Hi,
I updated my old Sony Vaio a few days ago and discovered that a few Fn-keys on
my old Sony Vaio had stopped working.
The bisection points at the commit in the subject and reverting it makes
everything work again even with current
Linus' git.
Full bug report below. Please CC: me as I'm not
Hi.
On Dec 8, 2007 3:40 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.23 which have been
> reported since 2.6.24-rc1 was released and for which there are no fixes in the
> mainline that I know of. If any of them have been fixed
Hi.
On Dec 8, 2007 3:40 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.23 which have been
reported since 2.6.24-rc1 was released and for which there are no fixes in the
mainline that I know of. If any of them have been fixed already,
Hi
On Nov 21, 2007 11:39 AM, Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> * Fabio Comolli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > To answer your latest mail, again I don't have numbers but from my
> > point ov view:
> >
> > 23.1 < 23.1+ck < 23.8+cfs.24
&g
Hi
On Nov 20, 2007 10:53 PM, Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > curious: what scheduler/kernel version have you used before?
> >
> > I was using 2.6.23.1 with ck patches.
>
> are you sure? The last -ck patch i can find is for .22:
>
>
Hi
On Nov 20, 2007 10:53 PM, Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
curious: what scheduler/kernel version have you used before?
I was using 2.6.23.1 with ck patches.
are you sure? The last -ck patch i can find is for .22:
Hi
On Nov 21, 2007 11:39 AM, Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Fabio Comolli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To answer your latest mail, again I don't have numbers but from my
point ov view:
23.1 23.1+ck 23.8+cfs.24
where 23.1+ck is slightly better than vanilla 23.1 and 23.8+cfs.24
Hi
On Nov 20, 2007 9:41 PM, Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> * Fabio Comolli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi.
> > First, thanks for this patch. I don't have numbers but working with my
> > laptop feels much better.
>
> curious: what sche
Hi.
First, thanks for this patch. I don't have numbers but working with my
laptop feels much better.
Just a question: does the patch include the fix (divide by zero)
you just posted in the stable review for 2.6.23.9?
Thanks and regards,
Fabio
On Nov 19, 2007 4:17 PM, Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL
Hi.
First, thanks for this patch. I don't have numbers but working with my
laptop feels much better.
Just a question: does the patch include the fix (divide by zero)
you just posted in the stable review for 2.6.23.9?
Thanks and regards,
Fabio
On Nov 19, 2007 4:17 PM, Ingo Molnar [EMAIL
Hi
On Nov 20, 2007 9:41 PM, Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Fabio Comolli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi.
First, thanks for this patch. I don't have numbers but working with my
laptop feels much better.
curious: what scheduler/kernel version have you used before?
I was using
FWIW, I see the same problem with another HP notebook, DV4378EA with
radeon X700 video card. It does not happen frequently but I can say
that since I disabled the tickless feature I can't reproduce the
problem anymore.
On Nov 14, 2007 2:24 PM, Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > >
FWIW, I see the same problem with another HP notebook, DV4378EA with
radeon X700 video card. It does not happen frequently but I can say
that since I disabled the tickless feature I can't reproduce the
problem anymore.
On Nov 14, 2007 2:24 PM, Pavel Machek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Reproduced on a Intel Centrino based laptop with gentoo kamikaze7
sources (http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-577970.html)
On 8/25/07, David Rodriguez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm using 2.6.22.5 with cfs v20.3 and suspend2 2.2.10.2.
> With that combination, suspend is not working
Reproduced on a Intel Centrino based laptop with gentoo kamikaze7
sources (http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-577970.html)
On 8/25/07, David Rodriguez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm using 2.6.22.5 with cfs v20.3 and suspend2 2.2.10.2.
With that combination, suspend is not working anymore
Hi.
On 7/5/07, Gabriel C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Thu 2007-07-05 10:53:37, Paul Mackerras wrote:
>
>> Pavel Machek writes:
>>
>>
>>> 0. Get someone to sign up as a maintainer for suspend, so we have
>>> someone to blame for the mess? :-)
>>>
>> I thought that was
Hi.
On 7/5/07, Gabriel C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pavel Machek wrote:
On Thu 2007-07-05 10:53:37, Paul Mackerras wrote:
Pavel Machek writes:
0. Get someone to sign up as a maintainer for suspend, so we have
someone to blame for the mess? :-)
I thought that was Rafael?
Rafael is good
Hi
On 7/2/07, Alon Bar-Lev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/2/07, Fabio Comolli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On 7/2/07, Nigel Cunningham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi all.
> >
> > Suspend2's name is changing to "TuxOnIce&qu
Hi.
