schb Schönbauer Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
[r8169 driver for 2.4.x]
Against 2.4.31:
http://www.zoreil.com/~romieu/r8169/20050803-2.4.31-r8169-test.patch
--
Ueimor
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More
schb Schönbauer Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
[r8169 driver for 2.4.x]
Against 2.4.31:
http://www.zoreil.com/~romieu/r8169/20050803-2.4.31-r8169-test.patch
--
Ueimor
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo
apache <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
[...]
> Fact: I can write a DVD on a machine with kernel-2.6.11, but I cannot
> read that DVD in a machine with kernel-2.6.12, even worse: the system is
> stuck.
>
> please explain
I can't explain but we may try to fix it with your help.
As a general remark, dmesg
apache [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
[...]
Fact: I can write a DVD on a machine with kernel-2.6.11, but I cannot
read that DVD in a machine with kernel-2.6.12, even worse: the system is
stuck.
please explain
I can't explain but we may try to fix it with your help.
As a general remark, dmesg +
Pascal CHAPPERON <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
[...]
> By the way, i still can not force speed/mode/autoneg (ethtool or mii-tool);
> ethtool reports correctly the changes, but autoneg is not really disabled,
> and the driver falls back to 100 Full...
>
> Had Lars better results with autoneg off?
I
Pascal CHAPPERON <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
[...]
> sis190-120 compiles, loads but does not work (sis190_init_phy() function).
>
> # service network start
> Bringing up loopback interface:[ OK ]
> Bringing up interface eth0:
> Determining IP information for eth0...
Pascal CHAPPERON [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
[...]
sis190-120 compiles, loads but does not work (sis190_init_phy() function).
# service network start
Bringing up loopback interface:[ OK ]
Bringing up interface eth0:
Determining IP information for eth0... failed; no
Erior <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
[...]
> Is there any kind of test or information I can provid to help you fixing
> this ?
It could help to know if the device reports a link event interrupt or such.
(ethtool allow to modify the log level of the driver if required). Don't
hesitate to publish a complete
Erior <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
[...]
> Added PHY identifier for the Asus K8S-MX motherboard.
- is it ok to add a Signed-off-by: Lars Vahlenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ?
- how the whole driver work now ?
--
Ueimor
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of
Erior [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
[...]
Added PHY identifier for the Asus K8S-MX motherboard.
- is it ok to add a Signed-off-by: Lars Vahlenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] ?
- how the whole driver work now ?
--
Ueimor
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a
Erior [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
[...]
Is there any kind of test or information I can provid to help you fixing
this ?
It could help to know if the device reports a link event interrupt or such.
(ethtool allow to modify the log level of the driver if required). Don't
hesitate to publish a complete
Single file patch:
http://www.zoreil.com/~romieu/sis190/20050728-2.6.13-rc3-sis190-test.patch
Patch-kit:
http://www.zoreil.com/~romieu/sis190/20050728-2.6.13-rc3/patches
Tarball:
http://www.zoreil.com/~romieu/sis190/20050728-2.6.13-rc3.tar.bz2
Changes from previous version (20050722)
o Add
Single file patch:
http://www.zoreil.com/~romieu/sis190/20050728-2.6.13-rc3-sis190-test.patch
Patch-kit:
http://www.zoreil.com/~romieu/sis190/20050728-2.6.13-rc3/patches
Tarball:
http://www.zoreil.com/~romieu/sis190/20050728-2.6.13-rc3.tar.bz2
Changes from previous version (20050722)
o Add
[bouncing @sis.com address removed from the Cc:]
Lars Vahlenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
[...]
> I can get mii-tool to work with this patch, but if I have
> a ping command running and changing to another speed I
> stop receiving or get 1 - 3 sek pings. ei x000ms.
The current SiS driver is way more
[bouncing @sis.com address removed from the Cc:]
Lars Vahlenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
[...]
