mount + pid namespacing broken ?

2013-06-01 Thread Frederic Riss
Hello, I had a little application making use of pid and mount namespaces to isolate some processes on some machines. This all worked well on 3.7 boxes. A coworker upgraded his machine and noticed that things weren't working anymore on 3.8. The symptom he noticed is that remounting /proc inside

mount + pid namespacing broken ?

2013-06-01 Thread Frederic Riss
Hello, I had a little application making use of pid and mount namespaces to isolate some processes on some machines. This all worked well on 3.7 boxes. A coworker upgraded his machine and noticed that things weren't working anymore on 3.8. The symptom he noticed is that remounting /proc inside

Re: [3/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2)

2007-03-26 Thread Frederic Riss
2007/3/26, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 08:53:20PM +0200, Frédéric Riss wrote: >... (In fact it hangs at the second suspend, but that's another ATA > problem that I think has already been reported). This sounds like the MSI problem. Do you have CONFIG_PCI_MSI

Re: [3/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2)

2007-03-26 Thread Frederic Riss
2007/3/26, Thomas Gleixner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On Mon, 2007-03-26 at 08:45 +0200, Frédéric RISS wrote: > Additional data point: I just tried with -rc5 and the issue is still > present. The config I used for this test defines neither NO_HZ nor > HIGH_RES_TIMERS. Do you have CONFIG_HPET_TIMER

Re: [3/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2)

2007-03-26 Thread Frederic Riss
2007/3/26, Thomas Gleixner [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Mon, 2007-03-26 at 08:45 +0200, Frédéric RISS wrote: Additional data point: I just tried with -rc5 and the issue is still present. The config I used for this test defines neither NO_HZ nor HIGH_RES_TIMERS. Do you have CONFIG_HPET_TIMER enabled

Re: [3/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2)

2007-03-26 Thread Frederic Riss
2007/3/26, Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 08:53:20PM +0200, Frédéric Riss wrote: ... (In fact it hangs at the second suspend, but that's another ATA problem that I think has already been reported). This sounds like the MSI problem. Do you have CONFIG_PCI_MSI enabled?

Re: [PATCH] EFI x86: pass firmware call parameters on the stack

2007-02-01 Thread Frederic Riss
2007/2/1, bibo,mao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: currently x86_64 kernel does not support efi, efi convention comply to MS convention. On ia32 parameter is passed on stack, on x86_64 parameter is passed by registers but that is different from x86_64 linux convention. Is an x86_64 EFI firmware required

Re: [PATCH] EFI x86: pass firmware call parameters on the stack

2007-02-01 Thread Frederic Riss
2007/2/1, bibo,mao [EMAIL PROTECTED]: currently x86_64 kernel does not support efi, efi convention comply to MS convention. On ia32 parameter is passed on stack, on x86_64 parameter is passed by registers but that is different from x86_64 linux convention. Is an x86_64 EFI firmware required to