On 7/2/07, Nigel Cunningham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all.
Suspend2's name is changing to "TuxOnIce".
Am I the only person on this list thinking that a plain "hibernate"
will be a much better choice?
Regards,
Nigel
Just my 2 (euro)cents.
Best regards,
Fabio
-
To unsubscribe
Hi.
On 7/2/07, Nigel Cunningham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all.
Suspend2's name is changing to TuxOnIce.
Am I the only person on this list thinking that a plain hibernate
will be a much better choice?
Regards,
Nigel
Just my 2 (euro)cents.
Best regards,
Fabio
-
To unsubscribe from
Hi
On 7/2/07, Alon Bar-Lev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/2/07, Fabio Comolli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi.
On 7/2/07, Nigel Cunningham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all.
Suspend2's name is changing to TuxOnIce.
Am I the only person on this list thinking that a plain hibernate
Hi
On 6/6/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jun 2007 21:32:36 +0200 Mariusz Kozlowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This is from my P4 sony vaio laptop.
>
> These warnings still there:
>
> drivers/input/keyboard/Kconfig:170:warning: 'select' used by config
Hi
On 6/6/07, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jun 2007 21:32:36 +0200 Mariusz Kozlowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
This is from my P4 sony vaio laptop.
These warnings still there:
drivers/input/keyboard/Kconfig:170:warning: 'select' used by config symbol
Hi.
Block devices
Subject: loop devices limited to one single device
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/16/229
Submitter : Uwe Bugla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Handled-By : Ken Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/21/483
Status : patch available
I just
Hi.
Block devices
Subject: loop devices limited to one single device
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/16/229
Submitter : Uwe Bugla [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Handled-By : Ken Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/21/483
Status : patch available
I just
Oh, never mind. Of course it works.
I forgot to enable the framebuffer console, I thought that selecting a
fb driver would have automagically enabled it.
It breaks suspend-to-ram, but this is expected.
Thanks and sorry for the noise.
Fabio
On 5/19/07, Fabio Comolli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Regards,
Fabio
On 5/18/07, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 22:29 +0200, Fabio Comolli wrote:
> Is there a reason why this patch can't go upstream?
Yes. A change of that magnitude will most certainly introduce
regressions. So we can either
] wrote:
On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 22:29 +0200, Fabio Comolli wrote:
Is there a reason why this patch can't go upstream?
Yes. A change of that magnitude will most certainly introduce
regressions. So we can either:
- Have it in -mm for monthes trying to iron out all of them (and we'll
miss some
Oh, never mind. Of course it works.
I forgot to enable the framebuffer console, I thought that selecting a
fb driver would have automagically enabled it.
It breaks suspend-to-ram, but this is expected.
Thanks and sorry for the noise.
Fabio
On 5/19/07, Fabio Comolli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Hi.
On 5/17/07, Luca Tettamanti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Il Thu, May 17, 2007 at 11:59:23AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt ha scritto:
> On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 21:47 -0400, Daniel Drake wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Did anything happen to the patch titled "radeonfb: add support for newer
> > cards"?
>
Hi.
On 5/17/07, Luca Tettamanti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Il Thu, May 17, 2007 at 11:59:23AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt ha scritto:
On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 21:47 -0400, Daniel Drake wrote:
Hi,
Did anything happen to the patch titled radeonfb: add support for newer
cards?
Jan,
mine does not pop running Linux but only during the shutdown. As I
wrote before, switching from PATA to IDE has solved the problem for
me.
Regards,
Fabio
On 4/21/07, Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Apr 20 2007 21:57, Fabio Comolli wrote:
>
> hda: TOSHIBA
Hi.
On 4/21/07, emisca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So, removing -d halt option solves this problem?
According to the halt manpage, -n implies -d (in other words, -d is
not removed at all).
Regards,
Fabio
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of
Hi.
On 4/21/07, emisca [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, removing -d halt option solves this problem?
According to the halt manpage, -n implies -d (in other words, -d is
not removed at all).
Regards,
Fabio
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a
Jan,
mine does not pop running Linux but only during the shutdown. As I
wrote before, switching from PATA to IDE has solved the problem for
me.
Regards,
Fabio
On 4/21/07, Jan Engelhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 20 2007 21:57, Fabio Comolli wrote:
hda: TOSHIBA MK8025GAS, ATA DISK
Bingo!
I switched from ata_piix.c to piix_ide.c and the "pop" disappeared.
I must say that the "pop" also disappeared after suspending to disk
using suspend2 (obviously without executing halt -n -h -p) . In both
cases it was present with the previous setup.