I can get mii-tool to work with this patch, but if I have
a ping command running and changing to another speed I
stop receiving or get 1 - 3 sek pings. ei x000ms.
The current SiS driver is way more
Daniel Higgins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
[napi for natsemi]
Can you please fill a bugzilla entry for it at bugzilla.kernel.org ?
--
Ueimor
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
Daniel Higgins [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
[napi for natsemi]
Can you please fill a bugzilla entry for it at bugzilla.kernel.org ?
--
Ueimor
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
No major change from previous version. I'm quietly merging bits from
the SiS driver that Lars kindly pointed out. The detection of the
mac address is done differently.
I'll welcome feedback related to regressions and/or netconsole testing.
Single file patch:
Lasse K??rkk??inen / Tronic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
> Is there a reason why this magnificient piece of software is not already
> in the mainline?
Yes, there is. Please search the archives.
--
Ueimor
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message
Lasse K??rkk??inen / Tronic [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
Is there a reason why this magnificient piece of software is not already
in the mainline?
Yes, there is. Please search the archives.
--
Ueimor
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to
No major change from previous version. I'm quietly merging bits from
the SiS driver that Lars kindly pointed out. The detection of the
mac address is done differently.
I'll welcome feedback related to regressions and/or netconsole testing.
Single file patch:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
[2.6.10 + e1000 + page allocation failure]
> Any ideas?
- upgrade
- increase vm.min_free_kbytes
- renice kswapd
- Cc: Nick Piggin and netdev@vger.kernel.org
--
Ueimor
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
[2.6.10 + e1000 + page allocation failure]
Any ideas?
- upgrade
- increase vm.min_free_kbytes
- renice kswapd
- Cc: Nick Piggin and netdev@vger.kernel.org
--
Ueimor
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a
dierbro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
[...]
> with a friend i have made this patch that add rlimit file to /proc/PID
> directory.
> Trought this file you can set and get rlimit of a running process.
I am not sure that new proc-functions will be welcome, anyway...
[...]
> ---
dierbro [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
[...]
with a friend i have made this patch that add rlimit file to /proc/PID
directory.
Trought this file you can set and get rlimit of a running process.
I am not sure that new proc-functions will be welcome, anyway...
[...]
--- linux-2.6.13-rc3/fs/proc/base.c
Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 07:10:14PM +0200, Francois Romieu wrote:
> > Adam Belay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
> > [...]
> >
> > Some nits + a suspect error branch. It seems nice otherwise.
>
> If I'm correct, this p
Adam Belay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
[...]
Some nits + a suspect error branch. It seems nice otherwise.
> --- a/drivers/pci/bus/bus.c 1969-12-31 19:00:00.0 -0500
> +++ b/drivers/pci/bus/bus.c 2005-07-10 22:32:53.0 -0400
[...]
> +struct pci_bus * pci_alloc_bus(void)
> +{
> +
Adam Belay [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
[...]
Some nits + a suspect error branch. It seems nice otherwise.
--- a/drivers/pci/bus/bus.c 1969-12-31 19:00:00.0 -0500
+++ b/drivers/pci/bus/bus.c 2005-07-10 22:32:53.0 -0400
[...]
+struct pci_bus * pci_alloc_bus(void)
+{
+ struct
Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 07:10:14PM +0200, Francois Romieu wrote:
Adam Belay [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
[...]
Some nits + a suspect error branch. It seems nice otherwise.
If I'm correct, this patch only moves the code into different files, it
doesn't change any
Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
> -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
>
> --
>
>
> Drivers really only work well in SMP if they actually can be selected.
> This is a leftover from the time when the 6pack drive only used to be
> a bitrotten
Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
Drivers really only work well in SMP if they actually can be selected.
This is a leftover from the time when the 6pack drive only used to be
a bitrotten variant of the
makes a difference
(the patch applies on top of the current driver).
Can you issue a simple 'ethtool -s eth0 autoneg off' and report what
happens ?
