Re: kqueue microbenchmark results

Jonathan Lemon wrote: > > Also, consider the following scenario for the proposed get_event(): > >1. packet arrives, queues an event. >2. user retrieves event. >3. second packet arrives, queues event again. >4. user reads() all data. > > Now, next time around the loop, we get a

Re: Linux's implementation of poll() not scalable?

> > > > On Tue, 24 Oct 2000, Evan Jeffrey wrote: > > > > > Multiple event queues are bad, because it completely breaks the notion of > > > even-driven programming. How do you want to listen to them all? You can't. > > > You can only listen to one event queue at a time - unless you create some