This is with a pure PATA setup with
+1
On 4/20/07, Brad Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Alex Dubov wrote:
> Have you looked at the last version (0.8)? It fixed all outstanding issues
(as far as I know).
>
Seconded. I've been running Alex's latest driver since its release. I routinely
suspend/resume
60-100 times between
+1
On 4/20/07, Brad Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alex Dubov wrote:
Have you looked at the last version (0.8)? It fixed all outstanding issues
(as far as I know).
Seconded. I've been running Alex's latest driver since its release. I routinely
suspend/resume
60-100 times between boots
Bingo!
I switched from ata_piix.c to piix_ide.c and the pop disappeared.
I must say that the pop also disappeared after suspending to disk
using suspend2 (obviously without executing halt -n -h -p) . In both
cases it was present with the previous setup.
This is with a pure PATA setup with no
Hi.
On 4/17/07, Chuck Ebbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(2) Linux (alone) gives a very muted pop on shutdown. This could
be from bad interaction with the shutdown command, or some
other reason (drive not given enough time to shut down?)
The noise is not very loud, maybe the head
Hi.
On 4/17/07, Chuck Ebbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
(2) Linux (alone) gives a very muted pop on shutdown. This could
be from bad interaction with the shutdown command, or some
other reason (drive not given enough time to shut down?)
The noise is not very loud, maybe the head
sg04115.html
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8133
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8164
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/21/330
> Submitter : Fabio Comolli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Plamen Petrov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8133
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8164
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/21/330
Submitter : Fabio Comolli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Plamen Petrov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Laurent Riffard [EMAIL PROTECTED
l.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8133
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8164
> Submitter : Fabio Comolli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Plamen Petrov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Laurent Riffard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Handled-By : Tejun Heo
=8133
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8164
Submitter : Fabio Comolli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Plamen Petrov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Laurent Riffard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Handled-By : Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Status : patch available
Some cases should
Applied on top of latest GIT this patch make the warning[1] disappear.
Thanks,
Fabio
[1] ata2: reset failed, giving up
On 3/12/07, Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
->prereset() returns -ENOENT to tell libata that the port is empty and
reset sequencing should be stopped. This is not an
Applied on top of latest GIT this patch make the warning[1] disappear.
Thanks,
Fabio
[1] ata2: reset failed, giving up
On 3/12/07, Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-prereset() returns -ENOENT to tell libata that the port is empty and
reset sequencing should be stopped. This is not an error
Maybe KERN_DEBUG instead of KERN_ERR?
On 3/10/07, Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> scsi1 : ata_piix
> ata2: port disabled. ignoring.
> ata2: reset failed, giving up<--- THIS IS NEW.
>
> However, I think it's just bogus as there is ata2 is disabled on this laptop.
This is expected
Maybe KERN_DEBUG instead of KERN_ERR?
On 3/10/07, Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
scsi1 : ata_piix
ata2: port disabled. ignoring.
ata2: reset failed, giving up--- THIS IS NEW.
However, I think it's just bogus as there is ata2 is disabled on this laptop.
This is expected behaviour
Hi.
This update gives a new warning:
libata version 2.20 loaded.
ata_piix :00:1f.1: version 2.10ac1
ata1: PATA max UDMA/100 cmd 0x000101f0 ctl 0x000103f6 bmdma 0x000118c0 irq 14
ata2: PATA max UDMA/100 cmd 0x00010170 ctl 0x00010376 bmdma 0x000118c8 irq 15
scsi0 : ata_piix
ata1.00: ATA-6:
Hi.
This update gives a new warning:
libata version 2.20 loaded.
ata_piix :00:1f.1: version 2.10ac1
ata1: PATA max UDMA/100 cmd 0x000101f0 ctl 0x000103f6 bmdma 0x000118c0 irq 14
ata2: PATA max UDMA/100 cmd 0x00010170 ctl 0x00010376 bmdma 0x000118c8 irq 15
scsi0 : ata_piix
ata1.00: ATA-6:
07:25, Fabio Comolli wrote:
> Hi Con
> It would be nice if you could rebase this patch to latest git or at
> least to 2.6.21-rc3.
> Regards,
Check in http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/staircase-deadline/
There's an -rc3 patch there.
--
-ck
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
Hi Con
It would be nice if you could rebase this patch to latest git or at
least to 2.6.21-rc3.
Regards,
Fabio
On 3/4/07, Con Kolivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This message is to announce the first general public release of the "Rotating
Staircase DeadLine" cpu scheduler.
Based on previous
Hi Con
It would be nice if you could rebase this patch to latest git or at
least to 2.6.21-rc3.