[html]
Sorry, it was just a notice for Lars
--
Ueimor
Do not update StationControl after the link was forced.
Signed-off-by: Francois Romieu
-off-by: Francois Romieu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff -puN drivers/net/sis190.c~sis190-030 drivers/net/sis190.c
--- linux-2.6.13-rc1-gitXX/drivers/net/sis190.c~sis190-030 2005-07-09
22:11:02.381627199 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.13-rc1-gitXX-romieu/drivers/net/sis190.c 2005-07-09
22:25:37.537549276 +0200
Pascal CHAPPERON <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
[...]
> That one works perfectly; i tried it in the same conditions as
> the previous patch, and i don't notice a regression.
Nice.
[...]
> sis190-010.patch does not compile properly :
Point taken. Thanks.
[...]
> But i get those traces in syslog, when
Pascal CHAPPERON [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
[...]
That one works perfectly; i tried it in the same conditions as
the previous patch, and i don't notice a regression.
Nice.
[...]
sis190-010.patch does not compile properly :
Point taken. Thanks.
[...]
But i get those traces in syslog, when the
Pascal CHAPPERON <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
[...]
> I can not make other tries before Monday, but i'll take a
> look at the media management after...
>
> BTW, can you remove the following printks from the patch ?
> The printks in interrupt functions make dmesg unusuable,
> and the stuff in
Pascal CHAPPERON [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
[...]
I can not make other tries before Monday, but i'll take a
look at the media management after...
BTW, can you remove the following printks from the patch ?
The printks in interrupt functions make dmesg unusuable,
and the stuff in sis190_get_drvinfo
Steve French <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
[...]
> There was a patch suggested a year or so ago to remove the older cifs
> md5 implementation and have cifsencrypt.c use the newer Linux crypto
> API, but since it made the code considerably more complex it did not
> make any sense. The current crypto API
Steve French [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
[...]
There was a patch suggested a year or so ago to remove the older cifs
md5 implementation and have cifsencrypt.c use the newer Linux crypto
API, but since it made the code considerably more complex it did not
make any sense. The current crypto API seems to
TommyDrum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
[new brand of r8169 adapter coming into town]
> and dmesg for both:
>
> kernel native:
>
> ACPI: PCI interrupt :00:09.0[A] -> GSI 11 (level, low) -> IRQ 11
> eth0: Identified chip type is 'RTL8169s/8110s'.
> eth0: U.S. Robotics 10/100/1000 PCI NIC driver
TommyDrum [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
[new brand of r8169 adapter coming into town]
and dmesg for both:
kernel native:
ACPI: PCI interrupt :00:09.0[A] - GSI 11 (level, low) - IRQ 11
eth0: Identified chip type is 'RTL8169s/8110s'.
eth0: U.S. Robotics 10/100/1000 PCI NIC driver version 2.0 at
Manfred Spraul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
[...]
> I always thought that all callers of dev->hard_start_xmit() acquire
> dev->xmit_lock before calling hard_start_xmit().
>
> Is that assumption wrong? I think I even rely on that in one of my
> drivers.
Afaik, no, it is right.
This part of the r8169
Manfred Spraul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
> [Jeff added to cc list - it's a network driver question]
[...]
> I haven't read the whole driver, but what about
> spin_unlock_wait(>xmit_lock);
> ?
The race here is a dev->close() against dev->hard_start_xmit() one where
dev->hard_start_xmit() does
Manfred Spraul [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
[Jeff added to cc list - it's a network driver question]
[...]
I haven't read the whole driver, but what about
spin_unlock_wait(dev-xmit_lock);
?
The race here is a dev-close() against dev-hard_start_xmit() one where
dev-hard_start_xmit() does not do
Manfred Spraul [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
[...]
I always thought that all callers of dev-hard_start_xmit() acquire
dev-xmit_lock before calling hard_start_xmit().
