Re: [2.6.21.1] SATA freeze

Robert Hancock wrote: Fred Moyer wrote: This appears to be a different problem. Something is issuing SMART-related commands (smartd or smartctl perhaps) which the drive seems to be reacting strangely to. It apparently completed the command but never raised DRQ to request any data being

Re: [2.6.21.1] SATA freeze

Robert Hancock wrote: Fred Moyer wrote: I just joined the list today so apologies if this email breaks any email client post threading. I have been seeing similar errors on two different systems. I applied Robert's sata_nv patch posted to the list on May 5th, and approved today by

Re: Re: [2.6.21.1] SATA freeze

Robert Hancock wrote: >Gerhard Mack wrote: >> On Wed, 9 May 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote: >>> Gerhard Mack wrote: May 9 14:51:35 mgerhard kernel: ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x180 action 0x2 frozen May 9 14:51:35 mgerhard kernel: ata1.00: cmd 35/00:00:80:6d:c8