c..ec9e16f 100644
--- a/fs/jffs2/super.c
+++ b/fs/jffs2/super.c
@@ -361,6 +361,14 @@ MODULE_ALIAS_FS("
Thanks for your reply.
I'll resubmit shortly.
Do you mean it as an error in the sparse tool?
I don't think so, I took a look and it seems to be designed to output
an error for that case.
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 7:40 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-11-17 at 18:18 -0200, Eric
This patch fixes the following errors reported when running sparse:
fs/jffs2/super.c:378:1: error: directive in argument list
fs/jffs2/super.c:380:1: error: directive in argument list
fs/jffs2/super.c:381:1: error: directive in argument list
fs/jffs2/super.c:383:1: error: directive in argument list
9 matches
Mail list logo