Regards,
Fabio
On 3/4/07, Con Kolivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This message is to announce the first general public release of the Rotating
Staircase DeadLine cpu scheduler.
Based on previous
, Fabio Comolli wrote:
Hi Con
It would be nice if you could rebase this patch to latest git or at
least to 2.6.21-rc3.
Regards,
Check in http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/staircase-deadline/
There's an -rc3 patch there.
--
-ck
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel
On 2/16/07, Con Kolivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This patchset is designed to improve system responsiveness and interactivity.
It is configurable to any workload but the default -ck patch is aimed at the
desktop and -cks is available with more emphasis on serverspace.
Hi Con.
I usually don't
On 2/16/07, Con Kolivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This patchset is designed to improve system responsiveness and interactivity.
It is configurable to any workload but the default -ck patch is aimed at the
desktop and -cks is available with more emphasis on serverspace.
Hi Con.
I usually don't
Hi.
I see a regression in latest -git (2.6.20-g91aa6931). My PATA hard
disk is not correctly configured:
---
libata version 2.10 loaded.
ata_piix :00:1f.1: version 2.00ac7
ata1: PATA max UDMA/100 cmd 0x000101f0 ctl
Hi.
I see a regression in latest -git (2.6.20-g91aa6931). My PATA hard
disk is not correctly configured:
---
libata version 2.10 loaded.
ata_piix :00:1f.1: version 2.00ac7
ata1: PATA max UDMA/100 cmd 0x000101f0 ctl
Hi.
I can see this problem too. I have CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED set.
It happens only with SD cards, with MMC everything is OK.
Fabio
On 2/11/07, Brad Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Pierre Ossman wrote:
> Alex Dubov wrote:
>> One more problem (you may already know about it) - I was
Hi.
I can see this problem too. I have CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED set.
It happens only with SD cards, with MMC everything is OK.
Fabio
On 2/11/07, Brad Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pierre Ossman wrote:
Alex Dubov wrote:
One more problem (you may already know about it) - I was contacted by
Hi all.
I don't know if this report can be useful, but this problem does not
show up in my setup.
I tried multiple times to copy 10MB files (unmounting and remounting
every time) and verified with md5sum the results and everything is
correct.
Details:
* kernel version: 2.6.20-rc6-g93544047
*
Hi all.
I don't know if this report can be useful, but this problem does not
show up in my setup.
I tried multiple times to copy 10MB files (unmounting and remounting
every time) and verified with md5sum the results and everything is
correct.
Details:
* kernel version: 2.6.20-rc6-g93544047
*
Hi.
I just wanted to let you know that I tested the version found in
git-mmc.patch (from latest -mm kernel) with kernel version
2.6.20-rc3-g6a4306b3 (2 or 3 days ago Linus' GIT tree).
No problems so far: the driver seems pretty stable: it survived
various suspend-to-ram and suspend-to-disk
Hi.
I just wanted to let you know that I tested the version found in
git-mmc.patch (from latest -mm kernel) with kernel version
2.6.20-rc3-g6a4306b3 (2 or 3 days ago Linus' GIT tree).
No problems so far: the driver seems pretty stable: it survived
various suspend-to-ram and suspend-to-disk
Hi.
Can you confirm that the problem I mentioned in
http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/12/24/32 is the same?
Best regards,
Fabio
On 12/26/06, Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've had at least one more occurrence of it:
> >
> > [ 78.804940] BUG:
Hi
On 12/26/06, Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi!
> some days and will let you know if the problem represents. Please note
> that it happened only twice and I don't have any clue on how to
> reproduce it.
>
> I added Pavel and Rafael to CC-list because for the first time in at
>
Hi
On 12/26/06, Pavel Machek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
some days and will let you know if the problem represents. Please note
that it happened only twice and I don't have any clue on how to
reproduce it.
I added Pavel and Rafael to CC-list because for the first time in at
least six
Hi.
Can you confirm that the problem I mentioned in
http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/12/24/32 is the same?
Best regards,
Fabio
On 12/26/06, Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've had at least one more occurrence of it:
[ 78.804940] BUG:
six months my laptop failed to resume after suspend-to-disk
(userland tools) with this kernel. Guys, do you think that this
failure could be related to this BUG?
Best regards and Happy Holidays,
Fabio
On 12/24/06, OGAWA Hirofumi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Fabio Comolli" &
six months my laptop failed to resume after suspend-to-disk
(userland tools) with this kernel. Guys, do you think that this
failure could be related to this BUG?
Best regards and Happy Holidays,
Fabio
On 12/24/06, OGAWA Hirofumi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fabio Comolli [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
71 matches
Mail list logo
