> George France <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Here is a trivial patch that will make ksymoops work again on Alpha.
Cleaner patch.
diff -urN linux-2.4.5-ac3-orig/arch/alpha/kernel/traps.c
linux-2.4.5/arch/alpha/kernel/traps.c
--- linux-2.4.5-ac3-orig/arch/alpha/kernel/traps.c
Here is a trivial patch that will make ksymoops work again on Alpha.
--George
diff -urN linux-2.4.5-ac3-orig/arch/alpha/kernel/traps.c
linux/arch/alpha/kernel/traps.c
--- linux-2.4.5-ac3-orig/arch/alpha/kernel/traps.c Thu May 24 17:24:37 2001
+++ linux/arch/alpha/kernel/traps.c Mon May
On Monday 28 May 2001 13:45, Jay Thorne wrote:
> Problem solved, thanks to the rawhide patch from Richard Henderson
> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) posted on Sunday. Performance is ~10megs/second both
> directions, using tulip, de4x5 or via-rhine.
Well Done, Richard.
>
> Using 2.4.4-ac15 it works fine. I'
Hello Andrea,
Jay, if the problem still exist in 2.4.5-pre6aa1 (please try the new kernel),
then I will have tech op's check this on Tuesday (Monday is a US holiday).
We should be able to duplicate this in the hardware lab and find the problem
with a logic analyser.
Best Regards,
--George
On Friday 25 May 2001 19:05, Jay Thorne wrote:
> On 25 May 2001 18:52:33 -0400, George France wrote:
> > Hello Jay,
> >
> > I see that you are using the tulip driver. Could you try the de4x5
> > driver??
>
> Its worse: reports 3.1 MBs and 1.6 MBs
wuftp is no
Hello Jay,
I see that you are using the tulip driver. Could you try the de4x5 driver??
Best Regards,
--George
On Friday 25 May 2001 17:50, Jay Thorne wrote:
> [1.] One line summary of the problem:
> Kernel 2.4.4 ac15
> Tested with several cards and pieces of software, the outbound bandwidt
diff -urN linux-2.4.2-ac20-orig/drivers/net/de4x5.c
linux-2.4.2-ac20/drivers/net/de4x5.c
--- linux-2.4.2-ac20-orig/drivers/net/de4x5.c Mon Mar 19 17:24:04 2001
+++ linux-2.4.2-ac20/drivers/net/de4x5.cMon Mar 19 18:32:01 2001
@@ -429,11 +429,17 @@
<[EMAIL PROTE
Alan, excuse me, would you like to rephase that?? I already told Russell I
agreed with him that nothing could be done, at this late date. Read the
archives.
I quote myself. "I will agree with you that there is probably nothing that
can be done this
close to the release of 2.4.0"
Please also read
> > believe that no problem can be solved with a flame war
> going on. That is why
> > I decide to stop speaking with him about the serial port
> issue. He then
> > decided to block the e-mails. So here we are.
>
> Well if you arent speaking to him, then it doesnt matter if
> he blocks your
>
Hello Alan;
> I can see where his confusion arises, but yes you are right,
> people need to be
> able to mix the 16x50 driver with the sa1100 driver. The ppc
> people went through
> fixing this.
Yes you should be able to mix 16x50 chips with sa1100 chips. That is not the
issue. I believe that
Hello Mike;
> Ok. I didn't mean to imply anything.. It just wasn't clear, and
> due to the nature of the discussion, it seemed that it might have
> been a private message..
>
No problem. I should have took more time in writing my e-mail and inserted
the headers.
Best Regards,
--George
-
T
Eric Mouw from the LART group will be posting the whole thing in a little
while.
Patience.
--George
> -Original Message-
> From: Alan Cox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2000 5:12 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Russell King
Relax. Russel posted this to a public mailing list.
--George
> If that was a personal email from him to you (ie: not public)
> then it was very distasteful and disrespectful of you to post it
> here publically. You should have at least quoted the header
> lines to make it clear...
>
> Just my
Russell;
>
> George France writes:
> > As you probably know Russell King is the maintainer of ARM
> Linux. Him and I
> > have been debating how serial ports should be handled on an
> off for months
> > now. IMHO, today he lost it,
>
> Please note that a
mailing list
and web pages, for those that wish to participate. It is too bad that
Russell has decided to create a fork in the ARM Linux tree. It is his
choice.
Attached is his e-mail for the curious.
Best Regards,
--George
George France, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cambridge Research Laboratory, Compaq
Hello Pavel;
> Is anyone using cramfs?
>
We use cramfs everyday at http://handhelds.org with Linux
2.4.0-test6-rmk1-np2-hh1. We have no problems.
> I copy cramfs image from nfs onto /dev/ram0, then mount it. It mounts,
> and first few accesses are okay, but then it breaks. ls shows garbage
> e
16 matches
Mail list logo
