x] Error 1
>
> found via 'make randconfig' build testing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Ingo - this should go via [EMAIL PROTECTED] or
[EMAIL PROTECTED] so it gets picked up by a maintainer.
Signed-off-by: Ian McDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscr
-by: Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ingo - this should go via [EMAIL PROTECTED] or
[EMAIL PROTECTED] so it gets picked up by a maintainer.
Signed-off-by: Ian McDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED
as part of DCCP subsystem:
F: include/linux/tfrc.h
Once this is done, and series goes in then:
Acked-by: Ian McDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
Web1: http://wand.net.nz/~iam4/
Web2: http://www.jandi.co.nz
Blog: http://iansblog.jandi.co.nz
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "un
, and series goes in then:
Acked-by: Ian McDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Web1: http://wand.net.nz/~iam4/
Web2: http://www.jandi.co.nz
Blog: http://iansblog.jandi.co.nz
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info
easily enough by adding a kfree(opt); before the
return statement.
The patch also changes the layout of the 'switch' to be more in line
with CodingStyle.
Patch has been compile tested.
Please consider merging.
Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Ian McDo
enough by adding a kfree(opt); before the
return statement.
The patch also changes the layout of the 'switch' to be more in line
with CodingStyle.
Patch has been compile tested.
Please consider merging.
Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Ian McDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED
On 7/10/07, Bill Davidsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If there were any benefit to removing a working driver I would at least
be able to see it as a resources issue, but as far as I can see you just
seem to have a personal preference for the e100 driver and want to force
others to use it because
On 7/10/07, Bill Davidsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If there were any benefit to removing a working driver I would at least
be able to see it as a resources issue, but as far as I can see you just
seem to have a personal preference for the e100 driver and want to force
others to use it because
On 6/21/07, Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
And yes, sometimes debugging *does* change what it debugs. In timing, if
nothing else, but also in the kinds of things you can do.
Totally agree.
For example, we
don't allow slab redzoning on data structures that have alignment
On 6/21/07, Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, for 2.6.22, Kprobes will just be disabled if you use DEBUG_RODATA.
And yes, that patch already got merged. However, the patch to *allow*
Kprobes with DEBUG_RODATA is not, and will not be. It's not a regression,
and quite frankly, I
On 6/21/07, Chuck Ebbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Subject: CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA prevents kprobes from working on
>> 2.6.22-rc2
>> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/23/202
>> Submitter : William Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> I
Andrew,
Can this one be merged so that it makes it into 2.6.22?
Subject: CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA prevents kprobes from working on 2.6.22-rc2
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/23/202
Submitter : William Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Ian McDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Andrew,
Can this one be merged so that it makes it into 2.6.22?
Subject: CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA prevents kprobes from working on 2.6.22-rc2
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/23/202
Submitter : William Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ian McDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Handled-By : S
On 6/21/07, Chuck Ebbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Subject: CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA prevents kprobes from working on
2.6.22-rc2
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/23/202
Submitter : William Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ian McDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Handled-By : S. P
On 6/21/07, Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, for 2.6.22, Kprobes will just be disabled if you use DEBUG_RODATA.
And yes, that patch already got merged. However, the patch to *allow*
Kprobes with DEBUG_RODATA is not, and will not be. It's not a regression,
and quite frankly, I don't
On 6/21/07, Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And yes, sometimes debugging *does* change what it debugs. In timing, if
nothing else, but also in the kinds of things you can do.
Totally agree.
For example, we
don't allow slab redzoning on data structures that have alignment
restrictions
On 6/7/07, S. P. Prasanna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >It faulted when it tried to write the breakpoint instruction into the
> >running kernel's executable code. Apparently the kernel code is now marked
> >read-only?
> >
> >
> Yes it would appear to be the case as user has CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA
>
On 6/7/07, S. P. Prasanna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It faulted when it tried to write the breakpoint instruction into the
running kernel's executable code. Apparently the kernel code is now marked
read-only?
Yes it would appear to be the case as user has CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA
set. Patrick
On 6/7/07, Chuck Ebbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 06/06/2007 04:47 PM, Ian McDonald wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> We've seen a report of a problem with dccp_probe as shown below. The
> user has also verified that it occurs in tcp_probe as well. This is on
> Dave Miller's tr
On 6/7/07, Chuck Ebbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 06/06/2007 04:47 PM, Ian McDonald wrote:
Hi there,
We've seen a report of a problem with dccp_probe as shown below. The
user has also verified that it occurs in tcp_probe as well. This is on
Dave Miller's tree but that currently tracks
On 4/15/07, Robert P. J. Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
in fact, according to this:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/1/13/139
that notice was put in the feature removal file well over a year ago,
during 2.6.15. so that would seem to be more than adequate time for
everyone to prepare for it. but it
On 4/15/07, Robert P. J. Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Remove the obsolete code for the traffic shaper.
Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Apart from the merits of removing this which I can't comment on, I
thought the usual procedure was to place a removal in
On 4/15/07, Robert P. J. Day [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Remove the obsolete code for the traffic shaper.
Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Apart from the merits of removing this which I can't comment on, I
thought the usual procedure was to place a removal in
On 4/15/07, Robert P. J. Day [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
in fact, according to this:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/1/13/139
that notice was put in the feature removal file well over a year ago,
during 2.6.15. so that would seem to be more than adequate time for
everyone to prepare for it. but it
Folks,
I'm getting this sort of message in my logs on occasion and my system
dies on me some time later.
Mar 13 08:52:02 localhost kernel: [ 343.931624] Slab corruption:
start=d2756f04, len=208
Mar 13 08:52:02 localhost kernel: [ 343.932366] Redzone: 0x5a2cf071/0x5a2cf071.
Mar 13 08:52:02
Folks,
I'm getting this sort of message in my logs on occasion and my system
dies on me some time later.
Mar 13 08:52:02 localhost kernel: [ 343.931624] Slab corruption:
start=d2756f04, len=208
Mar 13 08:52:02 localhost kernel: [ 343.932366] Redzone: 0x5a2cf071/0x5a2cf071.
Mar 13 08:52:02
On 3/5/07, Matt Mackall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is due to the recent sysfs restructuring I think. IIRC the fix is
> to upgrade hal to a current git version.
If that's the cause, the fix is to back out whatever was done to break
userspace. Breaking userspace is not ok. Upgrading from
On 3/5/07, Matt Mackall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is due to the recent sysfs restructuring I think. IIRC the fix is
to upgrade hal to a current git version.
If that's the cause, the fix is to back out whatever was done to break
userspace. Breaking userspace is not ok. Upgrading from 2.6.x
On 2/21/07, bert hubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm trying to figure out which processes have the most impact, I had already
killed anything non-essential. But that still leaves 140 pids.
Bert
That sounds way too many pids. I run a script to shut down processes
when I do testing as
ed-off-by: Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
It was an actual bug in pcim_pin_device() implementation. Thanks for
spotting this. :-)
Ian McDonald, please verify your warning goes away with this patch.
Yes it does. Thanks for sorting.
Greg, please forward this patch upstream once Ian acks
-by: Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
It was an actual bug in pcim_pin_device() implementation. Thanks for
spotting this. :-)
Ian McDonald, please verify your warning goes away with this patch.
Yes it does. Thanks for sorting.
Greg, please forward this patch upstream once Ian acks it.
Acked
On 2/21/07, bert hubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to figure out which processes have the most impact, I had already
killed anything non-essential. But that still leaves 140 pids.
Bert
That sounds way too many pids. I run a script to shut down processes
when I do testing as
On 2/19/07, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ian, you have an PATA controller so there is no need to use ata_piix.
Just disabling ata_piix should workaround the issue.
OK. I have done this and the message goes away in boot logs. As you
say I don't need the old drivers
I'm getting this in my logs when starting up after going from a
2.6.20rc5 kernel (which didn't do this) to Linus' latest tree as of 36
hours ago:
Feb 18 14:52:32 localhost kernel: [ 16.392136] Uniform
Multi-Platform E-IDE driver Revision: 7.00alpha2
Feb 18 14:52:32 localhost kernel: [
I'm getting this in my logs when starting up after going from a
2.6.20rc5 kernel (which didn't do this) to Linus' latest tree as of 36
hours ago:
Feb 18 14:52:32 localhost kernel: [ 16.392136] Uniform
Multi-Platform E-IDE driver Revision: 7.00alpha2
Feb 18 14:52:32 localhost kernel: [
On 2/19/07, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ian, you have an PATA controller so there is no need to use ata_piix.
Just disabling ata_piix should workaround the issue.
OK. I have done this and the message goes away in boot logs. As you
say I don't need the old drivers
In commit fba2591bf4e418b6c3f9f8794c9dd8fe40ae7bd9
test_clear_page_dirty was removed a couple of days ago.
Now when I try and build I get this:
WARNING: "test_clear_page_dirty" [fs/cifs/cifs.ko] undefined!
This is caused by line 1248 of fs/cifs/file.c
if
In commit fba2591bf4e418b6c3f9f8794c9dd8fe40ae7bd9
test_clear_page_dirty was removed a couple of days ago.
Now when I try and build I get this:
WARNING: test_clear_page_dirty [fs/cifs/cifs.ko] undefined!
This is caused by line 1248 of fs/cifs/file.c
if
38 matches
Mail list logo
