On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 12:22:40AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 05/22/2014 12:14 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartmann wrote:
> > On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 03:59:58PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 01:04:04PM -0700, Francesco Ruggeri wrote:
> >>> I h
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 03:59:58PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 01:04:04PM -0700, Francesco Ruggeri wrote:
> > I have been using an x86 platform.
> > When I started working on it I got early crashes until I added the
> > check for p not NULL in
> >
> > +void
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 03:59:58PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 01:04:04PM -0700, Francesco Ruggeri wrote:
I have been using an x86 platform.
When I started working on it I got early crashes until I added the
check for p not NULL in
+void
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 12:22:40AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 05/22/2014 12:14 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartmann wrote:
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 03:59:58PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 01:04:04PM -0700, Francesco Ruggeri wrote:
I have been using an x86 platform.
When I
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 09:58:28PM -0800, David Rientjes wrote:
> The patches getting proposed through -mm for stable boggles my mind
> sometimes.
Do you have any objections to patches that I have taken for -stable? If
so, please let me know.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list:
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 09:58:28PM -0800, David Rientjes wrote:
The patches getting proposed through -mm for stable boggles my mind
sometimes.
Do you have any objections to patches that I have taken for -stable? If
so, please let me know.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 08:11:45PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 01:56:31PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > > That single patch doesn't apply cleanly to Linus'
> > > > > 8c84bf4166a4698296342841a549bbee03860ac0
> > > > >
> > > > > What else is necessary?
> > > >
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 08:11:45PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 01:56:31PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
That single patch doesn't apply cleanly to Linus'
8c84bf4166a4698296342841a549bbee03860ac0
What else is necessary?
Your tree seems
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 01:44:24PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 13:40 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartmann wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 01:31:56PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 20:48 +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > > > On Mon,
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 01:31:56PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 20:48 +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 20:27 +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
> > > > I noticed that the format of the oom-killer output seems
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 01:31:56PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 20:48 +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 20:27 +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Dave Jones da...@redhat.com wrote:
I noticed that the format of the oom-killer output
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 01:44:24PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 13:40 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartmann wrote:
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 01:31:56PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 20:48 +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 20:27 +0200, Kay Sievers
12 matches
Mail list logo