Is that assumption wrong? I think I even rely on that in one of my
drivers.
Afaik, no, it is right.
This part of the r8169 driver
Paul E. McKenney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
> This patch changes calls to synchronize_kernel(), deprecated in the
> earlier "Deprecate synchronize_kernel, GPL replacement" patch to
> instead call the new synchronize_rcu() and synchronize_sched() APIs.
[...]
> diff -urpN -X dontdiff
Paul E. McKenney [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
This patch changes calls to synchronize_kernel(), deprecated in the
earlier Deprecate synchronize_kernel, GPL replacement patch to
instead call the new synchronize_rcu() and synchronize_sched() APIs.
[...]
diff -urpN -X dontdiff
Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
> Andi Kleen wrote:
[r8169 driver]
> >It does not seem to support DAC (or rather it breaks with DAC enabled),
> >which makes it not very useful on any machine with >3GB of memory.
>
> Driver bug. I can futz with it and get it to do 64-bit on my Athlon64.
Care
Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
Andi Kleen wrote:
[r8169 driver]
It does not seem to support DAC (or rather it breaks with DAC enabled),
which makes it not very useful on any machine with 3GB of memory.
Driver bug. I can futz with it and get it to do 64-bit on my Athlon64.
Care to send a
It took a bit longer than expected but the backport of the r8169 driver
has been updated for kernel 2.4.29.
Noticeable changes since 12/2004:
- better handling of PHY as found on Acer Aspire 1524WLMi (Richard Dawe);
- fix a bug triggered when the device is brought down then up again;
- avoid a
It took a bit longer than expected but the backport of the r8169 driver
has been updated for kernel 2.4.29.
Noticeable changes since 12/2004:
- better handling of PHY as found on Acer Aspire 1524WLMi (Richard Dawe);
- fix a bug triggered when the device is brought down then up again;
- avoid a
Daniel Egger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
[...]
> NFS machines on the Gbit network will resume operation) I popped
> in the chp RealTek card (which caused some slight problems
> like permanent hangs and bad performance before) and everything
> works like a charm. Of course, after throwing in some
Daniel Egger [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
[...]
NFS machines on the Gbit network will resume operation) I popped
in the chp RealTek card (which caused some slight problems
like permanent hangs and bad performance before) and everything
works like a charm. Of course, after throwing in some extra
Cameron Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
[r8169 crash]
> Linux laptop 2.6.11-rc1-mm1 #2 SMP Sun Jan 16 22:36:26 GMT 2005 i686
^^
[...]
> I would try a newer kernel, but the command line options for
> specifying the framebuffer settings seems to have changed in the
> latest
Cameron Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
[r8169 crash]
Linux laptop 2.6.11-rc1-mm1 #2 SMP Sun Jan 16 22:36:26 GMT 2005 i686
^^
[...]
I would try a newer kernel, but the command line options for
specifying the framebuffer settings seems to have changed in the
latest kernel
Jonas Oreland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
[...]
> Report:
> 1) It works somewhat better. irq doesn't get disabled.
> 2) however wlan card get disfunctional. I haven't been able to contact my
> wap
> even if i'm standing on it...
> 3) unplug has resulted in kernel panic (twice)
> (btw: how do I do
Jonas Oreland [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
[...]
Report:
1) It works somewhat better. irq doesn't get disabled.
2) however wlan card get disfunctional. I haven't been able to contact my
wap
even if i'm standing on it...
3) unplug has resulted in kernel panic (twice)
(btw: how do I do to capture
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
[...]
> diff -puN drivers/block/umem.c~pci_register_driver-drivers_block
> drivers/block/umem.c
> --- kj/drivers/block/umem.c~pci_register_driver-drivers_block 2005-03-05
> 16:12:16.0 +0100
> +++ kj-domen/drivers/block/umem.c 2005-03-05
Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
> Greg KH wrote:
[...]
