Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Aug 2007 04:44:32 +0200
> Frank Benkstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Frank Benkstein wrote:
>>> I wonder why there are different permissions needed for VT_PROCESS
>>> (access to the current virtual console) and VT_LOC
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Aug 2007 00:22:38 +0200 Frank Benkstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I wonder why there are different permissions needed for VT_PROCESS
>> (access to the current virtual console) and VT_LOCKSWITCH
>> (CAP_SYS_TTY_CONFIG
Frank Benkstein wrote:
> I wonder why there are different permissions needed for VT_PROCESS
> (access to the current virtual console) and VT_LOCKSWITCH
> (CAP_SYS_TTY_CONFIG).
To be more direct:
require CAP_SYS_TTY_CONFIG for VT_SETMODE as its essentially the same as
VT_LOCKSWITCH
, I see no practical difference between the two.
Please CC me on replies, I am not on the list.
Best regards
Frank Benkstein.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.
4 matches
Mail list logo