Re: 2.6.23: does it supposed to work on an i486?

2007-11-30 Thread Gerb Stralko
> Well, I applied the patch (in 2.6.23 it's > arch/i386/boot/pmjump.S, > not > arch/x86/boot/pmjump.S, > but that's minor) - still the same behavior, it still reboots > instantly right when bootloader gave control to the kernel. > So it must be something else.. ;) It should be x86, they merged

Re: 2.6.23: does it supposed to work on an i486?

2007-11-30 Thread Gerb Stralko
Well, I applied the patch (in 2.6.23 it's arch/i386/boot/pmjump.S, not arch/x86/boot/pmjump.S, but that's minor) - still the same behavior, it still reboots instantly right when bootloader gave control to the kernel. So it must be something else.. ;) It should be x86, they merged the

Re: Gmail and flowed text (was Re: Correction to LZO1X)

2007-07-11 Thread Gerb Stralko
> > On 7/11/07, Gerb Stralko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [...] > > This link will help: > > http://www.ii.com/internet/messaging/pine/pc/#gmail > > > > Scroll down untill you see a yellow box section that say: > > Gmail Tips > > * If you w

Re: Gmail and flowed text (was Re: Correction to LZO1X)

2007-07-11 Thread Gerb Stralko
2) If you have a box available at home (or elsewhere), use that to relay mail through. read linux mail from you gmail account. When you need to send a patch, send it from a linux box using pine, but change the From to your gmail account. Like Jesper suggested works great! Best of both

Re: Gmail and flowed text (was Re: Correction to LZO1X)

2007-07-11 Thread Gerb Stralko
2) If you have a box available at home (or elsewhere), use that to relay mail through. read linux mail from you gmail account. When you need to send a patch, send it from a linux box using pine, but change the From to your gmail account. Like Jesper suggested works great! Best of both

Re: Gmail and flowed text (was Re: Correction to LZO1X)

2007-07-11 Thread Gerb Stralko
do you have ssh access? if so, setup a linux machine outside of this evil network and ssh into it. ssh is pretty configurable to get around firewalls/nats. enjoy On 7/11/07, Satyam Sharma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 7/11/07, Satyam Sharma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, On 7/11/07, Gerb

Re: [PATCH] ARM/ARM26 Cleanup, using ARRAY_SIZE

2007-05-23 Thread Gerb Stralko
On 5/23/07, Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 01:27:11PM -0400, Gerb Stralko wrote: > Use the kernel wide ARRAY_SIZE when determining the array size of a struct. > > Signed-off-by: Jerry Stralko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Whitespace damanged patch,

[PATCH] ARM/ARM26 Cleanup, using ARRAY_SIZE

2007-05-23 Thread Gerb Stralko
Use the kernel wide ARRAY_SIZE when determining the array size of a struct. Signed-off-by: Jerry Stralko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/dma-isa.c b/arch/arm/kernel/dma-isa.c index 0a3e9ad..c94ad71 100644 --- a/arch/arm/kernel/dma-isa.c +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/dma-isa.c @@

[PATCH] ARM/ARM26 Cleanup, using ARRAY_SIZE

2007-05-23 Thread Gerb Stralko
Use the kernel wide ARRAY_SIZE when determining the array size of a struct. Signed-off-by: Jerry Stralko [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/dma-isa.c b/arch/arm/kernel/dma-isa.c index 0a3e9ad..c94ad71 100644 --- a/arch/arm/kernel/dma-isa.c +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/dma-isa.c @@

Re: [PATCH] ARM/ARM26 Cleanup, using ARRAY_SIZE

2007-05-23 Thread Gerb Stralko
On 5/23/07, Russell King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 01:27:11PM -0400, Gerb Stralko wrote: Use the kernel wide ARRAY_SIZE when determining the array size of a struct. Signed-off-by: Jerry Stralko [EMAIL PROTECTED] Whitespace damanged patch, probably due to using format

Re: GIT and the current -stable

2007-04-14 Thread Gerb Stralko
Please don't do this. Using the same name for a branch as for a tag is madness. Call it "v2.6.20-stable" or anything else, but don't re-use the same naming as for tags. Yes I have done this before, and it took me awhile to realize what was going on. It caused me some grief, and a few hours of

Re: GIT and the current -stable

2007-04-14 Thread Gerb Stralko
Please don't do this. Using the same name for a branch as for a tag is madness. Call it v2.6.20-stable or anything else, but don't re-use the same naming as for tags. Yes I have done this before, and it took me awhile to realize what was going on. It caused me some grief, and a few hours of

Re: Student Project Ideas

2007-03-30 Thread Gerb Stralko
http://www.netnice.org/ it does exactly that...this project started at my college, and we've done some cool research with this little project. Take a look, alot of research papers too... On 3/30/07, Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi! > I've been hacking on the Linux kernel all

Re: Student Project Ideas

2007-03-30 Thread Gerb Stralko
http://www.netnice.org/ it does exactly that...this project started at my college, and we've done some cool research with this little project. Take a look, alot of research papers too... On 3/30/07, Pavel Machek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi! I've been hacking on the Linux kernel all semester

Re: [RFC][PATCH] Apple SMC driver (hardware monitoring and control)

2007-03-20 Thread Gerb Stralko
+/* data port used by apple SMC */ +#define APPLESMC_DATA_PORT 0x300 +/* command/status port used by apple SMC */ +#define APPLESMC_CMD_PORT 0x304 + +#define APPLESMC_NR_PORTS 5 /* 0x300-0x304 */ + +#define APPLESMC_STATUS_MASK 0x0f +#define APPLESMC_READ_CMD 0x10 +#define

Re: [RFC][PATCH] Apple SMC driver (hardware monitoring and control)

2007-03-20 Thread Gerb Stralko
+/* data port used by apple SMC */ +#define APPLESMC_DATA_PORT 0x300 +/* command/status port used by apple SMC */ +#define APPLESMC_CMD_PORT 0x304 + +#define APPLESMC_NR_PORTS 5 /* 0x300-0x304 */ + +#define APPLESMC_STATUS_MASK 0x0f +#define APPLESMC_READ_CMD 0x10 +#define

Re: How to get the processor ID at run-time?

2006-12-28 Thread Gerb Stralko
I am writing a kernel module that creates a kernel thread on a SMP platform. How to get the ID of the processor the kernel thread run on? Have any kernel API? THX Raymond try smp_processor_id() it returns an unsigned int. Thanks, jerry - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Re: How to get the processor ID at run-time?

2006-12-28 Thread Gerb Stralko
I am writing a kernel module that creates a kernel thread on a SMP platform. How to get the ID of the processor the kernel thread run on? Have any kernel API? THX Raymond try smp_processor_id() it returns an unsigned int. Thanks, jerry - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line