> >An alias would probably be easier, unless you think everything sent
> >there should be archived?
>
> I do. But I don't have a strong opinion on the subject.
A bk-commit mailing-list would be nice.
--
Ueimor
-
To unsubscribe from this
Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
Greg KH wrote:
[...]
An alias would probably be easier, unless you think everything sent
there should be archived?
I do. But I don't have a strong opinion on the subject.
A bk-commit mailing-list would be nice.
--
Ueimor
-
To unsubscribe from this list:
Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
[...]
> Agree it needs fixing, but I actually think the rx-offset stuff is more
> urgent than this. For the future, it would be useful for both of us to
> have separate r8169-fixes and r8169-cleanups queues.
Do you have a synonym/pointer for the rx-offset
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
[...]
> - Last, final, ultimate call: if anyone has patches in here which are 2.6.11
> material, please tell me.
Any chance to convince the alien who took control of Jeff's libata queue to
push:
r8169: synchronization and balancing when the device is closed
Factor out some code
Signed-off-by: Francois Romieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff -puN drivers/net/r8169.c~r8169-460 drivers/net/r8169.c
--- a/drivers/net/r8169.c~r8169-460 2005-02-23 21:35:28.715271999 +0100
+++ b/drivers/net/r8169.c 2005-02-23 21:35:28.720271177 +0100
@@ -495,6 +
it safe to request a change of mtu on a live device.
Signed-off-by: Francois Romieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff -puN drivers/net/r8169.c~r8169-450 drivers/net/r8169.c
--- a/drivers/net/r8169.c~r8169-450 2005-02-23 21:35:21.112521942 +0100
+++ b/drivers/net/r8169.c 2005-02-23
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
> There are already a bunch of r8169 patches in Jeff's tree. The combination
> isn't pretty:
[removed by parental advisory]
I sent r8169-4{0/1/2/3/4}0 on netdev + Jeff the 22/02/2005. Jeff's netdev
(thus your tree) already had the r8169-3xx changes.
Jeff has
Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
There are already a bunch of r8169 patches in Jeff's tree. The combination
isn't pretty:
[removed by parental advisory]
I sent r8169-4{0/1/2/3/4}0 on netdev + Jeff the 22/02/2005. Jeff's netdev
(thus your tree) already had the r8169-3xx changes.
Jeff has
it safe to request a change of mtu on a live device.
Signed-off-by: Francois Romieu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff -puN drivers/net/r8169.c~r8169-450 drivers/net/r8169.c
--- a/drivers/net/r8169.c~r8169-450 2005-02-23 21:35:21.112521942 +0100
+++ b/drivers/net/r8169.c 2005-02-23 21:35:21.117521120
Factor out some code
Signed-off-by: Francois Romieu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff -puN drivers/net/r8169.c~r8169-460 drivers/net/r8169.c
--- a/drivers/net/r8169.c~r8169-460 2005-02-23 21:35:28.715271999 +0100
+++ b/drivers/net/r8169.c 2005-02-23 21:35:28.720271177 +0100
@@ -495,6 +495,13
Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
[...]
- Last, final, ultimate call: if anyone has patches in here which are 2.6.11
material, please tell me.
Any chance to convince the alien who took control of Jeff's libata queue to
push:
r8169: synchronization and balancing when the device is closed
Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
[...]
Agree it needs fixing, but I actually think the rx-offset stuff is more
urgent than this. For the future, it would be useful for both of us to
have separate r8169-fixes and r8169-cleanups queues.
Do you have a synonym/pointer for the rx-offset stuff ?
An update of the r8169 driver is available for the 2.6.11-rc4 kernel.
Noticable changes:
- better handling of PHY as found on Acer Aspire 1524WLMi (Richard Dawe);
- fix a bug triggered when the device is brought down then up again;
- avoid a few lost/screaming interrupts;
- closed a race when a
An update of the r8169 driver is available for the 2.6.11-rc4 kernel.
