Re: Samba performance / zero-copy network I/O

2001-02-19 Thread Gord R. Lamb
On Sat, 17 Feb 2001, Anton Blanchard wrote: > > > Hmm. Yeah, I think that may be one of the problems (Intel's card isn't > > supported afaik; if I have to I'll switch to 3com, or hopelessly try to > > implement support). I'm looking for a patch to implement sendfile in > > Samba, as Alan sugges

Re: Samba performance / zero-copy network I/O

2001-02-15 Thread Gord R. Lamb
On Wed, 14 Feb 2001, Tom Sightler wrote: > Quoting "Gord R. Lamb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > On Wed, 14 Feb 2001, Jeremy Jackson wrote: > > > > > "Gord R. Lamb" wrote: > > > > in etherchannel bond, running > > linux-2.4.1+sm

Re: Samba performance / zero-copy network I/O

2001-02-14 Thread Gord R. Lamb
On Wed, 14 Feb 2001, Jeremy Jackson wrote: > "Gord R. Lamb" wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > > > I'm trying to optimize a box for samba file serving (just contiguous block > > I/O for the moment), and I've now got both CPUs maxxed out with system

Samba performance / zero-copy network I/O

2001-02-14 Thread Gord R. Lamb
isunderstanding this completely? :) Regards, - Gord R. Lamb ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the F