Alan Cox kirjoitti:
doesn't mean it's derived from Linux. In the case of user-space code
it's widely understood that no licence restrictions are conferred. The
Actually that is also questionable. The only reason it is fairly certain
in Linux is Linus went to the trouble of stating that i
Takashi Iwai kirjoitti:
At Sun, 24 Jun 2007 19:51:38 +0200 (CEST),
Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
Few dayas ago OSS source code was oppened uder CDDL for Solaris and GLPv2
for Linux:
http://www.opensound.com/press/2007/oss-gpl-cddl.txt
So this source without problems code can be integragrated in Li
Tomasz Kłoczko kirjoitti:
On Sun, 24 Jun 2007, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Jun 24 2007 21:24, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
Try to answer on question "ALSA or OSS ?" using *only* technical
arguments.
Ok: The OSS cs46xx driver did not support the rear 2 channels.
The cs46xx OSS driver in the kernel is
Takashi Iwai kirjoitti:
At Mon, 25 Jun 2007 10:06:18 +0100,
Alan Cox wrote:
If it is native ALSA driver then it will restart after each underrun
and overrun. It is the applications job to do this, alsa-lib provides
all support for this. I have no idea of OSS and OSS emulation in ALSA.
Marek Wawrzyczny wrote:
Dear Linux Kernel ML,
I am writing as a Linux-only user of over 2 years to express my concern with
the recent proposal to block out closed source modules from the kernel.
While, I understand and share your sentiments over open source software and
drivers. I fear howev
5 matches
Mail list logo