Noticable changes:
- better handling of PHY as found on Acer Aspire 1524WLMi (Richard Dawe);
- fix a bug triggered when the device is brought down then up again;
- avoid a few lost/screaming interrupts;
- closed a race when a
Alexandre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
[...]
> thanks again, unfortunately PCs with those cards are at work, and from
> today that's holidays until march 7th... :D
Excellent. Your testing will not impact the normal production.
I have done a minor update to sync with Jeff's latest -netdev
shishir verma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
> by any chance is the watchdog enabled for the card...because i had a
> similar problem with a broadcom gigabit cardi commented the
> watchdog code and made the module again...
> it worked like a charm for me after that...
The original user wrote:
[...]
>
Alexandre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
[...]
> Any other idea ?
Please try:
http://www.fr.zoreil.com/~francois/misc/20050202-2.4.29-r8169.c-test.patch
Compile with gcc-3.x and send/publish _complete_ dmesg + lspci -vx +
cat /proc/interrupts + ifconfig if it still hangs.
--
Ueimor
-
To unsubscribe from
Alexandre [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
[...]
Any other idea ?
Please try:
http://www.fr.zoreil.com/~francois/misc/20050202-2.4.29-r8169.c-test.patch
Compile with gcc-3.x and send/publish _complete_ dmesg + lspci -vx +
cat /proc/interrupts + ifconfig if it still hangs.
--
Ueimor
-
To unsubscribe from
shishir verma [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
by any chance is the watchdog enabled for the card...because i had a
similar problem with a broadcom gigabit cardi commented the
watchdog code and made the module again...
it worked like a charm for me after that...
The original user wrote:
[...]
If I
Alexandre [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
[...]
thanks again, unfortunately PCs with those cards are at work, and from
today that's holidays until march 7th... :D
Excellent. Your testing will not impact the normal production.
I have done a minor update to sync with Jeff's latest -netdev
Alexandre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
[...]
> Or any idea why the problem occurs and how to correct this (if it is
> possbile)?
Upgrade the compiler if you use gcc 2.95.x.
--
Ueimor
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alexandre [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
[...]
Or any idea why the problem occurs and how to correct this (if it is
possbile)?
Upgrade the compiler if you use gcc 2.95.x.
--
Ueimor
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More
Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
[...]
> this is hopefully the last -rc kernel before the real 2.6.11, so please
> give it a whirl, and complain loudly about anything broken.
- dscc4 (patch in Jeff's -netdev)
Apart the fact that the driver crashes on module insertion and is
unusable,
Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
[...]
this is hopefully the last -rc kernel before the real 2.6.11, so please
give it a whirl, and complain loudly about anything broken.
- dscc4 (patch in Jeff's -netdev)
Apart the fact that the driver crashes on module insertion and is
unusable, users
Stelian Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
[...]
> Now, suppose one of my patches introduced a problem. How can someone
> not using BK isolate the patch which introduced the problem ? All he
> can do is to back out the entire set of patches, and the whole point
> of having split the patch initialy into
Stelian Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
[...]
Now, suppose one of my patches introduced a problem. How can someone
not using BK isolate the patch which introduced the problem ? All he
can do is to back out the entire set of patches, and the whole point
of having split the patch initialy into logical
Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
> It's generally agreed that subscribers-only mailing lists shouldn't be
> listed in MAINTAINERS (since it's impossible to send a simple Cc to such
> a list).
What about marking the mailing-list as subscriber-only instead of
removing information ?
--
Ueimor
-
Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
It's generally agreed that subscribers-only mailing lists shouldn't be
listed in MAINTAINERS (since it's impossible to send a simple Cc to such
a list).
What about marking the mailing-list as subscriber-only instead of
removing information ?
--
Ueimor
-
To
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
[...]
> I've also made a patch, my first too :))) :
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=4450=view
>
> I don't know if the patch is correct, but i think
The second hunk is not strictly needed. It could be removed.
