My 2 cents.
I don't read this mail list for this type of rubbish either. The technical
detail of this thread is all that seems appropriate here, not the issue
between George and Russell. I'd be embarrassed if I were either of them,
the way that they have presented themselves, don't they or the
Very good post. Our concerns for how we are using Linux are in line with
what Rich describes below.
On a previous project that I worked with we had a kernel debugger that could
be included in the kernel by option, and typically wasn't activated on live
systems unless we had someone on site and
Amen here too. From a kernel supportability perspective, a kernel debugger
has
saved me many hours. The open the doors to things that often can't be seen
or
seen easily by just knowing the source.
For a real world 24X7 type support situation where a problem needs fixing
_now_
or there are conse
3 matches
Mail list logo