On 19.05.2013 11:57, luke.leighton wrote:
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 10:12 AM, Ian Stirling
wrote:
On 18.05.2013 19:27, luke.leighton wrote:
question: what is the procedure for having that licensing
explicitly
added to the linux kernel sources?
Fork the kernel, and put it up on a repo
with low power ones,
and energy saving versions, as they need replaced. My bills are too high.
My first choice - the K7S41GX - diddn't actually work out in that
athcool doesn't work at all (trying to raise the energy to look in the
chipset datasheet if I can find it)
Many thanks.
Ian S
>
> Mark Swanson wrote:
> > I get repeatable errors with 2.4.6 patched with the international encryption
> > patch patch-int-2.4.3.1.bz2 when building loop device filesystems on top of
> > Reiserfs.
>
> And the block size thing is not the only thing wrong with international
> crypto patch. The
>
>
> Is this (printing out versions. etc) really a big deal so we should add stuff
> like "/proc/xxx", KERN_ to make things more complicated? It sounds to me
> like to make the kernel "smaller" we'd actually end up with adding more code
> and complexity to it. And quite frankly, if peo
>
> Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > Things like version strings etc sound useful, but the fact is that the
> > only _real_ problem it has ever solved for anybody is when somebody thinks
> > they install a new kernel, and forgets to run "lilo" or something. But
> > even that information you really get f
>
> Obviously (to me) this check is in tcp_v4_get_port().
> But, I can't find it, or perhaps it's better hidden than I thought.
> Or maybe I'm just very confused.
> Any help would be most welcome.
The above poster was of course deeply stupid, and could have done with
more sleep :)
It's in net/ip
Obviously (to me) this check is in tcp_v4_get_port().
But, I can't find it, or perhaps it's better hidden than I thought.
Or maybe I'm just very confused.
Any help would be most welcome.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL P
Is there any way to delete the key of an existing loopback encrypted
device, and have it block, until a key is reloaded?
Of course any cached pages would need deleted, and dirty ones flushed
first.
To enable things like deleting keys from memory, before suspend-to-disk,
or forcing users of devic
>
> Hi!
>
> > I assume there is no generic APM support for lid-close?
> > My BIOS (P100 DEC CTS5100 Hinote VP) has no way to do anything other
> > than beep, when the lid is closed, so I'm using a hack that polls the
> > ct65548 video chips registers to find when the BIOS turns the LCD off,
> >
>
> On Thu, 26 Apr 2001, Ian Stirling wrote:
>
> > Also, there is another reason.
> > If you'r logged in as root, then any exploitable bug in large programs,
> > be it netscape, realplayer, wine, vmware, ... means that the
> > cracker owns your machine.
>
>
> On Thursday, April 26, 2001, at 07:03 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > he owns the computer, he may do anything he wants.
> Any OS worth its weight in silicon will make a distinction between
> blessed and unblessed users. It can be phrased in different ways --
> root vs. non-root, ad
I assume there is no generic APM support for lid-close?
My BIOS (P100 DEC CTS5100 Hinote VP) has no way to do anything other
than beep, when the lid is closed, so I'm using a hack that polls the
ct65548 video chips registers to find when the BIOS turns the LCD off,
so I can do whatever.
Or is the
>
> Hello,
ftp://www.kerneli.org/pub/linux/kerneli/
For idea encryption, you just use
losetup -e idea /dev/loop0 /filesystem
Password: whatever
mke2fs /dev/loop0
mount /dev/loop0
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTE
>
> Manfred Bartz responded to
> > Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> who writes:
> > You just illustrated my point. While there is a reset capability
> > people will use it and accounting/logging programs will get wrong
> > data. Resetable counters might be a minor convenience when debugging
>
Is there a way to dump the memory of any process without stopping, or
modifying it?
Obviously normally stopping it would be the right thing to do, but
is it possible, and if so, is there a handy tool?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a mes
> Not a chance. First your company must have at least 1500 licences and
> you can't modify any code... which implies that you can't rebuild either...
You can modify your compiler, so that it accepts patches (with no context)
and completely rewrite anything that needs modified.
The modified s
>
> > I'm not sure whether this is related to the ominous ps/2 mouse bug
> > you have been chasing, but this problem is 100% reproducible and
> > very annoying.
I'm also seeing a ps/2 mouse bug, with 2.4.0-pre5 (I think) on a
CS433 (486/33 laptop)
Freezes after some time in X, killing keyboar
>
> On Tue, 26 Dec 2000, Felix von Leitner wrote:
> > Thus spake Rik van Riel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > > > One more detail: top says the CPU is 50% system when reading from either
> > > > one of the disk or raid devices. That seems awfully high considering
> > > > that the Promise controller cla
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tim Wright) wrote on 24.12.00 in
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > On Sun, Dec 24, 2000 at 11:36:00AM +0200, Kai Henningsen wrote:
>
> > There was a similar thread to this recently. The issue is that if you
> > choose the wrong processor type, you may not even be able to comp
I've not noticed this on earlier kernel versions, is there something
silly I'm missing that's making my DEC hinote VP (p100 laptop)s
system clock slow by a factor of five or so after resume?
Not the CPU or cmos clock, only the system clock.
Thoughts welcome.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send
>
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2000 at 07:46:51PM +0000, Ian Stirling wrote:
> > Are there any patches floating around?
> > Basically to allow for example a server to dial out to ISP's on behalf
> > of users, and give them full control over that interface.
> > I know a
Are there any patches floating around?
Basically to allow for example a server to dial out to ISP's on behalf
of users, and give them full control over that interface.
I know about UML, and it's not quite suited.
I've not found anything searching archives, but maybe it's out there.
Thanks.
-
To un
I have just had a frustrating experience, solely blameable on my
own stupidity.
Basically, I'd been assuming that stopping after "booting kernel" was
due to some corruption, rather than the obvious, of checking that I had
indeed selected the right processor when compiling.
What about "booting the
Along with many others, I have an older laptop.
I also notice the large number of USB things released, some of which I'd like
to connect to it.
Is there hardware around? Is anyone working on drivers?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message
> The problem: I can't have the Tulip and EEPro drivers loaded at the same
> time. If I have the Tulip driver loaded, and I load the EEPro driver, the
> self check fails with 0x and complains that I don't have the card in
> a bus master slot. If I have the EEPro driver loaded and the eth
>
>
> > I take it then that you never use a hard drive in any of your systems on
> > the grounds that it contains non-open source firmware which may affect
> > the security of your system? ;) Tell me, what do you use to store all
> > those Linux applications on?
>
> Your ATA drive can't tell y
>
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 04:19:49AM +, Ingo Rohloff wrote:
> 2.4 has already broken backwards compatibility to 2.2 (IV changed
> from disk absolute to relative). When you change it now (before 2.4.0)
> it is relatively painless. I think the change is a good idea.
I've been away from th
27 matches
Mail list logo