> Should I do some other thing
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
[...]
I've also made a patch, my first too :))) :
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=4450action=view
I don't know if the patch is correct, but i think
The second hunk is not strictly needed. It could be removed.
Should I do some other thing ?
Cornel Ciocirlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ecrit :
[heavy linux networking rewrite in sight]
> Is it useful at all ? Point b) above could be implemented in userspace
> (Actually I've done a basic skeleton a while ago). Are the others worth
> the trouble ?
>
> What do you gurus think ?
* Are you sure
Cornel Ciocirlan [EMAIL PROTECTED] ecrit :
[heavy linux networking rewrite in sight]
Is it useful at all ? Point b) above could be implemented in userspace
(Actually I've done a basic skeleton a while ago). Are the others worth
the trouble ?
What do you gurus think ?
* Are you sure of
Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ecrit :
[...]
> --- /spare/tmp/linux-2.4.7-pre3/drivers/net/epic100.c Mon Jul 2 21:03:04 2001
> +++ linux/drivers/net/epic100.c Fri Jul 6 12:56:40 2001
[...]
> /* The user-configurable values.
> @@ -448,7 +451,7 @@
> outl(0x0008, ioaddr + TEST1);
>
Juergen Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ecrit :
[...]
> Luckily I got a very helpfull hint from Hans-Christian Armingeon in
> reply to my questions here on the list. The epic100.c from
> http://lrcwww.epfl.ch/~boch/sw/epic100.c.txt fixes the problem in all
> the affected kernel versions.
Interesting.
Juergen Wolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] ecrit :
[...]
Luckily I got a very helpfull hint from Hans-Christian Armingeon in
reply to my questions here on the list. The epic100.c from
http://lrcwww.epfl.ch/~boch/sw/epic100.c.txt fixes the problem in all
the affected kernel versions.
Interesting.
-
Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] ecrit :
[...]
--- /spare/tmp/linux-2.4.7-pre3/drivers/net/epic100.c Mon Jul 2 21:03:04 2001
+++ linux/drivers/net/epic100.c Fri Jul 6 12:56:40 2001
[...]
/* The user-configurable values.
@@ -448,7 +451,7 @@
outl(0x0008, ioaddr + TEST1);
Juergen Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ecrit :
[...]
Jul 2 13:06:59 localhost kernel: eth0: Too much work at interrupt,
IntrStatus=0x008d0004.
Receive Status Valid
Receive Copy In Progress
Transmit Idle
Receive Queue Empty -> no more receive buffer available
It looks like one waits too long before
Florian Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ecrit :
[...]
> Same problem here, it won't run at all on newer kernels. But it isn't even
> 100% stable in 2.2.x here - on very high network traffic the card stops
> working. In this case, it helps to pull the network plug for a short time,
Could you
Florian Schmitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] ecrit :
[...]
Same problem here, it won't run at all on newer kernels. But it isn't even
100% stable in 2.2.x here - on very high network traffic the card stops
working. In this case, it helps to pull the network plug for a short time,
Could you specify
Juergen Wolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] ecrit :
[...]
Jul 2 13:06:59 localhost kernel: eth0: Too much work at interrupt,
IntrStatus=0x008d0004.
Receive Status Valid
Receive Copy In Progress
Transmit Idle
Receive Queue Empty - no more receive buffer available
It looks like one waits too long before
Jon Forsberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ecrit :
[...]
> Prints the same messages as before but continues working afterwards. No need
> for ifdown/ifup in other words. No crash so far.
I'll polish and submit it to the maintainer next week then.
--
Ueimor
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
Jon Forsberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] ecrit :
[...]
Prints the same messages as before but continues working afterwards. No need
for ifdown/ifup in other words. No crash so far.
I'll polish and submit it to the maintainer next week then.
--
Ueimor
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
701 - 800 of 914 matches
Mail list logo
